如何使用点“。” 访问字典的成员？

Question

How do I make Python dictionary members accessible via a dot "."?

For example, instead of writing mydict['val'] , I'd like to write mydict.val .

Also I'd like to access nested dicts this way. For example

mydict.mydict2.val 

would refer to

mydict = { 'mydict2': { 'val': ... } }

Answer 1

I've always kept this around in a util file. You can use it as a mixin on your own classes too.

class dotdict(dict):
    """dot.notation access to dictionary attributes"""
    __getattr__ = dict.get
    __setattr__ = dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__ = dict.__delitem__

mydict = {'val':'it works'}
nested_dict = {'val':'nested works too'}
mydict = dotdict(mydict)
mydict.val
# 'it works'

mydict.nested = dotdict(nested_dict)
mydict.nested.val
# 'nested works too'

Answer 2

You can do it using this class I just made. With this class you can use the Map object like another dictionary(including json serialization) or with the dot notation. I hope to help you:

class Map(dict):
    """
    Example:
    m = Map({'first_name': 'Eduardo'}, last_name='Pool', age=24, sports=['Soccer'])
    """
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(Map, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, dict):
                for k, v in arg.iteritems():
                    self[k] = v

        if kwargs:
            for k, v in kwargs.iteritems():
                self[k] = v

    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self.get(attr)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        self.__setitem__(key, value)

    def __setitem__(self, key, value):
        super(Map, self).__setitem__(key, value)
        self.__dict__.update({key: value})

    def __delattr__(self, item):
        self.__delitem__(item)

    def __delitem__(self, key):
        super(Map, self).__delitem__(key)
        del self.__dict__[key]

Usage examples:

m = Map({'first_name': 'Eduardo'}, last_name='Pool', age=24, sports=['Soccer'])
# Add new key
m.new_key = 'Hello world!'
# Or
m['new_key'] = 'Hello world!'
print m.new_key
print m['new_key']
# Update values
m.new_key = 'Yay!'
# Or
m['new_key'] = 'Yay!'
# Delete key
del m.new_key
# Or
del m['new_key']

Answer 3

Install dotmap via pip

pip install dotmap

It does everything you want it to do and subclasses dict , so it operates like a normal dictionary:

from dotmap import DotMap

m = DotMap()
m.hello = 'world'
m.hello
m.hello += '!'
# m.hello and m['hello'] now both return 'world!'
m.val = 5
m.val2 = 'Sam'

On top of that, you can convert it to and from dict objects:

d = m.toDict()
m = DotMap(d) # automatic conversion in constructor

This means that if something you want to access is already in dict form, you can turn it into a DotMap for easy access:

import json
jsonDict = json.loads(text)
data = DotMap(jsonDict)
print data.location.city

Finally, it automatically creates new child DotMap instances so you can do things like this:

m = DotMap()
m.people.steve.age = 31

Comparison to Bunch

Full disclosure: I am the creator of the DotMap . I created it because Bunch was missing these features

• remembering the order items are added and iterating in that order
• automatic child DotMap creation, which saves time and makes for cleaner code when you have a lot of hierarchy
• constructing from a dict and recursively converting all child dict instances to DotMap

Answer 4

Derive from dict and and implement __getattr__ and __setattr__ .

Or you can use Bunch which is very similar.

I don't think it's possible to monkeypatch built-in dict class.

Answer 5

Use SimpleNamespace :

>>> from types import SimpleNamespace   
>>> d = dict(x=[1, 2], y=['a', 'b'])
>>> ns = SimpleNamespace(**d)
>>> ns.x
[1, 2]
>>> ns
namespace(x=[1, 2], y=['a', 'b'])

Answer 6

Fabric has a really nice, minimal implementation . Extending that to allow for nested access, we can use a defaultdict , and the result looks something like this:

from collections import defaultdict

class AttributeDict(defaultdict):
    def __init__(self):
        super(AttributeDict, self).__init__(AttributeDict)

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return self[key]
        except KeyError:
            raise AttributeError(key)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        self[key] = value

Make use of it as follows:

keys = AttributeDict()
keys.abc.xyz.x = 123
keys.abc.xyz.a.b.c = 234

That elaborates a bit on Kugel's answer of "Derive from dict and and implement __getattr__ and __setattr__ ". Now you know how!

Answer 7

I tried this:

class dotdict(dict):
    def __getattr__(self, name):
        return self[name]

you can try __getattribute__ too.

make every dict a type of dotdict would be good enough, if you want to init this from a multi-layer dict, try implement __init__ too.

Answer 8

I recently came across the ' Box ' library which does the same thing.

Installation command : pip install python-box

Example:

from box import Box

mydict = {"key1":{"v1":0.375,
                    "v2":0.625},
          "key2":0.125,
          }
mydict = Box(mydict)

print(mydict.key1.v1)

I found it to be more effective than other existing libraries like dotmap, which generate python recursion error when you have large nested dicts.

link to library and details: https://pypi.org/project/python-box/

Answer 9

If you want to pickle your modified dictionary, you need to add few state methods to above answers:

class DotDict(dict):
    """dot.notation access to dictionary attributes"""
    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self.get(attr)
    __setattr__= dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__= dict.__delitem__

    def __getstate__(self):
        return self

    def __setstate__(self, state):
        self.update(state)
        self.__dict__ = self

Answer 10

Don't. Attribute access and indexing are separate things in Python, and you shouldn't want them to perform the same. Make a class (possibly one made by namedtuple ) if you have something that should have accessible attributes and use [] notation to get an item from a dict.

Answer 11

Building on Kugel's answer and taking Mike Graham's words of caution into consideration, what if we make a wrapper?

class DictWrap(object):
  """ Wrap an existing dict, or create a new one, and access with either dot 
    notation or key lookup.

    The attribute _data is reserved and stores the underlying dictionary.
    When using the += operator with create=True, the empty nested dict is 
    replaced with the operand, effectively creating a default dictionary
    of mixed types.

    args:
      d({}): Existing dict to wrap, an empty dict is created by default
      create(True): Create an empty, nested dict instead of raising a KeyError

    example:
      >>>dw = DictWrap({'pp':3})
      >>>dw.a.b += 2
      >>>dw.a.b += 2
      >>>dw.a['c'] += 'Hello'
      >>>dw.a['c'] += ' World'
      >>>dw.a.d
      >>>print dw._data
      {'a': {'c': 'Hello World', 'b': 4, 'd': {}}, 'pp': 3}

  """

  def __init__(self, d=None, create=True):
    if d is None:
      d = {}
    supr = super(DictWrap, self)  
    supr.__setattr__('_data', d)
    supr.__setattr__('__create', create)

  def __getattr__(self, name):
    try:
      value = self._data[name]
    except KeyError:
      if not super(DictWrap, self).__getattribute__('__create'):
        raise
      value = {}
      self._data[name] = value

    if hasattr(value, 'items'):
      create = super(DictWrap, self).__getattribute__('__create')
      return DictWrap(value, create)
    return value

  def __setattr__(self, name, value):
    self._data[name] = value  

  def __getitem__(self, key):
    try:
      value = self._data[key]
    except KeyError:
      if not super(DictWrap, self).__getattribute__('__create'):
        raise
      value = {}
      self._data[key] = value

    if hasattr(value, 'items'):
      create = super(DictWrap, self).__getattribute__('__create')
      return DictWrap(value, create)
    return value

  def __setitem__(self, key, value):
    self._data[key] = value

  def __iadd__(self, other):
    if self._data:
      raise TypeError("A Nested dict will only be replaced if it's empty")
    else:
      return other

Answer 12

To build upon epool's answer, this version allows you to access any dict inside via the dot operator:

foo = {
    "bar" : {
        "baz" : [ {"boo" : "hoo"} , {"baba" : "loo"} ]
    }
}

For instance, foo.bar.baz[1].baba returns "loo" .

class Map(dict):
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(Map, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, dict):
                for k, v in arg.items():
                    if isinstance(v, dict):
                        v = Map(v)
                    if isinstance(v, list):
                        self.__convert(v)
                    self[k] = v

        if kwargs:
            for k, v in kwargs.items():
                if isinstance(v, dict):
                    v = Map(v)
                elif isinstance(v, list):
                    self.__convert(v)
                self[k] = v

    def __convert(self, v):
        for elem in range(0, len(v)):
            if isinstance(v[elem], dict):
                v[elem] = Map(v[elem])
            elif isinstance(v[elem], list):
                self.__convert(v[elem])

    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self.get(attr)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        self.__setitem__(key, value)

    def __setitem__(self, key, value):
        super(Map, self).__setitem__(key, value)
        self.__dict__.update({key: value})

    def __delattr__(self, item):
        self.__delitem__(item)

    def __delitem__(self, key):
        super(Map, self).__delitem__(key)
        del self.__dict__[key]

Answer 13

You can achieve this using SimpleNamespace

from types import SimpleNamespace
# Assign values
args = SimpleNamespace()
args.username = 'admin'

# Retrive values
print(args.username)  # output: admin

Answer 14

Use __getattr__ , very simple, works in Python 3.4.3

class myDict(dict):
    def __getattr__(self,val):
        return self[val]


blockBody=myDict()
blockBody['item1']=10000
blockBody['item2']="StackOverflow"
print(blockBody.item1)
print(blockBody.item2)

Output:

10000
StackOverflow

Answer 15

I like the Munch and it gives lot of handy options on top of dot access.

import munch

temp_1 = {'person': { 'fname': 'senthil', 'lname': 'ramalingam'}}

dict_munch = munch.munchify(temp_1)

dict_munch.person.fname

Answer 16

The language itself doesn't support this, but sometimes this is still a useful requirement. Besides the Bunch recipe, you can also write a little method which can access a dictionary using a dotted string:

def get_var(input_dict, accessor_string):
    """Gets data from a dictionary using a dotted accessor-string"""
    current_data = input_dict
    for chunk in accessor_string.split('.'):
        current_data = current_data.get(chunk, {})
    return current_data

which would support something like this:

>> test_dict = {'thing': {'spam': 12, 'foo': {'cheeze': 'bar'}}}
>> output = get_var(test_dict, 'thing.spam.foo.cheeze')
>> print output
'bar'
>>

Answer 17

I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

See the original implementation here by https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel .

The other thing to note, is that this implementation is pretty simple and doesn't implement all of the methods you might need. You'll need to write those as required on the DictProxy or ListProxy objects.

Answer 18

This solution is a refinement upon the one offered by epool to address the requirement of the OP to access nested dicts in a consistent manner. The solution by epool did not allow for accessing nested dicts.

class YAMLobj(dict):
    def __init__(self, args):
        super(YAMLobj, self).__init__(args)
        if isinstance(args, dict):
            for k, v in args.iteritems():
                if not isinstance(v, dict):
                    self[k] = v
                else:
                    self.__setattr__(k, YAMLobj(v))


    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self.get(attr)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        self.__setitem__(key, value)

    def __setitem__(self, key, value):
        super(YAMLobj, self).__setitem__(key, value)
        self.__dict__.update({key: value})

    def __delattr__(self, item):
        self.__delitem__(item)

    def __delitem__(self, key):
        super(YAMLobj, self).__delitem__(key)
        del self.__dict__[key]

With this class, one can now do something like: ABCD .

Answer 19

def dict_to_object(dick):
    # http://stackoverflow.com/a/1305663/968442

    class Struct:
        def __init__(self, **entries):
            self.__dict__.update(entries)

    return Struct(**dick)

If one decides to permanently convert that dict to object this should do. You can create a throwaway object just before accessing.

d = dict_to_object(d)

Answer 20

For infinite levels of nesting of dicts, lists, lists of dicts, and dicts of lists.

It also supports pickling

This is an extension of this answer .

class DotDict(dict):
    # https://stackoverflow.com/a/70665030/913098
    """
    Example:
    m = Map({'first_name': 'Eduardo'}, last_name='Pool', age=24, sports=['Soccer'])

    Iterable are assumed to have a constructor taking list as input.
    """

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(DotDict, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)

        args_with_kwargs = []
        for arg in args:
            args_with_kwargs.append(arg)
        args_with_kwargs.append(kwargs)
        args = args_with_kwargs

        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, dict):
                for k, v in arg.items():
                    self[k] = v
                    if isinstance(v, dict):
                        self[k] = DotDict(v)
                    elif isinstance(v, str) or isinstance(v, bytes):
                        self[k] = v
                    elif isinstance(v, Iterable):
                        klass = type(v)
                        map_value: List[Any] = []
                        for e in v:
                            map_e = DotDict(e) if isinstance(e, dict) else e
                            map_value.append(map_e)
                        self[k] = klass(map_value)



    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self.get(attr)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        self.__setitem__(key, value)

    def __setitem__(self, key, value):
        super(DotDict, self).__setitem__(key, value)
        self.__dict__.update({key: value})

    def __delattr__(self, item):
        self.__delitem__(item)

    def __delitem__(self, key):
        super(DotDict, self).__delitem__(key)
        del self.__dict__[key]

    def __getstate__(self):
        return self.__dict__

    def __setstate__(self, d):
        self.__dict__.update(d)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    import pickle
    def test_map():
        d = {
            "a": 1,
            "b": {
                "c": "d",
                "e": 2,
                "f": None
            },
            "g": [],
            "h": [1, "i"],
            "j": [1, "k", {}],
            "l":
                [
                    1,
                    "m",
                    {
                        "n": [3],
                        "o": "p",
                        "q": {
                            "r": "s",
                            "t": ["u", 5, {"v": "w"}, ],
                            "x": ("z", 1)
                        }
                    }
                ],
        }
        map_d = DotDict(d)
        w = map_d.l[2].q.t[2].v
        assert w == "w"

        pickled = pickle.dumps(map_d)
        unpickled = pickle.loads(pickled)
        assert unpickled == map_d

        kwargs_check = DotDict(a=1, b=[dict(c=2, d="3"), 5])
        assert kwargs_check.b[0].d == "3"

        kwargs_and_args_check = DotDict(d, a=1, b=[dict(c=2, d="3"), 5])
        assert kwargs_and_args_check.l[2].q.t[2].v == "w"
        assert kwargs_and_args_check.b[0].d == "3"



    test_map()

Answer 21

This also works with nested dicts and makes sure that dicts which are appended later behave the same:

class DotDict(dict):

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        # Recursively turn nested dicts into DotDicts
        for key, value in self.items():
            if type(value) is dict:
                self[key] = DotDict(value)

    def __setitem__(self, key, item):
        if type(item) is dict:
            item = DotDict(item)
        super().__setitem__(key, item)

    __setattr__ = __setitem__
    __getattr__ = dict.__getitem__

Answer 22

Using namedtuple allows dot access.

It is like a lightweight object which also has the properties of a tuple.

It allows to define properties and access them using the dot operator .

from collections import namedtuple
Data = namedtuple('Data', ['key1', 'key2'])

dataObj = Data(val1, key2=val2) # can instantiate using keyword arguments and positional arguments

Access using dot operator

dataObj.key1 # Gives val1
datObj.key2 # Gives val2

Access using tuple indices

dataObj[0] # Gives val1
dataObj[1] # Gives val2

But remember this is a tuple; not a dict . So the below code will give error

dataObj['key1'] # Gives TypeError: tuple indices must be integers or slices, not str

Refer: namedtuple

Answer 23

这是一个老问题，但我最近发现sklearn有一个可通过密钥访问的实现版本dict ，即Bunch https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.utils.Bunch.html#sklearn.utils。束

Answer 24

Simplest solution.

Define a class with only pass statement in it. Create object for this class and use dot notation.

class my_dict:
    pass

person = my_dict()
person.id = 1 # create using dot notation
person.phone = 9999
del person.phone # Remove a property using dot notation

name_data = my_dict()
name_data.first_name = 'Arnold'
name_data.last_name = 'Schwarzenegger'

person.name = name_data
person.name.first_name # dot notation access for nested properties - gives Arnold

Answer 25

One simple way to get dot access (but not array access), is to use a plain object in Python. Like this:

class YourObject:
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        for k, v in kwargs.items():
            setattr(self, k, v)

...and use it like this:

>>> obj = YourObject(key="value")
>>> print(obj.key)
"value"

... to convert it to a dict:

>>> print(obj.__dict__)
{"key": "value"}

Answer 26

The answer of @derek73 is very neat, but it cannot be pickled nor (deep)copied, and it returns None for missing keys. The code below fixes this.

Edit: I did not see the answer above that addresses the exact same point (upvoted). I'm leaving the answer here for reference.

class dotdict(dict):
    __setattr__ = dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__ = dict.__delitem__

    def __getattr__(self, name):
        try:
            return self[name]
        except KeyError:
            raise AttributeError(name)

Answer 27

I just needed to access a dictionary using a dotted path string, so I came up with:

def get_value_from_path(dictionary, parts):
    """ extracts a value from a dictionary using a dotted path string """

    if type(parts) is str:
        parts = parts.split('.')

    if len(parts) > 1:
        return get_value_from_path(dictionary[parts[0]], parts[1:])

    return dictionary[parts[0]]

a = {'a':{'b':'c'}}
print(get_value_from_path(a, 'a.b')) # c

Answer 28

I'd like to throw my own solution into the ring:

https://github.com/skorokithakis/jsane

It allows you to parse JSON into something you can access with.attribute.lookups.like.this.r() , mostly because I hadn't seen this answer before starting to work on it.

Answer 29

Not a direct answer to the OP's question, but inspired by and perhaps useful for some.. I've created an object-based solution using the internal __dict__ (In no way optimized code)

payload = {
    "name": "John",
    "location": {
        "lat": 53.12312312,
        "long": 43.21345112
    },
    "numbers": [
        {
            "role": "home",
            "number": "070-12345678"
        },
        {
            "role": "office",
            "number": "070-12345679"
        }
    ]
}


class Map(object):
    """
    Dot style access to object members, access raw values
    with an underscore e.g.

    class Foo(Map):
        def foo(self):
            return self.get('foo') + 'bar'

    obj = Foo(**{'foo': 'foo'})

    obj.foo => 'foobar'
    obj._foo => 'foo'

    """

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, dict):
                for k, v in arg.iteritems():
                    self.__dict__[k] = v
                    self.__dict__['_' + k] = v

        if kwargs:
            for k, v in kwargs.iteritems():
                self.__dict__[k] = v
                self.__dict__['_' + k] = v

    def __getattribute__(self, attr):
        if hasattr(self, 'get_' + attr):
            return object.__getattribute__(self, 'get_' + attr)()
        else:
            return object.__getattribute__(self, attr)

    def get(self, key):
        try:
            return self.__dict__.get('get_' + key)()
        except (AttributeError, TypeError):
            return self.__dict__.get(key)

    def __repr__(self):
        return u"<{name} object>".format(
            name=self.__class__.__name__
        )


class Number(Map):
    def get_role(self):
        return self.get('role')

    def get_number(self):
        return self.get('number')


class Location(Map):
    def get_latitude(self):
        return self.get('lat') + 1

    def get_longitude(self):
        return self.get('long') + 1


class Item(Map):
    def get_name(self):
        return self.get('name') + " Doe"

    def get_location(self):
        return Location(**self.get('location'))

    def get_numbers(self):
        return [Number(**n) for n in self.get('numbers')]


# Tests

obj = Item({'foo': 'bar'}, **payload)

assert type(obj) == Item
assert obj._name == "John"
assert obj.name == "John Doe"
assert type(obj.location) == Location
assert obj.location._lat == 53.12312312
assert obj.location._long == 43.21345112
assert obj.location.latitude == 54.12312312
assert obj.location.longitude == 44.21345112

for n in obj.numbers:
    assert type(n) == Number
    if n.role == 'home':
        assert n.number == "070-12345678"
    if n.role == 'office':
        assert n.number == "070-12345679"

Answer 30

Here's my version of @derek73 answer . I use dict.__getitem__ as __getattr__ so it still throws KeyError , and im renaming dict public methods with " " prefix (surrounded with " " leads to special methods name conflict, like __get__ which would be treated as a descriptor method). Anyway you can't get completely clear namespace for keys as attributes due to crucial dict base methods, so the solution isn't perfect but you can have keys - attributes like get , pop , items etc.

class DotDictMeta(type):                                                          
    def __new__(                                                                  
        cls,                                                                      
        name,                                                                     
        bases,                                                                    
        attrs,                                         
        rename_method=lambda n: f'__{n}__',                            
        **custom_methods,                                                         
    ):                                                                            
        d = dict                                                                  
        attrs.update(                                                             
            cls.get_hidden_or_renamed_methods(rename_method),           
            __getattr__=d.__getitem__,                                            
            __setattr__=d.__setitem__,                                            
            __delattr__=d.__delitem__,                                            
            **custom_methods,                                                     
        )                                                                         
        return super().__new__(cls, name, bases, attrs)                           
                                                                                  
    def __init__(self, name, bases, attrs, **_):                                  
        super().__init__(name, bases, attrs)                                      
                                                                                  
    @property                                                                     
    def attribute_error(self):                                                    
        raise AttributeError                                                      
                                                                                  
    @classmethod                                                                  
    def get_hidden_or_renamed_methods(cls, rename_method=None):                  
        public_methods = tuple(                                                   
            i for i in dict.__dict__.items() if not i[0].startswith('__')         
        )                                                                         
        error = cls.attribute_error                                               
        hidden_methods = ((k, error) for k, v in public_methods)                  
        yield from hidden_methods                                                 
        if rename_method:                                                       
            renamed_methods = ((rename_method(k), v) for k, v in public_methods) 
            yield from renamed_methods                                             
                                                                                  
                                                                                  
class DotDict(dict, metaclass=DotDictMeta):                                       
    pass  

                                                                    
                                                                              

You can remove dict methods from DotDict namespace and keep using dict class methods, its useful also when you want to operate on other dict instances and want to use the same methods without extra check whether its DotDict or not, eg.

dct = dict(a=1)
dot_dct = DotDict(b=2)
foo = {c: i for i, c in enumerate('xyz')}
for d in (dct, dot_dct):
    # you would have to use dct.update and dot_dct.__update methods
    dict.update(d, foo)
    
assert dict.get(dot, 'foo', 0) is 0

Answer 31

I just dug this up from a project I was working on a long time ago. It could probably be optimized a bit, but here it goes.

class DotNotation(dict):
    
    __setattr__= dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__= dict.__delitem__

    def __init__(self, data):
        if isinstance(data, str):
            data = json.loads(data)
    
        for name, value in data.items():
            setattr(self, name, self._wrap(value))

    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        def _traverse(obj, attr):
            if self._is_indexable(obj):
                try:
                    return obj[int(attr)]
                except:
                    return None
            elif isinstance(obj, dict):
                return obj.get(attr, None)
            else:
                return attr
        if '.' in attr:
            return reduce(_traverse, attr.split('.'), self)
        return self.get(attr, None)

    def _wrap(self, value):
        if self._is_indexable(value):
            # (!) recursive (!)
            return type(value)([self._wrap(v) for v in value])
        elif isinstance(value, dict):
            return DotNotation(value)
        else:
            return value
    
    @staticmethod
    def _is_indexable(obj):
        return isinstance(obj, (tuple, list, set, frozenset))


if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_dict = {
        "dimensions": {
            "length": "112",
            "width": "103",
            "height": "42"
        },
        "meta_data": [
            {
                "id": 11089769,
                "key": "imported_gallery_files",
                "value": [
                    "https://example.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/unnamed-3.jpg",
                    "https://example.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/unnamed-2.jpg",
                    "https://example.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/unnamed-4.jpg"
                ]
            }
        ]
    }
    dotted_dict = DotNotation(test_dict)
    print(dotted_dict.dimensions.length) # => '112'
    print(getattr(dotted_dict, 'dimensions.length')) # => '112'
    print(dotted_dict.meta_data[0].key) # => 'imported_gallery_files'
    print(getattr(dotted_dict, 'meta_data.0.key')) # => 'imported_gallery_files'
    print(dotted_dict.meta_data[0].value) # => ['link1','link2','link2']
    print(getattr(dotted_dict, 'meta_data.0.value')) # => ['link1','link2','link3']
    print(dotted_dict.meta_data[0].value[2]) # => 'link3'
    print(getattr(dotted_dict, 'meta_data.0.value.2')) # => 'link3'

