[英]Delete very slow
I need to delete only the first appear of a record. 我只需要删除一条记录的第一次出现。 This have a PK (
preld_item, IDENTITY
). 这有一个PK(
preld_item, IDENTITY
)。
This is the very slow DELETE.. 这是非常慢的DELETE ..
DELETE pd
FROM preliquidaciones_deta pd
WHERE pd.preld_item IN (SELECT MAX(p.preld_item)
FROM preliquidaciones_deta p
WHERE p.id_preliquidacion = '216'
GROUP BY p.id_sds_linea_equipo,
p.id_concepto
HAVING COUNT(p.id_sds_linea_equipo) > 1)
Thanks 谢谢
EDIT: 编辑:
id_preliquidacion
has a clustered index (pk) id_preliquidacion
具有聚集索引(pk) EDIT 2: @vulkanino i think in you answer and i modify the delete... 编辑2:@vulkanino我想在你的答案,我修改删除...
DECLARE @loPreldItem INT
DECLARE curItems CURSOR FOR (select max(p.preld_item)
from preliquidaciones_deta p
where p.id_preliquidacion = '216'
group by p.id_sds_linea_equipo, p.id_concepto
having count(p.id_sds_linea_equipo) > 1)
OPEN curItems
FETCH NEXT FROM curItems INTO @loPreldItem
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
DELETE FROM preliquidaciones_deta WHERE preld_item = @loPreldItem
FETCH NEXT FROM curItems INTO @loPreldItem
END
CLOSE curItems
DEALLOCATE curItems
This works best but continue slow 效果最佳,但持续缓慢
EDIT 3: The execution plan of the first delete 编辑3:第一次删除的执行计划
delete from preliquidaciones_deta where preld_item in ( select max(preld_item) from preliquidaciones_deta where id_preliquidacion = '216' group by id_sds_linea_equipo, id_concepto, preld_nse, preld_linea having count(id_preliquidacion) > 1)
|--Assert(WHERE:(CASE WHEN NOT [Expr1018] IS NULL THEN (0) ELSE CASE WHEN NOT [Expr1019] IS NULL THEN (1) ELSE NULL END END))
|--Nested Loops(Left Semi Join, OUTER REFERENCES:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_item]), DEFINE:([Expr1019] = [PROBE VALUE]))
|--Nested Loops(Left Semi Join, OUTER REFERENCES:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_item]), DEFINE:([Expr1018] = [PROBE VALUE]))
| |--Clustered Index Delete(OBJECT:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[PK_preliquidaciones_deta]), OBJECT:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[IX_id_sds]), OBJECT:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[IX_id_sds_linea_equipo]))
| | |--Top(ROWCOUNT est 0)
| | |--Sort(DISTINCT ORDER BY:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_item] ASC))
| | |--Nested Loops(Inner Join, OUTER REFERENCES:([Expr1007]) OPTIMIZED)
| | |--Filter(WHERE:([Expr1006]>(1)))
| | | |--Compute Scalar(DEFINE:([Expr1006]=CONVERT_IMPLICIT(int,[Expr1023],0)))
| | | |--Stream Aggregate(GROUP BY:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[id_sds_linea_equipo], [data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[id_concepto], [data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_nse], [data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_linea]) DEFINE:([Expr1023]=Count(*), [Expr1007]=MAX([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_item])))
| | | |--Sort(ORDER BY:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[id_sds_linea_equipo] ASC, [data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[id_concepto] ASC, [data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_nse] ASC, [data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_linea] ASC))
| | | |--Clustered Index Scan(OBJECT:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[PK_preliquidaciones_deta]), WHERE:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[id_preliquidacion]='216'))
| | |--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[PK_preliquidaciones_deta]), SEEK:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_item]=[Expr1007]) ORDERED FORWARD)
| |--Clustered Index Scan(OBJECT:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[liquidaciones_deta].[PK_liquidaciones_deta]), WHERE:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[liquidaciones_deta].[preld_item]=[data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_item]))
|--Table Scan(OBJECT:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[liquidaciones_diferidas]), WHERE:([data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[liquidaciones_diferidas].[preld_item]=[data_dealernet_lucom].[dbo].[preliquidaciones_deta].[preld_item]))
You could try this alternative (as you state there won't be more than 2 rows per id_sds_linea_equipo, id_concepto
this has the same semantics as your original query) 您可以尝试这种选择(因为您声明每个
id_sds_linea_equipo, id_concepto
有2行id_sds_linea_equipo, id_concepto
的语义与原始查询的语义相同)
WITH T
AS (SELECT *,
RN = ROW_NUMBER() OVER
(PARTITION BY id_sds_linea_equipo, id_concepto
ORDER BY preld_item)
FROM preliquidaciones_deta
WHERE id_preliquidacion = '216')
DELETE FROM T
WHERE RN > 1
Change IN
with =
since the subquery returns only on row. 用
=
更改IN
,因为子查询仅在行上返回。 (to begin with). (首先)。
不知道它是否适用于您的情况(由于HAVING子句),但是ORDER BY p.preld_item DESC LIMIT 1
可能比最大聚合快得多。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.