简体   繁体   English

gcc调试符号(-g标志)vs链接器的-rdynamic选项

[英]gcc debug symbols (-g flag) vs linker's -rdynamic option

glibc provides backtrace() and backtrace_symbols() to get the stack trace of a running program. glibc提供了backtrace()backtrace_symbols()来获取正在运行的程序的堆栈跟踪。 But for this to work the program has to be built with linker's -rdynamic flag. 但为了实现这一点,程序必须使用链接器的-rdynamic标志构建。

What is the difference between -g flag passed to gcc vs linker's -rdynamic flag ? 是什么区别-g传递给GCC VS链接的标志-rdynamic标志? For a sample code I did readelf to compare the outputs. 对于示例代码,我做了readelf来比较输出。 -rdynamic seems to produce more info under Symbol table '.dynsym' But I am not quite sure what the additional info is. -rdynamic似乎在Symbol table '.dynsym'下产生更多信息但是我不太确定附加信息是什么。

Even if I strip a program binary built using -rdynamic , backtrace_symbols() continue to work. 即使我strip了使用-rdynamic构建的程序二进制文件, backtrace_symbols()也会继续工作。

When strip removes all the symbols from the binary why is it leaving behind whatever was added by the -rdynamic flag ? strip从二进制文件中删除所有符号时,为什么它会留下-rdynamic标志添加的内容?

Edit: Follow-up questions based on Mat's response below.. 编辑:基于Mat的回复的后续问题如下..

For the same sample code you took this is the difference I see with -g & -rdynamic 对于相同的示例代码,您使用的是与-g-rdynamic的区别

without any option.. 没有任何选择..

    Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 4 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
         0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND
         1: 0000000000000000   218 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (2)
         2: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
         3: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND __gmon_start__

    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 70 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
         0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND
         1: 0000000000400200     0 SECTION LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 
         2: 000000000040021c     0 SECTION LOCAL  DEFAULT    2 

with -g there are more sections, more entries in .symtab table but .dynsym remains the same.. -g有更多的部分, .symtab表中的更多条目,但.dynsym保持不变..

      [26] .debug_aranges    PROGBITS         0000000000000000  0000095c
           0000000000000030  0000000000000000           0     0     1
      [27] .debug_pubnames   PROGBITS         0000000000000000  0000098c
           0000000000000023  0000000000000000           0     0     1
      [28] .debug_info       PROGBITS         0000000000000000  000009af
           00000000000000a9  0000000000000000           0     0     1
      [29] .debug_abbrev     PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000a58
           0000000000000047  0000000000000000           0     0     1
      [30] .debug_line       PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000a9f
           0000000000000038  0000000000000000           0     0     1
      [31] .debug_frame      PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000ad8
           0000000000000058  0000000000000000           0     0     8
      [32] .debug_loc        PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000b30
           0000000000000098  0000000000000000           0     0     1

    Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 4 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
         0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND
         1: 0000000000000000   218 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (2)
         2: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
         3: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND __gmon_start__

    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 77 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
         0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND 
         1: 0000000000400200     0 SECTION LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 

with -rdynamic no additional debug sections, .symtab entries are 70 (same as vanilla gcc invocation), but more .dynsym entries.. -rdynamic没有额外的调试节,的.symtab条目是70(同香草GCC调用),但更多的.dynsym条目..

    Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 19 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
         0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND
         1: 0000000000000000   218 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (2)
         2: 00000000005008e8     0 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS _DYNAMIC
         3: 0000000000400750    57 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   12 __libc_csu_fini   
         4: 00000000004005e0     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   10 _init
         5: 0000000000400620     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   12 _start
         6: 00000000004006f0    86 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   12 __libc_csu_init   
         7: 0000000000500ab8     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS __bss_start
         8: 00000000004006de    16 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   12 main
         9: 0000000000500aa0     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT   23 data_start
        10: 00000000004007c8     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 _fini
        11: 00000000004006d8     6 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   12 foo
        12: 0000000000500ab8     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS _edata
        13: 0000000000500a80     0 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
        14: 0000000000500ac0     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS _end
        15: 00000000004007d8     4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   14 _IO_stdin_used
        16: 0000000000500aa0     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT   23 __data_start
        17: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
        18: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND __gmon_start__    

    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 70 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
         0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND 
         1: 0000000000400200     0 SECTION LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 
         2: 000000000040021c     0 SECTION LOCAL  DEFAULT    2 

Now these are the questions I have.. 现在这些是我的问题..

  1. In gdb you can do bt to get the bactrace. 在gdb中你可以做bt来获得bactrace。 If that works with just -g why do we need -rdynamic for backtrace_symbols to work ? 如果只使用-g为什么我们需要-rdynamic来使用backtrace_symbols?

