简体   繁体   English

C#/ WinForms / INotifyPropertyChanged:当一个或两个操作数可能为null时检查相等性的优雅方法

[英]C#/WinForms/INotifyPropertyChanged: Elegant way to check for equality when either or both operands might be null

I have a class Bar that implements INotifyPropertyChanged. 我有一个实现INotifyPropertyChanged的类Bar。 When setting the property CurrentFoo, I want to raise PropertyChanged if the value is changing. 设置属性CurrentFoo时,我想在值发生变化时引发PropertyChanged。 Foo implements IEquatable but not the == operator. Foo实现了IEquatable但不是==运算符。

Currently my code looks like this: 目前我的代码如下所示:

public class Bar : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    // ...

    private Foo fooValue;

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets or sets the active Foo
    /// </summary>
    /// <value>The active Foo.</value>
    public Foo CurrentFoo
    {
        get
        {
            return this.fooValue;
        }

        set
        {
            // Notify listeners if value is changing.
            if (null == this.fooValue && null != value
                || null != this.fooValue && null == value
                || null != this.fooValue && null != value && !this.fooValue.Equals(value))
            {
                this.fooValue = value;
                this.OnPropertyChanged("CurrentFoo");
            }
        }
    }

   // ...
}

And it woks, but...ugleh! 它开始了,但是......哎呀! Is there a more elegant/best-practices way of doing this check without restoring to the Null object pattern (inconsistent with the rest of our codebase)? 是否有一种更优雅/最佳实践的方法来执行此检查而无需恢复到Null对象模式(与我们的其余代码库不一致)?

I've considered writing a utility method like IsOneObjectNullButNotBoth(object a, object b)...but again, blah. 我考虑过编写一个像IsOneObjectNullButNotBoth(对象a,对象b)这样的实用工具方法......但是,再次,等等。 Surely I'm missing a handy-dandy class library method, though I already checked those. 当然我错过了一个方便的类库方法,虽然我已经检查过了。

Testing one of the values for null is enough, because the Equals method should return false if the argument is null: 测试null的一个值就足够了,因为如果参数为null,则Equals方法应该返回false:

if ((this.fooValue != value) ||
    (this.fooValue != null && !this.fooValue.Equals(value)))
{
    this.fooValue = value;
    this.OnPropertyChanged("CurrentFoo");
}

Alternatively, you can use the default EqualityComparer for Foo which checks for nulls and calls the Equals method: 或者,您可以使用默认的EqualityComparer for Foo来检查空值并调用Equals方法:

if (!EqualityComparer<Foo>.Default.Equals(this.FooValue, value))
{
    this.fooValue = value;
    this.OnPropertyChanged("CurrentFoo");
}

It seems like you could use an extension method here: 看起来你可以在这里使用扩展方法:

    if(fooValue.IsChanged(value))
    {
    }
    static public class Ext {
      static public bool IsChanged(this Foo fooValue, Foo value) {
        return null == fooValue && null != value 
          || null != this.fooValue 
          && null == value 
          || null != this.fooValue 
          && null != value 
          && !this.fooValue.Equals(value));
       }
    }

This is built into the .net framework and will do just this 这内置于.net框架中,并将执行此操作

if (!System.Collections.Generic.EqualityComparer<Foo>.Default.Equals(value, fooValue))
{
    // value changed logic here.
}

Well, may be this way: 好吧,可能就是这样:

Should work. 应该管用。

    public Foo CurrentFoo
    {
        get
        {
            return this.fooValue;
        }

        set
        {
            // Notify listeners if value is changing.
            bool bok = false;
            if (this.fooValue !=null && !this.fooValue.Equals(value))
                bok = true;
            else if(this.fooValue ==null)
                 bok = (this.fooValue == value);
            if(bok) {
                this.fooValue = value;
                this.OnPropertyChanged("CurrentFoo");
            }
        }
    }

This is how I would write it if I didn't want to use EqualityComparer : 如果我不想使用EqualityComparer这就是我写它的方式:

if ((obj1 ?? obj2) != null && (obj1 == null || !obj1.Equals(obj2)))
{
    // objects are diffrent
}

I think that's about as elegant as I can make it. 我认为这就像我能做到的一样优雅。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM