我应该如何使用VB.NET？

Question

Are all of these equal? Under what circumstances should I choose each over the others?

• var.ToString()

• CStr(var)

• CType(var, String)

• DirectCast(var, String)

---

EDIT: Suggestion from NotMyself …

• TryCast(var, String)

Answer 1

Those are all slightly different, and generally have an acceptable usage.

• var. ToString () is going to give you the string representation of an object, regardless of what type it is. Use this if var is not a string already.
• CStr (var) is the VB string cast operator. I'm not a VB guy, so I would suggest avoiding it, but it's not really going to hurt anything. I think it is basically the same as CType .
• CType (var, String) will convert the given type into a string, using any provided conversion operators.
• DirectCast (var, String) is used to up-cast an object into a string. If you know that an object variable is, in fact, a string, use this. This is the same as (string)var in C#.
• TryCast (as mentioned by @ NotMyself ) is like DirectCast , but it will return Nothing if the variable can't be converted into a string, rather than throwing an exception. This is the same as var as string in C#. The TryCast page on MSDN has a good comparison, too.

Answer 2

Cstr() is compiled inline for better performance.

CType allows for casts between types if a conversion operator is defined

ToString() Between base type and string throws an exception if conversion is not possible.

TryParse() From String to base typeif possible otherwise returns false

DirectCast used if the types are related via inheritance or share a common interface , will throw an exception if the cast is not possible, trycast will return nothing in this instance

Answer 3

I prefer the following syntax:

Dim number As Integer = 1
Dim str As String = String.TryCast(number)

If str IsNot Nothing Then

Hah you can tell I typically write code in C#. 8)

The reason I prefer TryCast is you do not have to mess with the overhead of casting exceptions. Your cast either succeeds or your variable is initialized to null and you deal with that accordingly.

Answer 4

MSDN seems to indicate that the Cxxx casts for specific types can improve performance in VB .NET because they are converted to inline code. For some reason, it also suggests DirectCast as opposed to CType in certain cases (the documentations states it's when there's an inheritance relationship; I believe this means the sanity of the cast is checked at compile time and optimizations can be applied whereas CType always uses the VB runtime.)

When I'm writing VB .NET code, what I use depends on what I'm doing. If it's prototype code I'm going to throw away, I use whatever I happen to type. If it's code I'm serious about, I try to use a Cxxx cast. If one doesn't exist, I use DirectCast if I have a reasonable belief that there's an inheritance relationship. If it's a situation where I have no idea if the cast should succeed (user input -> integers, for example), then I use TryCast so as to do something more friendly than toss an exception at the user.

One thing I can't shake is I tend to use ToString instead of CStr but supposedly Cstr is faster.

Answer 5

用户Konrad Rudolph 在Stack Overflow问题“VB.NET的隐藏特性”中提倡DirectCast（） 。

Answer 6

根据认证考试，您应尽可能使用Convert.ToXXX（）进行简单转换，因为它优于CXXX转换优化性能。

Answer 7

At one time, I remember seeing the MSDN library state to use CStr() because it was faster. I do not know if this is true though.