  2. Comparing the additions to .symtab with -g & additions to .dynsym with -rdynamic they are not exactly the same.. Does either one provide better debugging info compared to the other ? 比较补充.symtab-g和补充, .dynsym-rdynamic他们是不完全一样的..一方是否提供更好的调试信息相比其他? FWIW, size of the output produced is like this: with -g > with -rdynamic > with neither option FWIW,产生的输出大小如下:使用-g> with -rdynamic>且没有选项

  3. What exactly is the usage of .dynsym ? .dynsym的用途究竟是什么? Is it all the symbols exported by this binary ? 是这个二进制文件导出的所有符号吗? In that case why is foo going into .dynsym because we are not compiling the code as a library. 在那种情况下,为什么foo会进入.dynsym,因为我们没有将代码编译为库。

  4. If I link my code using all static libraries then -rdynamic is not needed for backtrace_symbols to work ? 如果我使用所有静态库链接我的代码,那么backtrace_symbols不需要-rdynamic吗?

According to the docs: 根据文件:

This instructs the linker to add all symbols, not only used ones, to the dynamic symbol table. 这指示链接器将所有符号(不仅是已使用的符号)添加到动态符号表中。

Those are not debug symbols, they are dynamic linker symbols. 那些不是调试符号,它们是动态链接器符号。 Those are not removed by strip since it would (in most cases) break the executable - they are used by the runtime linker to do the final link stage of your executable. 这些不会被strip删除,因为它会(在大多数情况下)破坏可执行文件 - 运行时链接程序使用它们来执行可执行文件的最后一个链接阶段。

Example: 例:

$ cat t.c
void foo() {}
int main() { foo(); return 0; }

Compile and link without -rdynamic (and no optimizations, obviously) -rdynamic编译和链接(显然没有优化)

$ gcc -O0 -o t t.c
$ readelf -s t

Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 3 entries:
   Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
     0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND 
     1: 0000000000000000     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (2)
     2: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND __gmon_start__

Symbol table '.symtab' contains 50 entries:
   Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
     0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND 
     1: 0000000000400270     0 SECTION LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 
....
    27: 0000000000000000     0 FILE    LOCAL  DEFAULT  ABS t.c
    28: 0000000000600e14     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT   18 __init_array_end
    29: 0000000000600e40     0 OBJECT  LOCAL  DEFAULT   21 _DYNAMIC

So the executable has a .symtab with everything. 所以可执行文件有一个包含所有内容的.symtab But notice that .dynsym doesn't mention foo at all - it has the bare essentials in there. 但请注意, .dynsym根本没有提到foo - 它在那里有最基本的要点。 This is not enough information for backtrace_symbols to work. 这不足以让backtrace_symbols工作。 It relies on the information present in that section to match code addresses with function names. 它依赖于该部分中的信息来匹配代码地址和函数名称。

Now compile with -rdynamic : 现在用-rdynamic编译:

$ gcc -O0 -o t t.c -rdynamic
$ readelf -s t

Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 17 entries:
   Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
     0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND 
     1: 0000000000000000     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (2)
     2: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND __gmon_start__
     3: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
     4: 0000000000601018     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS _edata
     5: 0000000000601008     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT   24 __data_start
     6: 0000000000400734     6 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 foo
     7: 0000000000601028     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS _end
     8: 0000000000601008     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT   24 data_start
     9: 0000000000400838     4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   15 _IO_stdin_used
    10: 0000000000400750   136 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 __libc_csu_init
    11: 0000000000400650     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 _start
    12: 0000000000601018     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS __bss_start
    13: 000000000040073a    16 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 main
    14: 0000000000400618     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   11 _init
    15: 00000000004007e0     2 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 __libc_csu_fini
    16: 0000000000400828     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   14 _fini

Symbol table '.symtab' contains 50 entries:
   Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
     0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND 
     1: 0000000000400270     0 SECTION LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 
....
    27: 0000000000000000     0 FILE    LOCAL  DEFAULT  ABS t.c
    28: 0000000000600e14     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT   18 __init_array_end
    29: 0000000000600e40     0 OBJECT  LOCAL  DEFAULT   21 _DYNAMIC

Same thing for symbols in .symtab , but now foo has a symbol in the dynamic symbol section (and a bunch of other symbols appear there now too). 同样适用于.symtab中的符号,但现在foo在动态符号部分中有一个符号(现在也出现了一堆其他符号)。 This makes backtrace_symbols work - it now has enough information (in most cases) to map code addresses with function names. 这使得backtrace_symbols工作 - 它现在有足够的信息(在大多数情况下)用函数名映射代码地址。

Strip that: 除去:

$ strip --strip-all t
$ readelf -s t

Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 17 entries:
   Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
     0: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT  UND 
     1: 0000000000000000     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (2)
     2: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND __gmon_start__
     3: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
     4: 0000000000601018     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS _edata
     5: 0000000000601008     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT   24 __data_start
     6: 0000000000400734     6 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 foo
     7: 0000000000601028     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS _end
     8: 0000000000601008     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT   24 data_start
     9: 0000000000400838     4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   15 _IO_stdin_used
    10: 0000000000400750   136 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 __libc_csu_init
    11: 0000000000400650     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 _start
    12: 0000000000601018     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS __bss_start
    13: 000000000040073a    16 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 main
    14: 0000000000400618     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   11 _init
    15: 00000000004007e0     2 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 __libc_csu_fini
    16: 0000000000400828     0 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   14 _fini
$ ./t
$

