简体   繁体   English

在Java线程中同步

[英]Synchronized in a Java thread

My program is a client connected to multiple servers. 我的程序是连接到多个服务器的客户端。 I save connection objects to all servers in a static map object: 我将连接对象保存到静态映射对象中的所有服务器:

server1 -> connection1 服务器1->连接1
server2 -> connection2 服务器2->连接2
serverN -> connectionN serverN-> connectionN

public class CacheConnection {

    private final static Map cacheConnection = new HashMap();

    public static void add(String serverName, Socket sock) {
        synchronized (cacheConnection) {
            cacheConnection.put(serverName, sock);
        }
    }

    public static Socket get(String serverName) {
        return (Socket) cacheConnection.get(serverName);
    }

    ..
}

I have many threads getting connections from this map to communicate with the servers. 我有许多线程从此映射获取连接以与服务器通信。 How can I ensure a connection can only be used by one thread at a time? 如何确保一个连接一次只能由一个线程使用?

For example, I want to be sure thread 1 and thread 2 cannot use connection 1 at the same time. 例如,我想确保线程1和线程2不能同时使用连接1。

I am not completely sure, what you want. 我不确定您想要什么。 I assume that you want to guarantee that only one thread at a time accesses one particular server. 我假设您要保证一次仅一个线程访问一台特定服务器。

If your connection is something like a socket, then you can use it as a lock in a synchronization statement : 如果您的连接就像一个套接字,那么您可以将其用作同步语句中的锁:

private void send(Connection c, Data d) {
  synchronized (c) {
    // for each connection object, only one thread may be inside this block.
    // all other threads wait until the thread currently in this block exits it.
    c.send(d);
  }
}

// somewhere else ...

Data data = determineDataToSend()
Connection connection = map.get(key);
send(connection, data)

You can put the logic also into a decorator for the connection. 您也可以将逻辑放入连接的装饰器中。 This is especially useful if your connection has more than one method that send or receive (eg, because you use a higher abstraction level like RMI): 如果您的连接具有多个发送或接收方法(例如,因为您使用的是RMI等更高的抽象级别),则此功能特别有用:

public interface PowerfulConnection {
  public void doA();
  public int doB(ParameterForB param);
}

public class ConnectionImpl implements PowerfulConnection {
   // handles the actual connection
}

/**
 * This method is a decorator for PowerfulConnection that synchronizes all method accesses.
 */
public class SynchronizedConnection implements PowerfulConnection {
  private PowerfulConnection target;

  public SynchronizedConnection(PowerfulConnection target) {
    if (target == null) throw new NullPointerException();
    this.target = target;
  }

  public synchronized void doA() {
    target.doA();
  }

  public synchronized int doB(ParameterForB param) {
    return target.doB(param);
  }
}

If you are using the decorator approach, then the only thing you need to change is the instance creation. 如果您使用装饰器方法,则唯一需要更改的就是实例创建。 Instead of: 代替:

private void connect(key, connectionParams) {
  map.put(key, new ConnectionImpl(connectionParams));
}

use 采用

private void connect(key, connectionParams) {
  map.put(key, new SynchronizedConnection(new ConnectionImpl(connectionParams)));
}

Or, in your initial example, the get method could just remove the connection from the map. 或者,在您的第一个示例中,get方法可能只是从地图上删除了连接。 Of course, that means the client would have to be sure (probably in a finally block, to call add again, when done) 当然,这意味着客户端必须确定(可能在finally块中,完成后再次调用add)

Then have wait and notify loops for when a client comes in to ask for a connection, and it's not there. 然后,等待并通知循环,以了解何时有客户端进入以请求连接,但该连接不存在。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM