[英]Can we use user-defined (non-scalar) SQL-types for ORM?
I'm wondering if its possible to do ORM using SQL.2003 object types (aka STRUCTs, aka non-scalar types).我想知道是否可以使用 SQL.2003 object 类型(又名 STRUCT,又名非标量类型)来执行 ORM。
The idea behind that is to avoid the "n+1 selects" problem by retrieving complete objects directly from the database.其背后的想法是通过直接从数据库中检索完整对象来避免 “n+1 选择”问题。 Sort of eager "FetchMode.JOIN", but in the database .有点急切的“FetchMode.JOIN”,但在数据库中。
Are there any ORM frameworks fpor Java or.Net which support SQL object types at all?是否有任何 ORM 框架适用于 Java 或 .Net 支持 SQL ZA8CFDE 类型FDE6911BD59EB2AC6696?
At least JDBC has the getObject method and I've also found an example of user-defined types in ADO.Net至少 JDBC 有getObject 方法,我还在ADO.Net 中找到了用户定义类型的示例
As an Oracle developer, I may be biased towards database-centric approaches and I also didn't use ORM before.作为一名 Oracle 开发人员,我可能偏向于以数据库为中心的方法,而且我之前也没有使用过 ORM。 But Oracle features Object Views which let you compose objects from several relational tables.但是 Oracle 具有Object 视图,可让您从多个关系表中组合对象。 I bet these could be magnitudes faster than pulling all those single records out of the database, let alone issuing n+1 selects.我敢打赌,这可能比从数据库中提取所有这些单条记录要快得多,更不用说发出 n+1 个选择了。
I am the developer of jOOQ , and I am striving to make jOOQ exactly what you need.我是jOOQ的开发人员,我正在努力使 jOOQ 完全符合您的需求。 jOOQ currently supports any of these Oracle features: jOOQ 目前支持以下任何 Oracle 功能:
More support will be added in the near future, for advanced Oracle concepts such as在不久的将来将添加更多支持,用于高级 Oracle 概念,例如
Object views are currently not supported in the way you described, but I'll clearly put them on the roadmap.您描述的方式当前不支持 Object 视图,但我会明确地将它们放在路线图上。
See more on http://www.jooq.org查看更多关于http://www.jooq.org
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.