使用模型绑定器在ASP.NET MVC中往返查看数据

Question

Let's say I have a form with the following "business object" in mind:

public class MyObject
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public User OtherUser { get; set; }
    public DateTime CreateDate { get; set; }
    public DateTime? StartDate { get; set; }
    public DateTime? EndDate { get; set; }
}

When the user enters data into any of the fields, I need to round-trip what they entered in order to allow them to correct any fat-fingerings and the like, without having to retype their response.

Because I cannot round-trip a value like 'Feb 31, 2011' in a DateTime field, I end up using an View Model object like this:

public class MyObjectViewModel
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string OtherUserName { get; set; }
    public string CreateDate { get; set; }
    public string StartDate { get; set; }
    public string EndDate { get; set; }
}

Ok, all is fine and dandy, I can get this to render exactly the same as the bare business object and the values round-trip when using the following pattern:

public ActionResult Create(FormCollection form)
{
    var model = new MyObjectViewModel();
    if (TryUpdateModel(model, form) && ModelState.IsValid)
    {
         // ...
    }

    return View(model);
}

I having the following questions:

1. What is the cleanest way to get the data out of the View Model and into the Business Object? (ie What fills out the rest of the method above?)
2. Can I reduce the duplication of field names between the objects, so as to consolidate my changes?
3. In the above example, the field OtherUserName is a string that needs to be converted into a User object. Whose responsibility is this? The Controller? The ViewModel? A model binder?

Answer 1

1. AutoMapper
2. You don't need to.
3. The mapper

Example:

[HttpPut]
public ActionResult Create(MyObjectViewModel viewModel)
{
    if (!ModelState.IsValid)
    {
        // there are validation errors => redisplay the view
        return View(viewModel);
    }
    var model = Mapper.Map<MyObjectViewModel, MyObject>(viewModel);
    _repository.DoSomethingWithTheModel(model);
    return RedirectToAction("Success")
}

Answer 2

Your problem is caused mostly by allowing the view model to contain invalid data. Use the same strong type on your view model as on your data class, add a little javascript validation and "Feb 31" will never make it to the server. Parsing the types is definitely the responsibility of the model binder - you don't need to do anything, your controller action just gets passed a strongly typed model object. User may be a little different though - the primary difference may be that your viewmodel has a field named username and the data model needs a user object with information that wasn't on the form. Your controller would need to fetch/create the appropriate user object and add it to the data class.

You will still have some validation happening server side after the model is parsed, but that will be the more custom stuff like checking that fields are consistent with each other rather than simple string format issues.

For reducing duplication, I posted my style of models on another question - asp.mvc model design

Answer 3

1) You can strongly type your view so that the view passes the controller a "MyObject" type. 2) Not sure I understand what you are asking 3) Why not make this field an ID that contains the foreign key of the linked ID?

Also - there is no reason why a datetime field cant be passed to the view and back left as is. You don't need to pass it as a string and convert.

PS - I'd recommend looking at this tutorial - should clarify my answers for you.

http://www.asp.net/mvc/videos/what-is-aspnet-mvc-80-minute-technical-video-for-developers-building-nerddinner