简体   繁体   English

为此获得boost :: shared_ptr

[英]Getting a boost::shared_ptr for this

I am making extensive use of boost:shared_ptr in my code. 我在我的代码中广泛使用boost:shared_ptr In fact, most of the objects that are allocated on the heap are held by a shared_ptr . 实际上,堆上分配的大多数对象都由shared_ptr持有。 Unfortunately this means that I can't pass this into any function that takes a shared_ptr . 不幸的是,这意味着我无法通过this成需要的任何功能shared_ptr Consider this code: 考虑以下代码:

void bar(boost::shared_ptr<Foo> pFoo)
{
    ...
}

void Foo::someFunction()
{
    bar(this);
}

There are two problems here. 这里有两个问题。 First, this won't compile because the T* constructor for shared_ptr is explicit. 首先,这不会编译,因为shared_ptr的T *构造函数是显式的。 Second, if I force it to build with bar(boost::shared_ptr<Foo>(this)) I will have created a second shared pointer to my object that will eventually lead to a double-delete. 其次,如果我强制它用bar(boost::shared_ptr<Foo>(this))构建bar(boost::shared_ptr<Foo>(this))我将创建第二个指向我的对象的共享指针,最终将导致双删除。

This brings me to my question: Is there any standard pattern for getting a copy of the existing shared pointer you know exists from inside a method on one of those objects? 这让我想到了一个问题:是否有任何标准模式可以从其中一个对象的方法中获取您知道的现有共享指针的副本? Is using intrusive reference counting my only option here? 使用侵入式引用计数是我唯一的选择吗?

You can derive from enable_shared_from_this and then you can use "shared_from_this()" instead of "this" to spawn a shared pointer to your own self object. 您可以从enable_shared_from_this派生,然后您可以使用“ shared_from_this ()”而不是“this”来生成指向您自己的自身对象的共享指针。

Example in the link: 链接示例:

#include <boost/enable_shared_from_this.hpp>

class Y: public boost::enable_shared_from_this<Y>
{
public:

    shared_ptr<Y> f()
    {
        return shared_from_this();
    }
}

int main()
{
    shared_ptr<Y> p(new Y);
    shared_ptr<Y> q = p->f();
    assert(p == q);
    assert(!(p < q || q < p)); // p and q must share ownership
}

It's a good idea when spawning threads from a member function to boost::bind to a shared_from_this() instead of this. 从成员函数生成线程到boost :: bind到shared_from_this()而不是这个时,这是一个好主意。 It will ensure that the object is not released. 它将确保不释放对象。

Just use a raw pointer for your function parameter instead of the shared_ptr. 只需使用函数参数的原始指针而不是shared_ptr。 The purpose of a smart pointer is to control the lifetime of the object, but the object lifetime is already guaranteed by C++ scoping rules: it will exist for at least as long as the end of your function. 智能指针的目的是控制对象的生命周期,但C ++作用域规则已经保证了对象的生命周期:它至少与函数结束一样长。 That is, the calling code can't possibly delete the object before your function returns; 也就是说,调用代码不能在函数返回之前删除对象; thus the safety of a "dumb" pointer is guaranteed, as long as you don't try to delete the object inside your function. 因此,只要您不尝试删除函数内的对象,就可以保证“哑”指针的安全性。

The only time you need to pass a shared_ptr into a function is when you want to pass ownership of the object to the function, or want the function to make a copy of the pointer. 您需要将shared_ptr传递给函数的唯一时间是您希望将对象的所有权传递给函数,或者希望函数复制指针。

boost有这个用例的解决方案,请检查enable_shared_from_this

Are you really making more shared copies of pFoo inside bar? 你真的在酒吧内制作更多pFoo的共享副本吗? If you aren't doing anything crazy inside, just do this: 如果你内心没有做任何疯狂的事情,那就这样做:


void bar(Foo &foo)
{
    // ...
}

With C++11 shared_ptr and enable_shared_from_this is now in the standard library. 使用C ++ 11 shared_ptrenable_shared_from_this现在位于标准库中。 The latter is, as the name suggests, for this case exactly. 顾名思义,后者正好适用于这种情况。

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/enable_shared_from_this http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/enable_shared_from_this

Example bases on that in the links above: 示例基于以上链接中的示例:

struct Good: std::enable_shared_from_this<Good>{
    std::shared_ptr<Good> getptr() {
        return shared_from_this();
    }
};

use: 使用:

std::shared_ptr<Good> gp1(new Good);
std::shared_ptr<Good> gp2 = gp1->getptr();
std::cout << "gp2.use_count() = " << gp2.use_count() << '\n';

The function accepting a pointer wants to do one of two behaviors: 接受指针的函数想要执行以下两种行为之一:

  • Own the object being passed in, and delete it when it goes out of scope. 拥有传入的对象 ,并在超出范围时将其删除。 In this case, you can just accept X* and immediately wrap a scoped_ptr around that object (in the function body). 在这种情况下,您可以只接受X *并立即将scoped_ptr包装在该对象周围(在函数体中)。 This will work to accept "this" or, in general, any heap-allocated object. 这将接受“this”或者通常是任何堆分配的对象。
  • Share a pointer (don't own it) to the object being passed in. In this case you do not want to use a scoped_ptr at all, since you don't want to delete the object at the end of your function. 分享指针 (不拥有它)在传递的对象。在这种情况下,你希望使用scoped_ptr的所有,因为你不希望你的函数结束时删除对象。 In this case, what you theoretically want is a shared_ptr (I've seen it called a linked_ptr elsewhere). 在这种情况下,你理论上想要的是shared_ptr(我在其他地方看到它被称为linked_ptr)。 The boost library has a version of shared_ptr , and this is also recommended in Scott Meyers' Effective C++ book (item 18 in the 3rd edition). boost库有一个shared_ptr版本 ,这也是Scott Meyers的Effective C ++书籍(第3版第18项)中的推荐。

Edit: Oops I slightly misread the question, and I now see this answer is not exactly addressing the question. 编辑:哎呀我有点误读了这个问题,我现在看到这个答案并没有完全解决这个问题。 I'll leave it up anyway, in case this might be helpful for anyone working on similar code. 无论如何,我会把它留下来,以防这对任何从事类似代码工作的人都有帮助。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM