启用日志记录到log4net中的两个不同位置

Question

I'm brand new to log4net, and I'm trying to maintain some legacy code that uses it. I've noticed that having two static classes that tell log4net to log to different locations are tripping over each other.

The classes each have a static constructor that looks like this

static Logger() {
    _Logger = new X.LoggingService.AppLogger(
                X.UtilityServer.Configuration.ConfigInfo.LoggerConfigFile);
}

except with different config values; both of these static classes are initializing the same AppLogger helper class. The second class to initialize is overwriting the initialization of the first. I think I've tracked the problem down to here:

private  ILog Log  {
    get {
        if (!_ConfiguratorSet) {
            _ConfiguratorSet = true;
            XmlConfigurator.Configure(new FileInfo(_ConfigFile)); //<--- STATIC
        }
        return _log; 
    }
}

Since I absolutely do not have to support thread safety , should I just get remove the if statement? Would calling XmlConfigurator.Configure every time I need to log something be prohibitively expensive? Is there a better way? This code was written using log4net version 1.2.10

Answer 1

Ideally, what shall be happening is:

1. Configure log4net (do this once at app start up - this is very slow)
2. Use dependency injection to pass ILog to the classes (better) or service locator (worse) to get the ILog in the needed class
3. One configuration can provide you with multiple loggers, which in turn can have multiple appenders that can log to various outputs (db, console, queues etc.) This gives you a lot of flexibility governed by one config file. You can have one config file with two file loggers with different names that will use two different appenders to output data, well, into two files.

The code

private  ILog Log  {
    get {
        if (!_ConfiguratorSet) {
            _ConfiguratorSet = true;
            XmlConfigurator.Configure(new FileInfo(_ConfigFile)); //<--- STATIC
        }
        return _log;
    }
}

is really confusing and wrong. You should only return a log there, so no ifs at all. It is a violation of single responsibility principle and possibly the reason of the bug you see.