简体繁体 English

使用Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate进行模拟

[英]Mocks with Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate

原文 2012-04-20 14:40:55 6 4 c#/ unit-testing/ tdd/ moq/ rhino-mocks

Should I keep using Mocks with Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate?, I mean, all the information I'm gathering about mocks is kinda old, from like 2 or 3 years ago, more specific, I'm gathering info about the next frameworks Rhino Mocks and Moq . 我应该继续使用Mocks和Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate吗？我的意思是，我收集的关于模拟的所有信息都有点陈旧，就像2或3年前一样，更具体，我正在收集有关下一个框架Rhino Mocks的信息和Moq 。

But then, I don't know if I'm looking for something old or deprecated or that it's not used nowdays... I'm making a new project and I want to used the last frameworks to implement the TDD in the best way possible, and since we recently acquired the Ultimate version of VS2010, which has a lot info and utilities about testing, I wanna do the things the way they should be done. 但是，我不知道我是在寻找旧的还是已经弃用的东西，或者现在没有使用它......我正在制作一个新项目，我想用最后的框架以最好的方式实现TDD可能，因为我们最近购买了VS2010的终极版本，它有很多关于测试的信息和实用程序，我想按照他们应该做的方式做事情。

Oh, I almost forgot, I have to use VB, and most of the info about these frameworks are in C#, I don't know if that could be relevant... 哦，我差点忘了，我必须使用VB，关于这些框架的大部分信息都在C＃中，我不知道这是否相关......

Thanks in advice! 谢谢你的建议！

EDIT 编辑

Moq along with AutoFixture did the job Moq和AutoFixture完成了这项工作

4 个解决方案

Moq is my mocking framework of choice, but that's just a personal preference. Moq是我嘲弄的选择框架，但这只是个人偏好。 And it doesn't really matter that the samples are typically written in C#, provided you can read C#, since you can use all the same methods, but with a slightly different syntax. 如果您可以阅读C＃，那么样本通常用C＃编写并不重要，因为您可以使用所有相同的方法，但语法略有不同。

You really can't go wrong with either Moq or RhinoMocks. Moq或RhinoMocks你真的不会出错。

Rhino and Moq will both give you what you need. Rhino和Moq都会为您提供所需的产品。 If money is not an issue I would also suggest Typemock . 如果钱不是问题，我也建议使用Typemock 。

Rhino, Moq and (my favorite) FakeItEasy are nice mocking/faking frameworks. Rhino，Moq和（我最喜欢的）FakeItEasy是很好的模拟/伪造框架。

It shouldn't matter which language you're testing in (VB or C#), but to be safe check the docs for all these frameworks. 您正在测试哪种语言（VB或C＃）无关紧要，但要安全检查所有这些框架的文档。 I know FakeItEasy supports VB.NET. 我知道FakeItEasy支持VB.NET。 You should also look into Roy Osherove's book about unit testing in .NET, highly recommended. 您还应该深入了解Roy Osherove关于.NET中单元测试的书。

I tend to look at the activity on the web site where the source is hosted and try to work out whether a project is being actively maintained. 我倾向于查看托管源的网站上的活动，并尝试确定是否正在积极维护项目。 If there is good developer velocity then that's usually a sign of a well-supported project. 如果有良好的开发人员速度，那通常是一个良好支持的项目的标志。 All of the mocking frameworks mentioned here are fairly good bets, my personal favourite is Moq and I like to use it with MSpec (Machine.Specifications), but of course each developer or team needs to make those choices for themselves. 这里提到的所有模拟框架都是相当不错的投注，我个人最喜欢的是Moq，我喜欢将它与MSpec（Machine.Specifications）一起使用，但当然每个开发人员或团队都需要为自己做出这些选择。

If you haven't already, get the NuGet plugin for Visual Studio and use that to install all your frameworks. 如果您还没有，请获取Visual Studio的NuGet插件并使用它来安装所有框架。 If you are using a CI build and don't want to check these items into your version control, there is a ' no-commit workflow ' for NuGet that uses the NuGetPowerTools package. 如果您正在使用CI构建并且不想将这些项目检查到您的版本控制中，那么使用NuGetPowerTools包的NuGet有一个“ 无提交工作流程 ”。

Regarding the examples being in C#, you can use the Telerik Code Converter to easily translate them into VB. 关于C＃中的示例，您可以使用Telerik Code Converter轻松将它们转换为VB。