[英]Is interface required on a class extending an abstract class already implementing the interface?
Assume there is a code as such: 假设有一个代码:
package com.ps.Sample;
public interface Sample
{
public void Method1();
}
public abstract class AbstractSample implements Sample
{
public void Method1()
{
System.out.println("Hello World");
}
}
public class MySample extends AbstractSample
{
}
public class TestSample
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
Sample my = new MySample();
my.Method1();
}
}
My question is: Is there any benefit to declaring the concrete class as 我的问题是:宣布具体课程是否有任何好处
public class MySample extends AbstractSample implements Sample
instead of 代替
public class MySample extends AbstractSample
No, there is not. 不,那里没有。 It's redundant. 这是多余的。 AbstractSample is a Sample, and MySample is a AbstractSample. AbstractSample 是一个 Sample,MySample 是一个 AbstractSample。 So MySample is a Sample. 所以MySample 是一个样本。
The javadoc displays all the implemented interfaces anyway, whether you add the implements Sample
or not. 无论您是否添加implements Sample
,javadoc都会显示所有已实现的接口。
一个好处是,如果将AbstractSample更改为不实现Sample,则第一个声明仍然允许您将MySample的实例传递给期望Sample的方法。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.