简体   繁体   English

C ++宏中的模板?

[英]Template in a Macros in C++?

Is it possible to do so 是否可以这样做

# define abc<T1> __abc<T1, T2>

template<typename T2> void somefun() {
    ... 
    abc<int>(...);
    abc<double>(...);
    ...
}

Just to not write it every time i call abc 我每次打电话给abc都不写

In C++11 you can do: 在C ++ 11中,您可以:

template<typename T2> void somefun() {
    template <typename T>
    using abc = __abc<T, T2>;
}

Without that you can use a macro but you'd need to do: 没有它你可以使用宏,但你需要做:

#define abc(T1) __abc<T1, T2>

//usage:

abc(Type) instance;

but since that doesn't look very natural I'd avoid it personally. 但由于这看起来不太自然,我会亲自避免它。

If you want to avoid the macro pre-C++11 you can do something like: 如果你想避免宏前C ++ 11,你可以做类似的事情:

template <typename T2>
struct type {
  template <typename T1>
  struct lookup {
    typedef __abc<T1,T2> type;
  };
};

template <typename T2> void somefun() {
  typedef type<T2> abc;
  typename abc::template lookup<int>::type();
}

But in all honesty that's less readable than even the macro case 但诚实地说,即使是宏观案例也不那么可读

(Note: __abc is reserved) (注意:保留__abc

Yes, but you need to use round parentheses. 是的,但你需要使用圆括号。

# define abc(T1) __abc<T1, T2>

template<typename T2> void somefun() {
    ... 
    abc(int)(...);
    abc(double)(...);
}

Edit: My recommendation is not using macros for this kind of abbreviation at all. 编辑:我建议根本不使用这种缩写的宏。 Use awoodlands solution or maybe a default template parameter. 使用awoodlands解决方案或可能是默认模板参数。 And thou shall not use reserved names. 你不应该使用保留的名字。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM