简体   繁体   English

有没有办法禁用默认的表格布局?

[英]Is there a way to disable default formtastic layout?

For one specific case I would like to render the form as a part of (for in-place editing). 对于一个特定的情况,我想将表单呈现为一部分(用于就地编辑)。 Is there a way in formtastic to disable the layout generated by .inputs / .buttons? 有没有一种形式上的方法来禁用.inputs / .buttons生成的布局? Instead a 而是

<fieldset> <ol> <li> 

i would like simply to wrap the fields in the 我只想将字段包装在

<td>

Is there a build-in way or any solution to this problem? 是否有内置方法或任何解决此问题的方法?

There's no built in way (yet) in Formtastic to change the mark-up. 在Formtastic中,还没有内置的方式可以更改标记。 Either use CSS to tweak the ample mark-up hooks in place, or ditch Formtastic for this form and code your own way (like we used to). 您可以使用CSS来调整适当的标记挂钩,也可以放弃Formtastic来编写此表单并以自己的方式编写代码(就像我们以前一样)。

In rails you can overrite the functions that define the tags that are used to render elements: 在rails中,您可以覆盖定义用于渲染元素的标签的函数:

config/initializers/formtastic_foundation.rb: config / initializers / formtastic_foundation.rb:

# change required fields advice tag (abbr -> span)
Formtastic::FormBuilder.required_string =
proc { Formtastic::Util.html_safe(%{<span title="#{Formtastic::I18n.t(:required)}">*</span>}) }

module Formtastic
  module Helpers
    # change field wrapper (ol -> div)
    module FieldsetWrapper
      protected
      def field_set_and_list_wrapping(*args, &block) #:nodoc:
        contents = args.last.is_a?(::Hash) ? '' : args.pop.flatten
        html_options = args.extract_options!

        if block_given?
          contents = if template.respond_to?(:is_haml?) && template.is_haml?
          template.capture_haml(&block)
          else
            template.capture(&block)
          end
        end

        contents = contents.join if contents.respond_to?(:join)

        legend = field_set_legend(html_options)
          fieldset = template.content_tag(:fieldset,
          Formtastic::Util.html_safe(legend) << template.content_tag(:div, Formtastic::Util.html_safe(contents)),
          html_options.except(:builder, :parent, :name)
        )

        fieldset
      end
    end
  end

  module Inputs
    module Base
      # change input wrapper tag (li.default_clases -> div.large-12.columns inside div.row)
      module Wrapping
        def input_wrapping(&block)
          def super_wrapper_html_options
            {:class => 'row'}
          end

          new_class = [wrapper_html_options[:class], "large-12 columns"].compact.join(" ")

          template.content_tag(:div,
            template.content_tag(:div,
              [template.capture(&block), error_html, hint_html].join("\n").html_safe,
              wrapper_html_options.merge(:class => new_class)),
            super_wrapper_html_options)
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

I use this code to integrate Formtastic 3 with Foundation 5.4.5 我使用此代码将Formtastic 3与Foundation 5.4.5集成在一起

It's not yet supported, however you can use forked formtastic version: https://github.com/linoj/formtastic 尚不支持,但是您可以使用派生的formtastic版本: https : //github.com/linoj/formtastic

More details at: http://www.vaporbase.com/postings/Replaceable_render_engines_for_Formtastic 更多详细信息,请访问: http//www.vaporbase.com/postings/Replaceable_render_engines_for_Formtastic

Read on the formtastic forum that it might be even merge to origin someday. 在正式论坛上阅读,有一天它甚至可能合并为起源。

I wrapped my call to the formtastic bit (in my haml file) in a string and then subbed out the 我将对格式化的位(在haml文件中)的调用包装在字符串中,然后消除了

= "#{f.input ...}".gsub('<li class=', '<fart class=').html_safe #remove the li to align this input with the other text in the table. 

It's a might bit easier than re-writing the form without formtastic, and it worked perfectly. 这可能比不使用formstic重写表单要容易一些,并且效果很好。

Admittedly it's a not an ideal solution. 诚然,这不是一个理想的解决方案。 For a one off though... I can live with it. 对于一个关闭...我可以忍受。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM