简体   繁体   English

RSpec场景概述:多个测试用例

[英]RSpec Scenario Outlines: Multiple Test Cases

What's the best way to test a bunch of different test cases with RSpec? 使用RSpec测试一堆不同测试用例的最佳方法是什么?

For example, given string-additions.rb : 例如,给定string-additions.rb

require 'rspec'

class String
  if method_defined? :reverse_words
    raise "String#reverse_words is already defined"
  end
  def reverse_words
    split(' ').reverse!.join(' ')
  end
end

describe String do
  describe "#reverse_words" do
    specify { "hello".reverse_words.should eq("hello") }
    specify { "hello world".reverse_words.should eq("world hello") }
    specify { "bob & pop run".reverse_words.should eq("run pop & bob") }
  end
end

when I run rspec string-additions.rb --color --format doc , I get: 当我运行rspec string-additions.rb --color --format doc ,我得到:

String
  #reverse_words
    should == hello
    should == world hello
    should == run pop & bob

However, I'd like to get sensible output, like this: 但是,我希望获得合理的输出,如下所示:

String
  #reverse_words
    "hello" => "hello"
    "hello world" => "world hello"
    "bob & pop run" => "run pop & bob"

And, I'd like to DRY up my specs a bit. 而且,我想稍微干掉我的规格。 Does RSpec provide a template for DRYing up this sort of multiple-case testing? RSpec是否提供了用于干预这种多案例测试的模板? Something similar to Cucumber scenario outlines ? 类似黄瓜情景的概述

Note: This question is similar to Is there an equivalent in RSpec to Cucumber's “Scenarios” or am I using RSpec the wrong way? 注意:这个问题类似于RSpec与Cucumber的“场景”中的等价物,还是我使用RSpec的方式错误? but provides an example that should be tested with RSpec rather than Cucumber. 但提供了一个应该用RSpec而不是Cucumber测试的例子。

After reading Elisabeth Hendrickson's Adventures with Auto-Generated Tests and RSpec , I came up with this solution: 在阅读了Elisabeth Hendrickson的自动生成测试和RSpec冒险之后,我想出了这个解决方案:

describe String do
  describe "#reverse_words" do
    strings = {
      "hello"         => "hello",
      "hello world"   => "world hello",
      "bob & pop run" => "run pop & bob"
    }

    strings.each do |k, v|
      specify "\"#{k}\" => \"#{v}\"" do
        k.reverse_words.should eq(v)
      end
    end
  end
end

This gives the output I want, but it'd be nicer if RSpec had a template to make things even DRYer. 这给出了我想要的输出,但是如果RSpec有一个模板可以让事情变得更干净,那就更好了。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM