如何测试公共界面中没有的功能？

Question

I'm designing a library for myself that allows the chaining of streams of data. Let me paint the scenario:

I create a SerialDatastream which is the bottom layer and reads from and writes to a COM port.

I pass a pointer to this to the constructor of a ProtocolDatastream , which interprets the bytes when read from the serial datastream (although it only has knowledge that it fulfills my Datastream interface), and returns them as protocol data units.

Now let's say I want to take the information from the serial port and also log it byte for byte. I insert a TeeDatastream in the middle which reads from one source, but outputs to two destinations:

+-----> Log
               |
Serial ----> Tee ----> Protocol

TeeDatastream is implemented in the following way: when a read operation is performed from one branch, it buffers the data into a member variable. Then, when a read operation is performed on the other branch, it reads the already-buffered data.

(this works fine, by the way)

What this means is that, after each operation, the class must check to see if there exists data that has been read from both branches. This data can then be discarded and so the buffer shrinks as well as growing. However , this is completely invisible to any client of the class. So my question is: what pattern should be used to test invisible but necessary parts of an implementation?

Answer 1

What you need are unit tests for Tee itself; independent of its use later in other unit tests as part of the plumbing.

For these new unit tests, the "invisible part" is actually what they must cover. This is no longer a hidden feature but part of the API of Tee .

Later, when you're sure that Tee works correctly (and have the necessary tests to make sure it stays that way), you can use it and be oblivious to the fact how it works.

Answer 2

In the unit test cpp file locally declare a friend class and declare each protected member function you want to test.

class BlahTestable : public Blah
{
public: 
    using Blah::protectedfunction1;
    using Blah::protectedfunction2;
    etc....
};

Then in the unit test do

// for public members
TEST_F(BlahTest, publicfunction) {
    Blah s;
    s.publicfunction();
}

// for protected members
TEST_F(BlahTest, protectedfunction1) {
    BlahTestable s;
    s.protectedfunction1();
}

Answer 3

Unless I am missing something, it seems that you are looking for plain unit testing. This type of testing allows you to test both the public and the private parts of your code.