简体繁体 English

我应该使用jQuery模板吗？

[英]Should I use jQuery Templates?

原文 2011-05-06 22:37:10 0 2 jquery/ ajax/ jquery-templates

I have a page where search results are loaded from an XHR response. 我有一个页面，其中从XHR响应加载搜索结果。 What are the advantages of using jQuery templates to display search results in this situation, rather than using a more conventional approach with .html() or .load()? 在这种情况下，使用jQuery模板显示搜索结果有什么好处，而不是使用.html（）或.load（）的更常规方法？

2 个解决方案

Using templates allow you to keep a lot of escaped markup outside of Javascript code. 使用模板可让您在Javascript代码之外保留许多转义的标记。 Most Javascript solutions now use the technique (first documented, as far as I know, by John Resig ): you put the template markup inside a script tag with a type attribute set to text/html (or some other content-type unrecognized by the browser text/tmpl , text/jstmpl , whatever). 现在，大多数Javascript解决方案都使用该技术（据我所知，最早由John Resig记录）：您将模板标记放入一个script标记中，其type属性设置为text/html （或其他一些无法识别的内容类型）浏览器text/tmpl ， text/jstmpl等）。

As for the specific choice of jQuery templating , this is a matter of some discussion. 至于jQuery模板的具体选择，这是一些讨论的问题。 For a while it looked like that code was going to become a part of the core jQuery code, but apparently that's off the agenda. 一段时间以来，该代码似乎将成为jQuery核心代码的一部分，但显然这不在议程之列。

(There are many alternative templating libraries, though -- personally I like Mustache because it's been ported to many languages besides Javascript, which I find useful.) （不过，还有许多其他的模板库-我个人很喜欢Mustache，因为除了Javascript（我认为它很有用）之外，它还已移植到许多语言。）

The main advantages are: 主要优点是：

Using a template engine makes it easy to separate out what's being displayed from how it's being displayed. 使用模板引擎可以轻松地将显示的内容与显示的内容分开。
You can reuse templates, if you need them in different scenarios 如果在不同情况下需要模板，则可以重复使用模板

The main disadvantage of a javascript templating engine is the overhead of execution, but it's only a problem if your template is big. javascript模板引擎的主要缺点是执行开销，但是如果模板很大，这只是一个问题。

Hope this helps. 希望这可以帮助。 Cheers 干杯