Answer 32

My 2 cents: for my own purposes I developed minydra , a simple command-line parser which includes a custom class MinyDict (inspired by addict ):

In [1]: from minydra import MinyDict

In [2]: args = MinyDict({"foo": "bar", "yes.no.maybe": "idontknow"}).pretty_print(); args
╭──────────────────────────────╮
│ foo          : bar           │
│ yes.no.maybe : idontknow     │
╰──────────────────────────────╯
Out[2]: {'foo': 'bar', 'yes.no.maybe': 'idontknow'}

In [3]: args.resolve().pretty_print(); args
╭──────────────────────────╮
│ foo : bar                │
│ yes                      │
│ │no                      │
│ │ │maybe : idontknow     │
╰──────────────────────────╯
Out[3]: {'foo': 'bar', 'yes': {'no': {'maybe': 'idontknow'}}}

In [4]: args.yes.no.maybe
Out[4]: "idontknow"

In [5]: "foo" in args
Out[5]: True

In [6]: "rick" in args
Out[6]: False

In [7]: args.morty is None
Out[7]: True

In [8]: args.items()
Out[8]: dict_items([('foo', 'bar'), ('yes', {'no': {'maybe': 'idontknow'}})])

It goes further than addict by adding dumping/loading methods to/from json yaml and pickle and also has a strict mode in MinyDict.update() to prevent the creation of new keys (this is useful to prevent typos in the command-line)

Answer 33

I dislike adding another log to a (more than) 10-year old fire, but I'd also check out the dotwiz library, which I've recently released - just this year actually.

It's a relatively tiny library, which also performs really well for get (access) and set (create) times in benchmarks , at least as compared to other alternatives.

Install dotwiz via pip

pip install dotwiz

It does everything you want it to do and subclasses dict , so it operates like a normal dictionary:

from dotwiz import DotWiz

dw = DotWiz()
dw.hello = 'world'
dw.hello
dw.hello += '!'
# dw.hello and dw['hello'] now both return 'world!'
dw.val = 5
dw.val2 = 'Sam'

On top of that, you can convert it to and from dict objects:

d = dw.to_dict()
dw = DotWiz(d) # automatic conversion in constructor

This means that if something you want to access is already in dict form, you can turn it into a DotWiz for easy access:

import json
json_dict = json.loads(text)
data = DotWiz(json_dict)
print data.location.city

Finally, something exciting I am working on is an existing feature request so that it automatically creates new child DotWiz instances so you can do things like this:

dw = DotWiz()
dw['people.steve.age'] = 31

dw
# ✫(people=✫(steve=✫(age=31)))

Comparison with dotmap

I've added a quick and dirty performance comparison with dotmap below.

First, install both libraries with pip :

pip install dotwiz dotmap

I came up with the following code for benchmark purposes:

from timeit import timeit

from dotwiz import DotWiz
from dotmap import DotMap


d = {'hey': {'so': [{'this': {'is': {'pretty': {'cool': True}}}}]}}

dw = DotWiz(d)
# ✫(hey=✫(so=[✫(this=✫(is=✫(pretty={'cool'})))]))

dm = DotMap(d)
# DotMap(hey=DotMap(so=[DotMap(this=DotMap(is=DotMap(pretty={'cool'})))]))

assert dw.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool == dm.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool

n = 100_000

print('dotwiz (create):  ', round(timeit('DotWiz(d)', number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotmap (create):  ', round(timeit('DotMap(d)', number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotwiz (get):  ', round(timeit("dw.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool", number=n, globals=globals()), 3))
print('dotmap (get):  ', round(timeit("dm.hey.so[0].this['is'].pretty.cool", number=n, globals=globals()), 3))

Results, on my M1 Mac, running Python 3.10:

dotwiz (create):   0.189
dotmap (create):   1.085
dotwiz (get):   0.014
dotmap (get):   0.335

Answer 34

The implemention used by kaggle_environments is a function called structify .

