[英]How to check equality of iterator?
In my llvm
code, I try to check if the iterator InsertPos is pointing to the last instruction of a basic block, with the following code. 在我的
llvm
代码中,我尝试使用以下代码检查迭代器InsertPos是否指向基本块的最后一条指令。
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPos = BB->begin();
LLVMContext &Context = BB->getContext();
while ( !( isa<CallInst>(InsertPos) ||
( InsertPos == BB->getTerminator() ) ) ) // <-- Error here
++InsertPos;
However, clang
gives me the following error. 但是,
clang
给我以下错误。
Basic2.cpp:82:54: error: use of overloaded operator '==' is ambiguous (with operand types 'BasicBlock::iterator' (aka 'ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>')
and 'llvm::TerminatorInst *')
while ( !( isa<CallInst>(InsertPos) || ( InsertPos == BB->getTerminator() ) ) )
~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/hmushtaq/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:204:8: note: candidate function
bool operator==(const ilist_iterator &RHS) const {
^
Basic2.cpp:82:54: note: built-in candidate operator==(class llvm::Instruction *, class llvm::Instruction *)
while ( !( isa<CallInst>(InsertPos) || ( InsertPos == BB->getTerminator() ) ) )
^
Basic2.cpp:82:54: note: built-in candidate operator==(restrict class llvm::Instruction *, restrict class llvm::Instruction *)
Basic2.cpp:82:54: note: built-in candidate operator==(const restrict class llvm::Instruction *, const restrict class llvm::Instruction *)
Basic2.cpp:82:54: note: built-in candidate operator==(volatile class llvm::Instruction *, volatile class llvm::Instruction *)
Basic2.cpp:82:54: note: built-in candidate operator==(const volatile class llvm::Instruction *, const volatile class llvm::Instruction *)
Basic2.cpp:82:54: note: built-in candidate operator==(volatile restrict class llvm::Instruction *, volatile restrict class llvm::Instruction *)
Basic2.cpp:82:54: note: built-in candidate operator==(const class llvm::Instruction *, const class llvm::Instruction *)
Basic2.cpp:82:54: note: built-in candidate operator==(const volatile restrict class llvm::Instruction *, const volatile restrict class llvm::Instruction *)
What is the right way of doing this? 正确的做法是什么?
BB->getTerminator()
returns a pointer ( TerminatorInst *
), while InsertPos
is an iterator ( BasicBlock::iterator
). BB->getTerminator()
返回一个指针( TerminatorInst *
),而InsertPos
是一个迭代器( BasicBlock::iterator
)。 The types do no match. 类型不匹配。
Maybe you could try 也许你可以尝试
&*InsertPos == BB->getTerminator()
You could also check if an Instruction is a terminator with the isTerminator()
method . 您还可以使用
isTerminator()
方法检查指令是否为终止符。
InsertPos->isTerminator()
I solved it like this. 我这样解决了。
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPos = BB->begin();
BasicBlock::iterator TermPos = BB->getTerminator(); // <-- Added this variable
while ( !( isa<CallInst>(InsertPos) || ( InsertPos == TermPos ) ) )
++InsertPos;
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.