简体   繁体   English

一般而言,W3C有效的XHTML和CSS代码,语义和可访问标记足以满足站点的SEO吗?

[英]Is W3C Valid XHTML and CSS Code, Semantic and Accessible Mark-up enough for site's SEO in general?

I created a web-site for a client with W3C Valid XHTML and CSS Code, Semantic and Accessible Mark-up and I had said to client my code will be SEO friendly . 我使用W3C有效的XHTML和CSS代码,语义和可访问标记为客户创建了一个网站,我曾对客户说我的代码将是SEO友好的 Theyway i code it will be good for your site SEO. 我编码他们的方式将对您的网站SEO有益。 I putted my all efforts to make good code 我全力以赴编写好的代码

Now my non-techie Client is asking me, Should him go for any SEO company even after providing SEO friendly site by me? 现在,我的非技术客户正在问我,即使我提供了SEO友好网站,他仍应去任何SEO公司吗?

What other SEO companies will do for him other than what we can't by W3C Valid XHTML, CSS , Semantic and Accessible Mark-up? 除了W3C无法提供的有效XHTML,CSS,语义和可访问标记之外,其他SEO公司将为他做什么?

That depends on the SEO needs. 这取决于SEO的需求。 In general you don't have to do much at all, the search engines will still be able to find some information on the pages. 通常,您根本不需要做很多事情,搜索引擎仍然可以在页面上找到一些信息。 If you need the site to do really well in search engines, SEO frendliness is not enough, but it's a good start. 如果您需要该网站在搜索引擎中做得很好,那么SEO友好程度还不够,但这是一个不错的开始。

SEO is more than just making the information accessible, it's also about putting the right information in the right place. SEO不仅仅是使信息易于访问,还在于将正确的信息放置在正确的位置。 For example making the page title and headline correspond, and finding the right information to put in them to make search engines find them for the searches that you want. 例如,使页面标题和标题对应,并找到要放入的正确信息,以使搜索引擎为所需的搜索找到它们。

Valid HTML/CSS has very little, if any, bearing on SEO. 有效的HTML / CSS对SEO几乎没有影响。 Neither does a lot of semantic or accessible code either, but I'm guessing by that you mean you've use heading tags and the <title> tag where appropriate, used ordinary links with <a> tags (instead of behind Javascript/Flash). 很多语义或可访问的代码也都没有,但是我猜测您的意思是您已经在适当的地方使用了标题标签和<title>标签,并使用了带有<a>标签的普通链接(而不是在Javascript / Flash后面) )。 In which case, the on-page SEO is probably quite good. 在这种情况下,页面上的SEO可能相当不错。

But a large proportion of SEO comes from 'off-page' factors like how many links point to the site. 但是SEO的很大一部分来自“页外”因素,例如指向该站点的链接数量。 An SEO expert would probably look at gaining as many in-links as possible, adding the site to web directories and trying to promote the site in various other ways (perhaps through Facebook/Twitter campaigns). SEO专家可能会考虑获取尽可能多的链接,将网站添加到Web目录中,并尝试以其他各种方式(例如通过Facebook / Twitter活动)来推广网站。

If your background isn't in marketing then you may not be able to do this very well and hiring an expert would be a good option. 如果您没有营销背景,那么您可能做得不好,因此聘请专家将是一个不错的选择。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

相关问题 W3C的“语义数据提取器”在语义上正确的XHTML CSS开发中有什么用? - What is usefulness of W3C's “Semantic Data Extractor” in semantically correct XHTML CSS Development? 在W3C验证程序中测试任何xhtml CSS代码段有效性的最快方法是什么? - What is the quickest way to test validity of any xhtml css code snippet in W3C validator? 什么是用图像按钮编写一个简单的搜索输入框的最佳可访问且W3C有效的方法? - What is the best accessible and W3C valid way to code a one simple search input box with image button? W3C无效的HTML和CSS代码对SEO有害并且屏幕阅读器用户有问题吗? - Is W3C invalid HTML and CSS code harmful for SEO and problematic for screen reader users? 当前推荐的HTML / XHTML / CSS W3C版本是什么? - What are the current HTML/XHTML/CSS W3C recommended versions? 添加W3C有效CSS时Internet Explorer 7冻结 - Internet Explorer 7 freezing when W3C valid CSS is added 如何制作跨浏览器,W3C有效,语义,非javascript ROUND角落? - How to make a cross browser, W3C valid, semantic, non-javascript ROUND corner? css上的W3C错误 - W3C error on css 超链接和有效的W3C标记 - Hyperlinks and valid W3C markup 甚至W3c在独角兽验证器中也不有效? - Even W3c is not Valid in unicorn validator?
 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM