[英]Multiline syntax for piping a heredoc; is this portable?
I'm familiar with this syntax:我熟悉这种语法:
cmd1 << EOF | cmd2
text
EOF
but just discovered that bash allows me to write:但刚刚发现 bash 允许我写:
cmd1 << EOF |
text
EOF
cmd2
(the heredoc is used as input to cmd1, and the output of cmd1 is piped to cmd2). (heredoc 用作 cmd1 的输入,cmd1 的 output 通过管道传送到 cmd2)。 This seems like a very odd syntax.这似乎是一个非常奇怪的语法。 Is it portable?它是便携式的吗?
Yes, the POSIX standard allows this.是的,POSIX 标准允许这样做。 According to the 2008 version: 根据2008版:
The here-document shall be treated as a single word that begins after the next
<newline>
and continues until there is a line containing only the delimiter and a<newline>
, with no<blank>
characters in between. here-document 应被视为一个单词,从下一个<newline>
开始并一直持续到有一行仅包含分隔符和<newline>
,中间没有<blank>
字符。 Then the next here-document starts, if there is one.然后下一个 here-document 开始,如果有的话。
And includes this example of multiple "here-documents" in the same line:并在同一行中包含多个“here-documents”的示例:
cat <<eof1; cat <<eof2
Hi,
eof1
Helene.
eof2
So there is no problem doing redirections or pipes.所以做重定向或管道没有问题。 Your example is similar to something like this:您的示例类似于以下内容:
cat file |
cmd
And the shell grammar (further down on the linked page) includes these definitions: shell 语法(在链接页面的下方)包括以下定义:
pipe_sequence : command
| pipe_sequence '|' linebreak command
newline_list : NEWLINE
| newline_list NEWLINE
;
linebreak : newline_list
| /* empty */
So a pipe symbol can be followed by an end-of-line and still be considered part of a pipeline.因此,pipe 符号后面可以跟一个行尾,但仍被视为流水线的一部分。
Yes it's in the POSIX shell grammar.是的,它在 POSIX shell 语法中。 You can also have more than one here-doc for the same command (some other examples use two cat
invocations, but this works as well):对于同一个命令,您还可以有多个 here-doc (其他一些示例使用两个cat
调用,但这也适用):
cat <<EOF1 <<EOF2
first here-doc
EOF1
second here-doc
EOF2
This is contrived (using 2 here-docs for stdin), but if you think of providing input for different file descriptors it immediately makes sense.这是人为的(使用 2 个 here-docs 作为标准输入),但如果您考虑为不同的文件描述符提供输入,它立即有意义。
There's also the possibility to drop the cat
entirely .也有可能完全丢弃cat
。 Why not make the here-document directly available to cmd
:为什么不直接将 here-document 提供给cmd
:
cmd << EOF
input
here
EOF
Hmm, I suppose yes, according to the test in bash in POSIX mode:嗯,我想是的,根据 POSIX 模式下 bash 中的测试:
$ bash --posix
$ cat <<EOF |
> ahoj
> nazdar
> EOF
> sed 's/a/b/'
bhoj
nbzdar
Hi, check this, for example嗨,检查一下,例如
#!/bin/sh
( base32 -d | base64 -d )<<ENDOFTEXT
KNDWW42DNNSHS5ZXPJCG4MSVM5MVQVT2JFCTK3DELBFDCY2IIJYGE2JUJNHWS22LINVHQMCMNVFD
CWJQIIZVUV2JOVNEOVJLINTW6PIK
ENDOFTEXT
regards问候
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.