如何优化大内存数据库的分页

Question

I have an application where the entire database is implemented in memory using a stl-map for each table in the database.

Each item in the stl-map is a complex object with references to other items in the other stl-maps.

The application works with a large amount of data, so it uses more than 500 MByte RAM. Clients are able to contact the application and get a filtered version of the entire database. This is done by running through the entire database, and finding items relevant for the client.

When the application have been running for an hour or so, then Windows 2003 SP2 starts to page out parts of the RAM for the application (Eventhough there is 16 GByte RAM on the machine).

After the application have been partly paged out then a client logon takes a long time (10 mins) because it now generates a page fault for each pointer lookup in the stl-map. If running the client logon a second time right after then it is fast (few secs) because all the memory is now back in RAM.

I can see it is possible to tell Windows to lock memory in RAM, but this is generally only recommended for device drivers, and only for "small" amounts of memory.

I guess a poor mans solution could be to loop through the entire memory database, and thus tell Windows we are still interested in keeping the datamodel in RAM.

I guess another poor mans solution could be to disable the pagefile completely on Windows.

I guess the expensive solution would be a SQL database, and then rewrite the entire application to use a database layer. Then hopefully the database system will have implemented means to for fast access.

Are there other more elegant solutions ?

Answer 1

This sounds like either a memory leak, or a serious fragmentation problem. It seems to me that the first step would be to figure out what's causing 500 Mb of data to use up 16 Gb of RAM and still want more.

Edit: Windows has a working set trimmer that actively attempts to page out idle data. The basic idea is that it goes through and marks pages as being available, but leaves the data in them (and the virtual memory manager knows what data is in them). If, however, you attempt to access that memory before it's allocated to other purposes, it'll be marked as being in use again, which will normally prevent it from being paged out.

If you really think this is the source of your problem, you can indirectly control the working set trimmer by calling SetProcessWorkingSetSize . At least in my experience, this is only rarely of much use, but you may be in one of those unusual situations where it's really helpful.

Answer 2

As @Jerry Coffin said, it really sounds like your actual problem is a memory leak. Fix that.

But for the record, none of your "poor mans solutions" would work. At all.

Windows pages out some of your data because there's not room for it in RAM . Looping through the entire memory database would load in every byte of the data model, yes... which would cause other parts of it to be paged out. In the end, you'd generate a lot of page faults, and the only difference in the end would be which parts of the data structure are paged out.

Disabling the page file? Yes, if you think a hard crash is better than low performance. Windows doesn't page data out because it's fun. It does that to handle situations where it would otherwise run out of memory. If you disable the pagefile, the app will just crash when it would otherwise page out data.

If your dataset really is so big it doesn't fit in memory, then I don't see why an SQL database would be especially "expensive". Unlike your current solution, databases are optimized for this purpose. They're meant to handle datasets too large to fit in memory, and to do this efficiently.

It sounds like you have a memory leak. Fixing that would be the elegant, efficient and correct solution.

If you can't do that, then either

• throw more RAM at the problem (the app ends up using 16GB? Throw 32 or 64GB at it then), or
• switch to a format that's optimized for efficient disk access (A SQL database probably)

Answer 3

---- Edit

Given snakefoot explanation, the problem is swapping out memory that is not used for a longer period of time and due to this not having the data in memory when needed. This is the same as this:

Can I tell Windows not to swap out a particular processes' memory?

and VirtualLock function should do its job:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366895(VS.85).aspx

---- Previous answer

First of all you need to distinguish between memory leak and memory need problems.

If you have a memory leak then it would be bigger effort to convert entire application to SQL than to debug the application.

SQL cannot be faster then a well designed, domain specific in-memory database and if you have bugs, chances are you will have different ones in an SQL version as well.

If this is a memory need problem, then you will need to switch to SQL anyway and this sounds like a good moment.

Answer 4

We have a similar problem and the solution we choose was to allocate everything in a shared memory block. AFAIK, Windows doesn't page this out. However, using stl-map here is not for faint of heart either and was beyond what we required.

We are using Boost Shared Memory to implement this for us and it works well. Follow examples closely and you will be up and running quickly. Boost also has Boost.MultiIndex that will do a lot of what you want.

For a no cost sql solution have you looked at Sqlite ? They have an option to run as an in memory database.

Good luck, sounds like an interesting application.

Answer 5

I have an application where the entire database is implemented in memory using a stl-map for each table in the database.

That's the start of the end: STL's std::map is extremely memory inefficient. Same applies to std::list. Every element would be allocated separately causing rather serious memory waste. I often use std::vector + sort() + find() instead of std::map in applications where it is possible (more searches than modifications) and I know in advance memory usage might become an issue.

When the application have been running for an hour or so, then Windows 2003 SP2 starts to page out parts of the RAM for the application (Eventhough there is 16 GByte RAM on the machine).

Hard to tell without knowing how your application is written. Windows has the feature to unload from RAM whatever memory of idle applications can be unloaded. But that normally affects memory mapped files and alike.

Otherwise, I would strongly suggest to read up the Windows memory management documentation . It is not very easy to understand, yet Windows has all sorts and types of memory available to applications. I never had luck with it, but probably in your application using custom std::allocator would work.

Answer 6

I can believe it is the fault of flawed pagefile behaviour -i've run my laptops mostly with pagefile turned off since nt4.0. In my experience, at least up to XP Pro, Windows intrusively swaps pages out just to provide the dubious benefit of having a really-really-slow extension to the maximum working set space.

Ask what benefit swapping to harddisk is achieving with 16 Gigabityes of real RAM available? If your working set it so big as to need more virtual memory than +10 Gigs, then once swapping is actualy required processes will take anything from a bit longer, to thousands of times longer to complete. On Windows the untameable file system cache seems to antagonise the relationships.

Now when I (very) occasionaly run out of working set on my XP laptops, there is no traffic jam, the guilty app just crashes. A utility to suspend memory glugging processes before that time and make an alert would be nice, but there is no such thing just a violation, a crash, and sometimes explorer.exe goes down too.

Pagefiles - who needs em'