[英]Need a map from enum (class) to std::binary_function
I have this enum (class)我有这个枚举(类)
enum class conditional_operator
{
plus_op,
or_op,
not_op
}
And I'd like a std::map
that represents these mappings:我想要一个代表这些映射的std::map
:
std::map<conditional_operator, std::binary_function<bool,bool,bool>> conditional_map =
{ { conditional_operator::plus_op, std::logical_and<bool> },
{ conditional_operator::or_op, std::logical_or<bool>},
{ conditional_operator::not_op, std::binary_negate<bool>} // this seems fishy too, binary_negate is not really what I want :(
Apart from the fact that this doesn't compile:除了这不能编译的事实之外:
error: expected primary-expression before '}' token错误:“}”标记之前的预期主表达式
error: expected primary-expression before '}' token错误:“}”标记之前的预期主表达式
error: expected primary-expression before '}' token错误:“}”标记之前的预期主表达式
for each of the three lines, how should I do this?对于三行中的每一行,我应该怎么做? I think a logical_not with a second dummy argument would work, once I get this to compile of course...我认为带有第二个虚拟参数的logical_not会起作用,当然,一旦我得到它来编译......
EDIT: Could I use lambda's for this?编辑:我可以为此使用 lambda 吗?
You really want std::function<bool(bool, bool)>
, not std::binary_function<bool, bool, bool>
.你真的想要std::function<bool(bool, bool)>
,而不是std::binary_function<bool, bool, bool>
。 That only exists for typedefs and stuff in C++03.这只存在于 C++03 中的 typedef 和东西。 Secondly, I'd just use a lambda- they're short enough and much clearer.其次,我只使用 lambda - 它们足够短且更清晰。 The std::logical_and
and stuff only exists for C++03 function object creation, and I'd use a lambda over them any day. std::logical_and
和东西只存在于 C++03 function object 创建,我会在任何一天使用 lambda 。
std::map<conditional_operator, std::function<bool(bool,bool)>> conditional_map =
{
{ conditional_operator::plus_op, [](bool a, bool b) { return a && b; } },
{ conditional_operator::or_op, [](bool a, bool b) { return a || b; } },
{ conditional_operator::not_op, [](bool a, bool b) { return !a; } }
};
Wait- what exact operator are you referring to with not?等等 - 你指的是哪个确切的运营商? Because that's unary, as far as I know.因为这是一元的,据我所知。
@DeadMG's answer is spot-on but if you insist on using the predefined function objects, you need to instantiate them. @DeadMG 的答案很明确,但如果您坚持使用预定义的 function 对象,则需要实例化它们。 At the moment you're just passing their type names.目前你只是传递他们的类型名称。
That is, you need to write std::logical_***<bool>()
instead of just std::logical_***<bool>
.也就是说,您需要编写std::logical_***<bool>()
而不仅仅是std::logical_***<bool>
。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.