[英]Simplify java if statement
Can I simplify this java if construct? 如果构造,我可以简化这个java吗? It seems too verbose to me, I'd like to have it shorter. 对我来说似乎太冗长了,我想让它更短。
A is persistent Object, which will be null if it's context is accessed first time. A是持久性Object,如果第一次访问它的上下文,它将为null。 Than A is instatniated and given content, and if this fails, some backup content is given to A. 比A是instatniated和给定内容,如果失败,一些备份内容给A。
if (A == null) {
A = staticGetMethod();
if (A == null) A = new BackupAContent() { ... };
}
Update: Or you could simply remove the nesting as it will still behave the same way. 更新:或者您可以简单地删除嵌套,因为它仍然会以相同的方式运行。
if (A == null) {
A = staticGetMethod();
}
if (A == null) {
new BackupAContent() { ... };
}
Should work: 应该管用:
if (A == null && (A = staticGetMethod()) == null) {
new BackupAContent() { ... };
}
Put your building logic in factory method 将您的构建逻辑放在工厂方法中
if (objA == null) {
objA = getAInstance();
}
encapsulate the code suggested by Charles into a method to implement Factory_method_pattern 将Charles建议的代码封装到实现Factory_method_pattern的方法中
You can use a ternary operator instead of the if
statements: 您可以使用三元运算符而不是if
语句:
a = a ? a : staticGetMethod();
a = a ? a : new BackupAContent();
That said, I'd stick with what you've got, to be honest -- except that I would add a block for the second conditional rather than putting the statement inline with it. 也就是说,我坚持你所拥有的,说实话 - 除了我会为第二个条件添加一个块而不是将该语句与其内联。
This is Charles Goodwin's code with a slight change: 这是查尔斯古德温的代码略有变化:
if (A == null && (A = staticGetMethod()) == null) {
new BackupAContent() { ... };
}
I used an AND instead of an OR 我使用AND而不是OR
I think this is the best way to do it: 我认为这是最好的方法:
if(A == null)
{
if((A = staticGetMethod()) == null) A = new BackupAContent() { ... };
}
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.