使用 Knex.js 进行的每个数据库查询打开和关闭与 RDS 代理的连接的缺点？

Question

The Postgres query builder my Lambda functions use, Knex , uses prepared statements so I'm unable to fully take advantage of RDS Proxy since the sessions are pinned. I try to ensure that the lambdas run for as little time as possible so that the pinned session completes as quickly as possible and its connection is returned to the pool.

I was wondering how I might be able to make the sessions shorter and more granular and thinking about creating and closing a connection to AWS RDS Proxy with each query.

What performance considerations should I be considering to determine the viability of this approach?

Things I'm thinking of:

• RDS Proxy connection overhead (latency and memory)
• The time that RDS Proxy takes to return a closed connection back to the pool and make it reusable by others (haven't been able to find documentation on this)
• Overhead of Knex's local connection pool

Answer 1

Using RDS proxy when building applications with Lambda functions is a recommended infrastructure pattern by AWS. Relational Databases are not built to handle tons of connections, while Lambdas can scale to thousands of instances.

RDS Proxy connection overhead (latency and memory)

This would definitely increase your latency, but you will see a great improvement in the CPU and memory usage of your database, which would ultimately prevent unnecessary failures. It's a good trade-off when you can do a lot of other optimizations on the lambda side.

The time that RDS Proxy takes to return a closed connection back to the pool and make it reusable by others (haven't been able to find documentation on this)

While working with Lambdas, you should drop the connection to your RDS proxy, as soon as you finish processing your logic without worrying about the time the RDS proxy would take to return the closed connection back. Once the connection is dropped, the RDS proxy keeps it warm in the pool of connections it maintains for a certain duration of time. If another lambda tries to make a connection meanwhile, it can share the same connection which is still warm in the pool. Dropping the database connection at the right time from your lambda would save you lambda processing time -> money.

Overhead of Knex's local connection pool

I would suggest not using Knex local connection pool with lambda as it won't do any good (Keep the pool max to 1). Every lambda execution is independent of another, the pool will never be shared and the connection doesn't persist after the execution completes unless you plan to use it with a serverless-offline kind of local framework for development purposes.

Read More about AWS Lambda + RDS Proxy usage: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/using-amazon-rds-proxy-with-aws-lambda/

AWS Documentation on where to use RDS Proxy: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/rds-proxy-planning.html