链接多个C源文件

Question

I'm on gentoo linux with GCC 4.4.5 installed. I can compile and link such program without any errors using , and the command returns result correctly.

[main.c] 
#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
    double c = ceil(2.5);
    printf("The ceil of 2.5 is %f\n", c);
    return 0;
}

But when I put the invokation of into another source file, the problem occurs.

[calc.h]
#ifndef _CALC_H_
#define _CALC_H_
double myceil(double n);
#endif

[calc.c]
#include <math.h>
#include "calc.h"
double myceil(double n)
{
    return ceil(n);
}

[main1.c]
#include <stdio.h>
#include "calc.h"
int main(void)
{
    double c = myceil(2.5);
    printf("The ceil of 2.5 is %f\n", c);
    return 0;
}

Using the command , such error occurs:

/tmp/cc6GhJvZ.o: In function `myceil':
calc.c:(.text+0x19): undefined reference to `ceil'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

So why did the annoying error "undefined references" happen in the latter case? And I know the error could be eliminated by adding an library , however, I just want to know why gcc will throw the error in the latter case.

Answer 1

My guess is that GCC optimizes ceil(2.5) to a constant, whereas ceil(n) is not constant because n is not known when compiling calc.c , and it needs to reference the function. You can confirm this by looking at the assembly output ( gcc -S ).

Here's what gcc 4.2.1 on x86 gave me for something similar to your first example:

.LC1:
    .string "%f\n"
    // [snip]
main:
    // [snip]
    fldl    .LC0
    fstpl   4(%esp)
    movl    $.LC1, (%esp)
    call    printf
    // [snip]
.LC0:
    .long   0
    .long   1074266112

Here we see printf being called with a double constant.

Now if I do something similar to your second example:

myceil:
    // [snip]
    fldl    -8(%ebp)
    fstpl   (%esp)
    call    ceil
    // [snip]

Here we see ceil being referenced.

So yeah. I'd say your call is being optimized to a constant in the one that works without -lm .

Answer 2

gcc has a list of built-in functions and ceil is one of them. On my version of OSX, gcc uses the built-in ceil in both of your cases so -lm is not necessary. Apparently your Gentoo compiler behaves differently and only uses the built-in ceil in some cases. If you try compiling with -fno-builtin then you'll have to use -lm for both of your compilations.

Answer 3

Does it work if you first compile main.c to main.o and calc.c to calc.o, then link those? That's normally what I would expect (linking object files rather than trying to compile multiple C files on a single command line).