我需要一个对单个存储桶具有完全访问权限的 Amazon S3 用户

Question

I have a user foo with the following privileges (it's not a member of any group):

{
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Sid": "Stmt1308813201865",
      "Action": "s3:*",
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar"
    }
  ]
}

That user however seem unable to upload or do much of anything until I grant full access to authenticated users (which might apply to anyone). This still doesn't let the user change permission as boto is throwing an error after an upload when it tries to do do key.set_acl('public-read') .

Ideally this user would have full access to the bar bucket and nothing else, what am I doing wrong?

Answer 1

You need to grant s3:ListBucket permission to the bucket itself. Try the policy below.

{
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Action": "S3:*",
      "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar/*",
      "Condition": {}
    },
    {
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Action": [
        "s3:ListBucket"
      ],
      "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar",
      "Condition": {}
    }
  ]
}

Answer 2

The selected answer didn't work for me, but this one did:

{
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Action": "s3:*",
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Resource": [
        "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket",
        "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Action": "s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
      "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
    }
  ]
}

Credit: http://mikeferrier.com/2011/10/27/granting-access-to-a-single-s3-bucket-using-amazon-iam/

Answer 3

您了解AWS 策略生成器吗？

Answer 4

There is an official AWS documentation at Writing IAM Policies: How to Grant Access to an Amazon S3 Bucket

Just copy and paste the appropriate rule and change the "Resource" key to your bucket's ARN in all Statements.

For programamtic access the policy should be:

{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
            "Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bar"]
        },
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": [
                "s3:PutObject",
                "s3:PutObjectAcl",
                "s3:GetObject",
                "s3:GetObjectAcl",
                "s3:DeleteObject"
            ],
            "Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bar/*"]
        }
    ]
}

And for console access access should be:

{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": [
                "s3:GetBucketLocation",
                "s3:ListAllMyBuckets"
            ],
            "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar*"
        },
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
            "Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bar"]
        },
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": [
                "s3:PutObject",
                "s3:PutObjectAcl",
                "s3:GetObject",
                "s3:GetObjectAcl",
                "s3:DeleteObject"
            ],
            "Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bar/*"]
        }
    ]
}

Answer 5

That works for me:

{
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": [
                "s3:ListBucket",
                "s3:GetBucketLocation",
                "s3:ListBucketMultipartUploads",
                "s3:ListBucketVersions"
            ],
            "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bucket_name_here"
        },
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": [
                "s3:*Object*",
                "s3:ListMultipartUploadParts",
                "s3:AbortMultipartUpload"
            ],
            "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bucket_name_here/*"
        }
    ]
}

Answer 6

If you've been pulling your hair out because you cannot figure out why Cyberduck is not being able to set object ACLs but it works with another client (like Panic Transmit) here is the solution:

You need to add s3:GetBucketAcl to your Action list, eg:

{
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Sid": "Stmt1",
            "Action": [
                "s3:GetBucketAcl",
                "s3:ListBucket",
                "s3:DeleteObject",
                "s3:GetObject",
                "s3:GetObjectAcl",
                "s3:PutObject",
                "s3:PutObjectAcl"
            ],
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket-name"
        }
    ]
}

Of course you don't need to do this if you are less restrictive with s3:* but I think this is good to know.

Answer 7

@cloudberryman's answer is correct but I like to make things as short as possible. This answer can be reduced to:

{  
   "Statement":[  
      {  
         "Effect":"Allow",
         "Action":"S3:*",
         "Resource":[  
            "arn:aws:s3:::bar",
            "arn:aws:s3:::bar/*"
         ]
      }
   ]
}

Answer 8

{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": [
                        "s3:GetBucketLocation",
                        "s3:ListAllMyBuckets"
                      ],
            "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
        },
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": "s3:*",
            "Resource": [
                "arn:aws:s3:::YOUR-BUCKET",
                "arn:aws:s3:::YOUR-BUCKET/*"
            ]
        }
    ]
}

Answer 9

I have a user foo with the following privileges (it's not a member of any group):

{
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Sid": "Stmt1308813201865",
      "Action": "s3:*",
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar"
    }
  ]
}

That user however seem unable to upload or do much of anything until I grant full access to authenticated users (which might apply to anyone). This still doesn't let the user change permission as boto is throwing an error after an upload when it tries to do do key.set_acl('public-read') .

Ideally this user would have full access to the bar bucket and nothing else, what am I doing wrong?

Answer 10

Another way I was recently able to get this to work was using Amazon's documentation . The key for me was to point the IAM User to the specific bucket NOT the S3 console . Per the documentation, "Warning: After you change these permissions, the user gets an Access Denied error when they access the main Amazon S3 console. The main console link is similar to the following:

https://s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/home

Instead, the user must access the bucket using a direct console link to the bucket, similar to the following:

https://s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/awsexamplebucket/ "

My policy is below:

{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
    {
        "Sid": "Stmt1589486662000",
        "Effect": "Allow",
        "Action": [
            "s3:*"
        ],
        "Resource": [
            "arn:aws:s3:::AWSEXAMPLEBUCKET",
            "arn:aws:s3:::AWSEXAMPLEBUCKET/*"
        ]
    }
]
}