简体   繁体   English

为什么C#中的这种隐式类型转换失败?

[英]Why does this implicit type conversion in C# fail?

Background: 背景:

Let's assume I've got the following class: 假设我有以下课程:

class Wrapped<T> : IDisposable
{
    public Wrapped(T obj)  { /* ... */ }

    public static implicit operator Wrapped<T>(T obj)
    {
        return new Wrapped<T>(obj);
    }

    public void Dispose()  { /* ... */ }
}

As you can see, it provides an implicit type conversion operator for TWrapped<T> . 如您所见,它为TWrapped<T>提供了隐式类型转换运算符。 Ultimately, I would like to be able to use this class as follows: 最终,我希望能够如下使用此类:

interface IX  { /* ... */ }

class X : IX  { /* ... */ }

...

IX plainIX = new X();

using (Wrapped<IX> wrappedIX = plainIX)
{
    /* ... */
} 

Problem: 问题:

However, the type conversion in the above using clause fails. 但是,上述using子句中的类型转换失败。 While I can assign a new X() directly to wrappedIX , I am not allowed to assign anything of type IX to it. 尽管我可以直接向wrappedIX分配一个new X() ,但我不能为其分配任何类型为IX的东西。 The compiler will complain with the following error: 编译器将抱怨以下错误:

Compiler error CS0266: Cannot implicitly convert type 'IX' to 'Wrapped<IX>'. 编译器错误CS0266:无法将类型'IX'隐式转换为'Wrapped <IX>'。 An explicit onversion exists (are you missing a cast?) 存在明确的onversion(您是否缺少演员表?)

I don't understand this. 我不明白 What's the problem here? 这是什么问题

I believe it's because IX is an interface. 我相信这是因为IX是一个接口。 The compiler thinks that maybe a value of type IX could already be derived from Wrapped<IX> (even if Wrapped<T> is sealed) so it doesn't use the conversion. 编译器认为也许IX类型的值可能已经从Wrapped<IX>派生了(即使Wrapped<T>被密封了),所以它不使用转换。

The details are quite complicated, in sections 6.4.3 and 6.4.4 of the C# 3.0 spec. 详细信息非常复杂,请参见C#3.0规范的6.4.3和6.4.4节。 Basically because IX is an interface, it's not "encompassed by" any types, which means a later step in 6.4.4 fails. 基本上因为IX是一个接口,所以它不会被任何类型“包围”,这意味着6.4.4中的后续步骤将失败。

I suggest you create a non-generic type Wrapped with this method: 我建议您创建一个使用此方法Wrapped的非泛型类型:

public static Wrapped<T> Of<T>(T item)
{
    return new Wrapped<T>(item);
}

Then you can just write: 然后,您可以编写:

using (Wrapped<IX> wrappedIX = Wrapped.Of(plainIX))

Basically conversions can be a bit tricky for various reasons - simple methods are generally easier to understand, IMO. 出于各种原因,转换基本上会有些棘手-IMO通常会更容易理解简单的方法。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM