简体   繁体   English

使用带通配符的泛型的合适设计

[英]Suitable design using Generics with Wildcard

I am trying to determine if generics would be able to help me with designing a better and scalable solution. 我试图确定泛型是否能够帮助我设计更好的可扩展解决方案。 In my application, there is a model class which is responsible for loading data from data sources and I use a ModelProxy class to expose some of the methods in the Model class. 在我的应用程序中,有一个Model类负责从数据源中加载数据,我使用ModelProxy类来公开Model类中的某些方法。

public interface ModelProxy {
     public int getOrderCount();
     public int getCustomerCount();
}

public abstract class AbstractModel {
     public abstract ModelProxy loadData(Configuration configuration);
}

public class ConcreteModel extends AbstractModel {
    public ModelProxy loadData(Configuration configuration) {
         loadInternal();
         return new ConcereteModelProxy(this);
    }
}

Everything looks good so far, but I am looking to see if generics (with wildcards) can help me design a better solution that would allow to be extend the ModelProxy interface or the Configuration class. 到目前为止,一切看起来都不错,但我希望了解泛型(带通配符)是否可以帮助我设计更好的解决方案,以允许扩展ModelProxy接口或Configuration类。 For example, in another Concrete Model class I woukd like to use a ExtendedConfiguration class and ExtendedModelProxy. 例如,在另一个具体模型类中,我想使用ExtendedConfiguration类和ExtendedModelProxy。

public ExtendedModelProxy extends ModelProxy {
   // Additional methods
   public int getTotalCount();
}

public class ConcereteModel2 extends AbstractModel {
   public ExtendedModelProxy loadDate(ExtendedConfiguration configuration) {
      return new ConcreteExtendedModelProxy(this);
   }
}

Will Java Generics help me to achieve something like above? Java泛型会帮助我实现上述目标吗? Or Maybe my design is flawed that I need to re-design it. 也许我的设计存在缺陷,需要重新设计。 Any suggestions would be very helpful. 任何建议将非常有帮助。

Thanks, 谢谢,

Example Client Code: 客户端代码示例:

public abstract class Service {
   public ModelProxy load(Configuration configuration) {
       return getModel().loadData(configuration);
   }

   protected abstract AbstractModel getModel();
}

public class ServiceImpl extends Service {
   protected AbstractModel getModel() {
      return new ConcreteModel();
   }

   public static void main() {
      Service service = new ServiceImpl();
      ModelProxy proxy = service.load(configuration);
      System.out.println(proxy.getOrderCount());
   }
}

public class ExtendedServiceImpl extends Service {
   protected AbstractModel getModel() {
      return new ConcreteModel2();
   }

   public static void main() {
      Service service = new ExtendedServiceImpl();
      ExtendedModelProxy proxy = (ExtendedModelProxy) service.load(configuration);
      System.out.println(proxy.getTotalCount());
   }
}

I hope to not have confused with too much. 我希望不要混淆太多。 In the ExtendedServiceImpl, you can see I need to cast ModelProxy to ExtendedModelProxy to be able to access the method getTotalCount. 在ExtendedServiceImpl中,您可以看到我需要将ModelProxy强制转换为ExtendedModelProxy才能访问方法getTotalCount。 My thinking was maybe I can use generics to avoid the casts. 我的想法是,也许我可以使用泛型来避免强制类型转换。 Something like 就像是

public abstract <M extends ModelProxy, C extends Configuration> M loadData(C configuration);

Maybe I am overcomplicating things and really my current design is all I need. 也许我使事情变得过于复杂,而实际上我目前所需要的设计才是我所需要的。 Not sure... 不确定...

How about this kind of thing 这样的事情怎么样

package jj;

import java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler;
import java.lang.reflect.Proxy;
import java.util.*;

interface Configuration {
}

interface Model {
}

interface OrderModel extends Model {
    public int getOrderCount();
    public int getCustomerCount();
}

interface CustomerModel extends Model {
    public int getName();
    public int getAddress();
}

abstract class AbstractModel<M extends Model> {
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public M loadData(Configuration configuration) {
        // connect to stuff
        Object connection = null;
        loadInternal(configuration, connection);
        // do some other stuff
        return (M) Proxy.newProxyInstance(null, new Class<?>[]{getModelClass()}, null);
    }

    protected abstract void loadInternal(Configuration configuration,
            Object connection);

    protected abstract InvocationHandler getInvocationHandler(Object connection);
    protected abstract Class<M> getModelClass();
}

class ConcreteOrderModel extends AbstractModel<OrderModel> {
    public void loadInternal(Configuration configuration,
            Object connection) {
    }

    protected InvocationHandler getInvocationHandler(Object connection) {
        return null;
    }

    protected Class<OrderModel> getModelClass() {
        return OrderModel.class;
    }
}

class ConcreteCustomerModel extends AbstractModel<CustomerModel> {
    public void loadInternal(Configuration configuration,
            Object connection) {
    }

    protected InvocationHandler getInvocationHandler(Object connection) {
        return null;
    }

    protected Class<CustomerModel> getModelClass() {
        return CustomerModel.class;
    }
}

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM