[英]How would I parse this XML String?
I have an XML string like this: 我有一个像这样的XML字符串:
<Summary>Foo</Summary><Description>Bar</Description>
I want to read this into a class object: 我想将此读入一个类对象:
class Foobar()
{
string Summary {get;set;}
string Description {get;set;}
}
I tried using XmlTextReader, but it throws an exception that no root element was found. 我尝试使用XmlTextReader,但是它引发了一个异常,即找不到根元素。 This is what I tried: 这是我试过的:
using (XmlTextReader reader = new XmlTextReader(new StringReader(comment)))
{
while (reader.Read())
//do something here
}
I also tried deserializing it directly into an object like this: 我还尝试过将其反序列化为这样的对象:
[XmlTypeAttribute]
public class Foobar
{
[XmlElementAttribute("Summary")]
public string Summary { get; set; }
[XmlElementAttribute("Description")]
public string Description { get; set; }
}
This fails as well because I cannot define a [XmlRootElement]
for the class Foobar, since there is no root element. 这也失败了,因为我没有为Foobar类定义[XmlRootElement]
,因为没有根元素。
You need to set root element for that your xaml would be 您需要为您的xaml设置根元素
<root>
<Summary>Foo</Summary><Description>Bar</Description>
</root>
For Rootelement in XMLSeralizatoion : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.xml.serialization.xmlrootattribute.aspx 对于XMLSeralizatoion中的Rootlement: http : //msdn.microsoft.com/zh-cn/library/system.xml.serialization.xmlrootattribute.aspx
Define a root element 定义根元素
<root>
<Summary>Foo</Summary>
<Description>Bar</Desciption>
</root>
The easiest way is probably to manually add a root element. 最简单的方法可能是手动添加根元素。
string xml = "<root>" + comment + "</root>";
Then you can parse it with whichever method you want. 然后,您可以使用所需的任何方法对其进行解析。
Use a constructor form that allows for XMLFragments (chunks of XML that could be valid if put into a single element, but which are not so-rooted): 使用允许XMLFragments的构造函数形式(如果将XML块放入单个元素中可能是有效的,但并非如此):
using (XmlTextReader reader = new XmlTextReader(comment, XmlNodeType.Element, null))
{
while (reader.Read())
//do something here
}
Better yet, use Create()
, which gives more flexibility still. 更好的是,使用Create()
,它仍然提供更多的灵活性。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.