class Struct(dict):
    def __init__(self, **entries):
        entries = {k: v for k, v in entries.items() if k != "items"}
        dict.__init__(self, entries)
        self.__dict__.update(entries)

    def __setattr__(self, attr, value):
        self.__dict__[attr] = value
        self[attr] = value

# Added benefit of cloning lists and dicts.
def structify(o):
    if isinstance(o, list):
        return [structify(o[i]) for i in range(len(o))]
    elif isinstance(o, dict):
        return Struct(**{k: structify(v) for k, v in o.items()})
    return o

• https://github.com/Kaggle/kaggle-environments/blob/master/kaggle_environments/utils.py

This may be useful for testing AI simulation agents in games like ConnectX

from kaggle_environments import structify

obs  = structify({ 'remainingOverageTime': 60, 'step': 0, 'mark': 1, 'board': [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]})
conf = structify({ 'timeout': 2, 'actTimeout': 2, 'agentTimeout': 60, 'episodeSteps': 1000, 'runTimeout': 1200, 'columns': 7, 'rows': 6, 'inarow': 4, '__raw_path__': '/kaggle_simulations/agent/main.py' })

def agent(obs, conf):
  action = obs.step % conf.columns
  return action

Answer 35

If you're already using pandas, you can construct a pandas Series or DataFrame from which you would be able to access items via the dot syntax:

1-level dictionary:

import pandas as pd

my_dictionary = pd.Series({
  'key1': 'value1',
  'key2': 'value2'
})

print(my_dictionary.key1)
# Output: value1

2-level dictionary:

import pandas as pd

my_dictionary = pd.DataFrame({
  'key1': {
    'inner_key1': 'value1'
  },
  'key2': {
    'inner_key2': 'value2'
  }
})

print(my_dictionary.key1.inner_key1)
# Output: value1

Be aware that this probably works better with a normalised data structure (where each dictionary entry has the same structure). In the second example above, the resulting DataFrame is:

              key1    key2
inner_key1  value1     NaN
inner_key2     NaN  value2

Answer 36

One could use dotsi , for full list, dict and recursive support, with some extension methods

pip install dotsi

and

>>> import dotsi
>>> 
>>> d = dotsi.Dict({"foo": {"bar": "baz"}})     # Basic
>>> d.foo.bar
'baz'
>>> d.users = [{"id": 0, "name": "Alice"}]   # List
>>> d.users[0].name
'Alice'
>>> d.users.append({"id": 1, "name": "Becca"}); # Append
>>> d.users[1].name
'Becca'
>>> d.users += [{"id": 2, "name": "Cathy"}];    # `+=`
>>> d.users[2].name
'Cathy'
>>> d.update({"tasks": [{"id": "a", "text": "Task A"}]});
>>> d.tasks[0].text
'Task A'
>>> d.tasks[0].tags = ["red", "white", "blue"];
>>> d.tasks[0].tags[2];
'blue'
>>> d.tasks[0].pop("tags")                      # `.pop()`
['red', 'white', 'blue']
>>> 
>>> import pprint
>>> pprint.pprint(d)
{'foo': {'bar': 'baz'},
 'tasks': [{'id': 'a', 'text': 'Task A'}],
 'users': [{'id': 0, 'name': 'Alice'},
           {'id': 1, 'name': 'Becca'},
           {'id': 2, 'name': 'Cathy'}]}
>>> 
>>> type(d.users)       # dotsi.Dict (AKA dotsi.DotsiDict)
<class 'dotsi.DotsiList'>
>>> type(d.users[0])    # dotsi.List (AKA dotsi.DotsiList)
<class 'dotsi.DotsiDict'> 
>>> 

Answer 37

A solution kind of delicate

class DotDict(dict):

    __setattr__ = dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__ = dict.__delitem__

    def __getattr__(self, key):

        def typer(candidate):
            if isinstance(candidate, dict):
                return DotDict(candidate)

            if isinstance(candidate, str):  # iterable but no need to iter
                return candidate

            try:  # other iterable are processed as list
                return [typer(item) for item in candidate]
            except TypeError:
                return candidate

            return candidate

        return typer(dict.get(self, key))