哪种方式为字符串保留内存？

Question

I have created a macro to make reserve memory for my strings in C . It looks like this:

#define newString(size) (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) + size)

So is there any reason I shouldn't use this macro in my own personal projects? I know I shouldn't do this in production code because it would require everyone to have that header file and everyone to know that newString was a macro.

Answer 1

(char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * (size+1)) would be more appropriate (the +1 is to account for the NULL at the end of string, if applicable).

If one is copying a string, strlen() doesn't account for the NULL terminating the string hence an additional memory char is required.

Answer 2

I'm not so sure it's a good idea to use the preprocessor to save yourself some typing. (That road is dark and scary.) It won't be long before you'll want to add something to your macro, and you'll start running into problems that will be way hard to debug.

If you're rolling your own memory management, then use a real function and provide a complimentary "delete" function.

If you're worried about performance, your compiler is smart enough to inline little functions for you.

Answer 3

You should check if the allocation was successful.

char* ptr = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * size); //Not '+' size!!
if (ptr == 0) //or NULL if defined
{
    //cannot allocate
}

But there is no problem in using a macro

Answer 4

The main reason is that sizeof(char) is defined to always be 1. So you should write instead:

malloc(size)

and it will be shorter to write this than newString(size) . Also, malloc returns a void * which you don't need to cast in C.

The other reason is so you don't write a + when you mean * .

Answer 5

Your macro is equivalent to

malloc(size + 1)

as in C you don't need to cast the result of malloc and sizeof(char) equals 1 by definition. So it doesn't really save you much typing. I would recommend against it, even in your personal projects, as I don't see any benefit to it.