在C＃中使用一对（三重等）值作为一个值的最佳方法是什么？

Question

That is, I'd like to have a tuple of values.

The use case on my mind:

Dictionary<Pair<string, int>, object>

or

Dictionary<Triple<string, int, int>, object>

Are there built-in types like Pair or Triple? Or what's the best way of implementing it?

Update There are some general-purpose tuples implementations described in the answers, but for tuples used as keys in dictionaries you should additionaly verify correct calculation of the hash code. Some more info on that in another question .

Update 2 I guess it is also worth reminding, that when you use some value as a key in dictionary, it should be immutable.

Answer 1

Builtin Classes

In certain specific cases, the .net framework already provides tuple-like classes that you may be able to leverage.

Pairs and Triples

The generic System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair class could be used as an adhoc pair implementation. This is the class that the generic Dictionary uses internally.

Alternatively, you may be able to make do with the System.Collections.DictionaryEntry structure that acts as a rudimentary pair and has the advantage of being available in mscorlib. On the down side, however, is that this structure is not strongly typed.

Pairs and Triples are also available in the form of the System.Web.UI.Pair and System.Web.UI.Triplet classes. Even though theses classes live in the the System.Web assembly they might be perfectly suitable for winforms development. However, these classes are not strongly typed either and might not be suitable in some scenarios, such as a general purposed framework or library.

Higher order tuples

For higher order tuples, short of rolling your own class, there may not be a simple solution.

If you have installed the F# language , you could reference the FSharp.Core.dll that contains a set of generic immutable Microsoft.Fsharp.Core.Tuple classes up to generic sextuples. However, even though an unmodified FSharp.Code.dll can be redistributed, F# is a research language and a work in progress so this solution is likely to be of interest only in academic circles.

If you do not want to create your own class and are uncomfortable referencing the F# library, one nifty trick could consist in extending the generic KeyValuePair class so that the Value member is itself a nested KeyValuePair.

For instance, the following code illustrates how you could leverage the KeyValuePair in order to create a Triples:

int id = 33;
string description = "This is a custom solution";
DateTime created = DateTime.Now;

KeyValuePair<int, KeyValuePair<string, DateTime>> triple =
   new KeyValuePair<int, KeyValuePair<string, DateTime>>();
triple.Key = id;
triple.Value.Key = description;
triple.Value.Value = created;

This allows to extend the class to any arbitrary level as is required.

KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<string, string>, string>, string> quadruple =
    new KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<string, string>, string>, string>();
KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<string, string>, string>, string>, string> quintuple =
    new KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<string, string>, string>, string>, string>();

Roll Your Own

In other cases, you might need to resort to rolling your own tuple class, and this is not hard.

You can create simple structures like so:

struct Pair<T, R>
{
    private T first_;
    private R second_;

    public T First
    {
        get { return first_; }
        set { first_ = value; }
    }

    public R Second
    {
        get { return second_; }
        set { second_ = value; }
    }
}

Frameworks and Libraries

This problem has been tackled before and general purpose frameworks do exist. Below is a link to one such framework:

• Tuple Library by Michael L Perry .

Answer 2

public struct Pair<T1, T2>
{
    public T1 First;
    public T2 Second;
}

public struct Triple<T1, T2, T3>
{
    public T1 First;
    public T2 Second;
    public T3 Third;
}

Answer 3

Fast-forward to 2010, .NET 4.0 now supports n-tuples of arbitrary n . These tuples implement structural equality and comparison as expected.

Answer 4

Pair and Triplet are existing classes in .net see msdn:

Triplet

Pair

I recently came across them, while playing around with viewstate decoding

Answer 5

I have implemented a tuple library in C#. Visit http://www.adventuresinsoftware.com/generics/ and click on the "tuples" link.

Answer 6

I usually just create my own struct, containing the values. It's often a bit more readable ;)

Answer 7

KeyValuePair is the best class to extend if you don't want to create your own classes.

int id = 33;
string description = "This is a custom solution";
DateTime created = DateTime.Now;

KeyValuePair<int, KeyValuePair<string, DateTime>> triple =
   new KeyValuePair<int, KeyValuePair<string, DateTime>>();
triple.Key = id;
triple.Value.Key = description;
triple.Value.Value = created;

You can extend it to as many levels as you want.

KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<string, string>, string, string> quadruple =
   new KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<KeyValuePair<string, string>, string, string>();

Note : The classes Triplet and Pair exists inside the System.Web -dll, so it's not very suitable for other solutions than ASP.NET.

Answer 8

You can relatively easily create your own tuple classes, the only thing that potentially gets messy is your equality and hashcode overrides (essential if you're going to use them in dictionaries).

It should be noted that .Net's own KeyValuePair<TKey,TValue> struct has relatively slow equality and hashcode methods .

Assuming that isn't a concern for you there is still the problem that the code ends up being hard to figure out:

public Tuple<int, string, int> GetSomething() 
{
    //do stuff to get your multi-value return
}

//then call it:
var retVal = GetSomething();

//problem is what does this mean?
retVal.Item1 / retVal.Item3; 
//what are item 1 and 3?

In most of these cases I find it easier to create a specific record class (at least until C#4 makes this compiler-magic)

class CustomRetVal {
    int CurrentIndex { get; set; }
    string Message { get; set; }
    int CurrentTotal { get; set; }
}

var retVal = GetSomething();

//get % progress
retVal.CurrentIndex / retVal.CurrentTotal;

Answer 9

One simple solution has no been mentioned yet. You can also just use a List<T> . It's built in, efficient and easy to use. Granted, it looks a bit weird at first, but it does its job perfectly, especially for a larger count of elements.

Answer 10

NGenerics - the popular .Net algorithms and data structures library, has recently introduced immutable data structures to the set.

The first immutable ones to implement were pair and tuple classes. The code is well covered with tests and is quite elegant. You can check it here . They are working on the other immutable alternatives at the moment and they should be ready shortly.

Answer 11

没有内置的ins，但是Pair <T，R>类很容易创建。

Answer 12

是的，有System.Web.UI.Pair和System.Web.UI.Triplet（它有一个重载的对象类型行为的创建者！）

Answer 13

对于第一种情况，我通常使用

Dictionary<KeyValuePair<string, int>, object>

Answer 14

There are not built-in classes for that. You can use KeyValuePair or roll out your own implementation.

Answer 15

You could use System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair as your Pair implementation.

Or you could just implement your own, they aren't hard:

public class Triple<T, U, V>
{
  public T First {get;set;}
  public U Second {get;set;}
  public V Third {get;set;}
}

Of course, you may someday run into a problem that Triple(string, int, int) is not compatible with Triple(int, int, string). Maybe go with System.Xml.Linq.XElement instead.

Answer 16

There are also the Tuple<> types in F#; you just need to reference FSharp.Core.dll.