简体   繁体   English

对于新式类,super()引发“TypeError:必须是type,而不是classobj”

[英]super() raises “TypeError: must be type, not classobj” for new-style class

The following use of super() raises a TypeError: why? 以下使用super()会引发TypeError:为什么?

>>> from  HTMLParser import HTMLParser
>>> class TextParser(HTMLParser):
...     def __init__(self):
...         super(TextParser, self).__init__()
...         self.all_data = []
...         
>>> TextParser()
(...)
TypeError: must be type, not classobj

There is a similar question on StackOverflow: Python super() raises TypeError , where the error is explained by the fact that the user class is not a new-style class. StackOverflow上有一个类似的问题: Python super()引发TypeError ,其中错误的解释是用户类不是新式类。 However, the class above is a new-style class, as it inherits from object : 但是,上面的类是一个新式类,因为它继承自object

>>> isinstance(HTMLParser(), object)
True

What am I missing? 我错过了什么? How can I use super() , here? 我怎么能在这里使用super()

Using HTMLParser.__init__(self) instead of super(TextParser, self).__init__() would work, but I would like to understand the TypeError. 使用HTMLParser.__init__(self)而不是super(TextParser, self).__init__()可以工作,但我想了解TypeError。

PS: Joachim pointed out that being a new-style-class instance is not equivalent to being an object . PS:Joachim指出,作为一个新式的实例并不等同于成为一个object I read the opposite many times, hence my confusion (example of new-style class instance test based on object instance test: https://stackoverflow.com/revisions/2655651/3 ). 我多次反复阅读,因此我的困惑(基于object实例测试的新式类实例测试示例: https//stackoverflow.com/revisions/2655651/3 )。

Alright, it's the usual " super() cannot be used with an old-style class". 好吧,这是通常的“ super()不能用于旧式的”。

However, the important point is that the correct test for "is this a new-style instance (ie object)?" 然而,重要的一点是正确的测试 “这是一个新风格的实例 (即对象)?” is

>>> class OldStyle: pass
>>> instance = OldStyle()
>>> issubclass(instance.__class__, object)
False

and not (as in the question): 而不是(如在问题中):

>>> isinstance(instance, object)
True

For classes , the correct "is this a new-style class" test is: 对于 ,正确的“这是一个新式的类”测试是:

>>> issubclass(OldStyle, object)  # OldStyle is not a new-style class
False
>>> issubclass(int, object)  # int is a new-style class
True

The crucial point is that with old-style classes, the class of an instance and its type are distinct. 关键点在于,对于旧式类,实例的及其类型是不同的。 Here, OldStyle().__class__ is OldStyle , which does not inherit from object , while type(OldStyle()) is the instance type, which does inherit from object . 这里, OldStyle().__class__OldStyle ,其不从继承object ,而type(OldStyle())instance类型, 从继承object Basically, an old-style class just creates objects of type instance (whereas a new-style class creates objects whose type is the class itself). 基本上,旧式类只创建类型instance对象(而新式类创建类型为类本身的对象)。 This is probably why the instance OldStyle() is an object : its type() inherits from object (the fact that its class does not inherit from object does not count: old-style classes merely construct new objects of type instance ). 这大概就是为什么实例OldStyle()是一个object :它的type()从继承object (事实上,它的类没有从继承object :老式类只是构建类型的新对象不计算instance )。 Partial reference: https://stackoverflow.com/a/9699961/42973 . 部分参考: https//stackoverflow.com/a/9699961/42973

PS: The difference between a new-style class and an old-style one can also be seen with: PS:新风格类和旧风格类之间的区别也可以通过以下方式看出:

>>> type(OldStyle)  # OldStyle creates objects but is not itself a type
classobj
>>> isinstance(OldStyle, type)
False
>>> type(int)  # A new-style class is a type
type

(old-style classes are not types, so they cannot be the type of their instances). (旧式类不是类型,因此它们不能是它们实例的类型)。

super() can be used only in the new-style classes, which means the root class needs to inherit from the 'object' class. super()只能在new-style类中使用,这意味着root类需要从'object'类继承。

For example, the top class need to be like this: 例如,顶级类需要像这样:

class SomeClass(object):
    def __init__(self):
        ....

not

class SomeClass():
    def __init__(self):
        ....

So, the solution is that call the parent's init method directly, like this way: 所以,解决方案是直接调用父的init方法,就像这样:

class TextParser(HTMLParser):
    def __init__(self):
        HTMLParser.__init__(self)
        self.all_data = []

You can also use class TextParser(HTMLParser, object): . 您还可以使用class TextParser(HTMLParser, object): This makes TextParser a new-style class, and super() can be used. 这使得TextParser成为一种新式的类,并且可以使用super()

The problem is that super needs an object as an ancestor: 问题是super需要一个object作为祖先:

>>> class oldstyle:
...     def __init__(self): self.os = True

>>> class myclass(oldstyle):
...     def __init__(self): super(myclass, self).__init__()

>>> myclass()
TypeError: must be type, not classobj

On closer examination one finds: 仔细研究后发现:

>>> type(myclass)
classobj

But: 但:

>>> class newstyle(object): pass

>>> type(newstyle)
type    

So the solution to your problem would be to inherit from object as well as from HTMLParser. 因此,您的问题的解决方案是从对象以及HTMLParser继承。 But make sure object comes last in the classes MRO: 但要确保对象在MRO类中排在最后:

>>> class myclass(oldstyle, object):
...     def __init__(self): super(myclass, self).__init__()

>>> myclass().os
True

If you look at the inheritance tree (in version 2.6), HTMLParser inherits from SGMLParser which inherits from ParserBase which doesn't inherits from object . 如果查看继承树(在2.6版本中), HTMLParser继承自从ParserBase继承的SGMLParser ,它object继承。 Ie HTMLParser is an old-style class. 即HTMLParser是一个旧式的类。

About your checking with isinstance , I did a quick test in ipython: 关于你的isinstance ,我在ipython中做了一个快速测试:

In [1]: class A:
   ...:     pass
   ...: 

In [2]: isinstance(A, object)
Out[2]: True

Even if a class is old-style class, it's still an instance of object . 即使一个类是旧式类,它仍然是一个object的实例。

the correct way to do will be as following in the old-style classes which doesn't inherit from 'object' 正确的方法是在旧式类中继承“对象”

class A:
    def foo(self):
        return "Hi there"

class B(A):
    def foo(self, name):
        return A.foo(self) + name

FWIW and though I'm no Python guru I got by with this FWIW虽然我不是Python大师,但我还是接受了这个

>>> class TextParser(HTMLParser):
...    def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
...        if tag == "b":
...            self.all_data.append("bold")
...        else:
...            self.all_data.append("other")
...     
...         
>>> p = TextParser()
>>> p.all_data = []
>>> p.feed(text)
>>> print p.all_data
(...)

Just got me the parse results back as needed. 刚刚根据需要解析了解析结果。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM