“SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED”和观点
[英]“SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED” and views
问题描述
如果在从多个表中选择复杂的视图中选择的存储过程上设置SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED ，那么这将在该视图中的所有表上放置READ UNCOMMITTED事务隔离级别吗？
1 个解决方案
解决方案1
6 已采纳 2012-02-01 17:08:58
会话将被设置为READ UNCOMMITTED - 这将适用于在会话中查询的所有表（无论是否通过视图），只要设置了此隔离级别即可。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要转载，请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.
相关问题
是否可以在数据库级别设置无锁或“事务隔离级别未提交读”？ - Is it possible to set no lock or TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED at database level?
如何将事务隔离级别设置为用户的默认未提交读 - How to set transaction isolation level as read uncommitted as default for users
WITH（NOLOCK）与SET事务隔离级别的读取未提交 - WITH (NOLOCK) vs SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
使用SQL Server的“未提交设置的事务隔离级别”的范围是什么？ - What is the scope of using SQL Server's “set transaction isolation level read uncommitted”
为什么“SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED”以不同的顺序返回行？ - Why “SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED” returns rows in different order?
未提交具有事务隔离级别的SQL Server死锁 - SQL Server Deadlock with Transaction Isolation Level Read Uncommitted
Sql Server隔离级别读取未提交是锁定 - Sql Server Isolation level Read Uncommitted is locking
SELECT语句 - 具有SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ NOUOCK的NOLOCK - SELECT Statement - NOLOCK with SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED
具有READ UNCOMMITTED隔离级别的查询是否可能导致对其访问的表进行锁定？ - Could an query with READ UNCOMMITTED isolation level cause locks on the tables it access?
事务隔离级别：不同地设置表隔离级别 - transaction isolation level: set table isolation level differently
相关标签