线程未释放 spring 引导中的 jdbc 连接

Question

We have a spring boot application whose starting point is an API. The API calls an interface say ITradeService which implements Callable. The ITradeService has a method service() which calls 7 methods in turn out of which the last three say method5() method6() and method7() are independent.

In the SIT,UAT environment for some reasons out of 4 nodes only one node is active and my project lead asked me to use 4 threads - 1 thread to execute the service method and other 3 threads to execute the above said 3 methods.

We have these three layers in our project

• Controller(Rest API)
• Service ITradeService
  TradeServiceImpl
  Type1TradeServiceImpl Type2TradeServiceImpl Type3TradeServiceImpl
• DAO CommonDao Type1Dao Type2Dao Type3Dao

We use JdbcTemplate in each of our DAO classes.

In our application.yaml we have configured the hikari database connection pool as 2

When i tried to execute the threads using ThreadPoolTaskExecutor for 4 requests the process is working as expected but when i send the 5th request it is saying

CannotCreateTransactionException Could not open JDBC Connection for transaction

I understand that the 4 threads are holding the JDBC Connection. I should make the threads release the JDBC connection and send it back to the hikari connection pool or i should close the threads upon task completion

How should i do it in a spring specific way?

Answer 1

It would be helpful to understand why you feel you need to run those three methods in parallel.

In any case, you can solve/mitigate the issue by:

• setting the appropriate connectionTimeout , and maximumPoolSize to make sure either the pool autoscales to meet the application demand, or the additional threads do not timeout while waiting for the connection to be released, and/or
• making sure the time the connection is open during the execution of those three methods is as short as possible, eg the thread is not doing heavy calculations, file access etc. within a @Transactional method.

Regarding the second bullet point, if you absolutely need the operations to be atomic, perhaps you could use optimistic locking (pull out the information you need and finish the unit of work there, do the heavylifting on a detached copy of the data, initiate another unit of work, see if the data changed in the meantime, and if so, retry the whole process, otherwise just update the data with your copy).