Now .symtab is gone, but the dynamic symbol table is still there, and the executable runs. 现在.symtab已经消失,但动态符号表仍然存在,可执行文件运行。 So backtrace_symbols still works too. 所以backtrace_symbols仍然有效。

Strip the dynamic symbol table: 剥离动态符号表:

$ strip -R .dynsym t
$ ./t
./t: relocation error: ./t: symbol , version GLIBC_2.2.5 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

... and you get a broken executable. ......你得到一个破碎的可执行文件。

An interesting read for what .symtab and .dynsym are used for is here: Inside ELF Symbol Tables . 有关.symtab.dynsym用于什么的有趣读物如下: 内部ELF符号表 One of the things to note is that .symtab is not needed at runtime, so it is discarded by the loader. 需要注意的一点是,运行时不需要.symtab ,因此加载器会丢弃它。 That section does not remain in the process's memory. 该部分不会留在进程的内存中。 .dynsym , on the otherhand, is needed at runtime, so it is kept in the process image. .dynsym ,在otherhand, 需要在运行时间,所以它保持在处理图像英寸 So it is available for things like backtrace_symbols to gather information about the current process from within itself. 因此,它可用于backtrace_symbols东西,以从内部收集有关当前进程的信息。

So in short: 简而言之:

  • dynamic symbols are not stripped by strip since that would render the executable non-loadable 动态符号不会被strip剥离,因为这会使可执行文件不可加载
  • backtrace_symbols needs dynamic symbols to figure out what code belongs which function backtrace_symbols需要动态符号来确定哪些代码属于哪个函数
  • backtrace_symbols does not use debugging symbols backtrace_symbols不使用调试符号

Hence the behavior you noticed. 因此你注意到的行为。


For your specific questions: 针对您的具体问题:

  1. gdb is a debugger. gdb是一个调试器。 It uses debug information in the executable and libraries to display relevant information. 它使用可执行文件和库中的调试信息来显示相关信息。 It is much more complex than backtrace_symbols , and inspects the actual files on your drive in addition to the live process. 它比复杂得多 backtrace_symbols ,并检查除了直播过程中您的驱动器上的实际文件。 backtrace_symbols does not, it is entirely in-process - so it cannot access sections that are not loaded into the executable image. backtrace_symbols没有,它完全处于进程中 - 因此它无法访问未加载到可执行映像中的部分。 Debug sections are not loaded into the runtime image, so it can't use them. 调试部分未加载到运行时映像中,因此无法使用它们。
  2. .dynsym is not a debugging section. .dynsym不是调试部分。 It is a section used by the dynamic linker. 它是动态链接器使用的部分。 .symbtab isn't a debugging section either, but it can be used by debugger that have access to the executable (and library) files. .symbtab也不是调试部分,但可以由可以访问可执行(和库)文件的调试器使用。 -rdynamic does not generate debug sections, only that extended dynamic symbol table. -rdynamic 生成调试节,只生成扩展的动态符号表。 The executable growth from -rdynamic depends entirely on the number of symbols in that executable (and alignment/padding considerations). -rdynamic的可执行增长完全取决于该可执行文件中的符号数(以及对齐/填充注意事项)。 It should be considerably less than -g . 它应该远小于-g
  3. Except for statically linked binaries, executables need external dependencies resolved at load time. 除静态链接的二进制文件外,可执行文件需要在加载时解析外部依赖项。 Like linking printf and some application startup procedures from the C library. 就像从C库链接printf和一些应用程序启动过程一样。 These external symbols must be indicated somewhere in the executable: this is what .dynsym is used for, and this is why the exe has a .dynsym even if you don't specify -rdynamic . 这些外部符号必须在某个可执行文件中指示:这是.dynsym的用途,这就是为什么exe文件有一个.dynsym即使你不指定-rdynamic When you do specify it, the linker adds other symbols that are not necessary for the process to work, but can be used by things like backtrace_symbols . 当您指定它时,链接器会添加进程无需的其他符号,但可以由backtrace_symbols类的东西使用。
  4. backtrace_symbols will not resolve any function names if you statically link. 如果静态链接, backtrace_symbols将不会解析任何函数名称。 Even if you specify -rdynamic , the .dynsym section will not be emitted to the executable. 即使你指定-rdynamic ,该.dynsym部分将不发射到可执行文件。 No symbol tables gets loaded into the executable image, so backtrace_symbols cannot map code adresses to symbols. 没有符号表被加载到可执行映像中,因此backtrace_symbols无法将代码地址映射到符号。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM