通过第三方工具测试我的asp.net mvc 2应用程序时，为什么验证工作无法正常进行？

Question

I am working with an ASP.NET MVC 2 application that performs basic CRUD operations against a DB2 table. When testing my application by simply loading it in IE, if I put characters in a numbers field or numbers in a date field or some other form of data that is incompatible with the datatype in my View Model, MVC performs correct error processing on its end and the view is returned with the appropriate Model State Error messages as displayed by the Html.ValidationSummary() mvc helper.

However, when I run tests with programs such as IBM AppScan or forge POST requests with Fiddler2, the application flips out.

I am performing what I believe to be the same sort of test in 2 different ways and am getting various results.

I am also employing the use of MVC'S AntiForgeryToken system, but that doesn't do much good because these programs just scan the request data, find the token, and make sure it's included with their forged POST.

Also note that I am using DataAnnotations on the server side to handle several of these validations and instead of getting the error the annotations ought to return, the page is redirected to the applications error page for uncaught exceptions.

I'm actually quite baffled by all this. What am I missing?

Answer 1

LukLed's comment had me do a sanity check on things and he's absolutely right. I'm doing it wrong. When I forged request body details in Fiddler, I did it in a way where I knew the data would be incorrect, but the data would also fall under the correct validations, so the error would be caught. My testing such as submitting characters for a number only field (I had thought this is the sort of thing that bombed the app when AppScan tested it) gave the correct results.

However, LukLed's comment had me really look at the POST data AppScan sent. In every application error, the field was a string on the viewmodel. I allowed the data to pass without strenuous checks on length and a "String data right truncation." SQL ERROR ensued. This also brought to light that I need to do better sanitizing of the data because some of the values AppScan submitted were like:

'../../../../../../../../../../../../bin/id|' for an account number field and

Foobar%0d%0aAppScanHeader:%20AppScanValue%2f1%2e2%2d3%0d%0aSecondAppScanHeader:%20whatever' for a description field.

Special characters such as these ought not be allowed in the form submission.