atomic_thread_fence不是std的成员
[英]atomic_thread_fence is not a member of std
问题描述
Compiling with: 
编译：
g++ -std=c++0x -Wall -pthread test2.cc -o hello
I'm getting this error: 我收到此错误：
test2.cc: atomic_thread_fence is not a member of std
I am using g++ 4.5.2 in Ubuntu. 我在Ubuntu中使用g ++ 4.5.2。 What am I missing? 我想念什么？
1 个解决方案
解决方案1
1 2011-10-09 11:09:29
您在test2.cc中是否具有以下内容？
#include <atomic>
声明:本站的技术帖子网页，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要转载，请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.
相关问题
这种std :: atomic_thread_fence的使用是否正确？ - Is this use of std::atomic_thread_fence correct?
std :: __ Atomic_thread_fence（大写A）正确吗？ - std::_Atomic_thread_fence (with capital A) is this correct?
为什么这个 `std::atomic_thread_fence` 工作 - Why does this `std::atomic_thread_fence` work
为什么std :: atomic_thread_fence具有“ C”链接？ - Why does std::atomic_thread_fence have “C” linkage?
std :: atomic_thread_fence具有未定义的引用 - std::atomic_thread_fence has undefined reference
在具有相同顺序的原子加载/存储之前使用 std::atomic_thread_fence 总是多余的吗？ - Is using std::atomic_thread_fence right before an atomic load/store with the same order always redundant?
获取条件std :: atomic_thread_fence的优点和缺点是什么？ - Benefits & drawbacks of as-needed conditional std::atomic_thread_fence acquire?
在 x86 上实现 std::atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_seq_cst) 没有额外的性能损失 - An implementation of std::atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_seq_cst) on x86 without extra performance penalties
atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_release) 与使用memory_order_acq_rel 有什么不同？ - Is atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_release) different from using memory_order_acq_rel?
atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_seq_cst) 是否具有完整内存屏障的语义？ - Does atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_seq_cst) have the semantics of a full memory barrier?
相关标签