简体繁体 English

在带有.net包装器版本的quickfix还是quickfix / n版本之间进行选择？

[英]Choosing between the quickfix with .net wrapper version or quickfix/n version?

原文 2012-06-12 23:24:47 1 1 c#/ quickfix

I am trying to decide which version to use and would appreciate any feedback on this topic. 我正在尝试决定使用哪个版本，并且希望就此主题提供任何反馈。 It would be good to get some pro's and con's. 得到一些赞成和反对意见将是一件好事。

The research I have done so far would be that the quickfix/n version would run faster and is maybe easier to implement but there does seem to be some functionality that the quickfix/n version does not support ie Database support for storing messages. 到目前为止，我所做的研究是quickfix / n版本运行速度更快，并且可能更容易实现，但是似乎确实存在一些quickfix / n版本不支持的功能，即数据库支持存储消息。

1 个解决方案

at the moment we are using in a production environment a service based on QuickFix with .net wrapper. 目前，我们正在生产环境中使用基于QuickFix和.net包装器的服务。 We haven't any problem about performances and it's very easy to implement. 我们在性能上没有任何问题，并且很容易实现。 And a great functionality is the possibility to store messages and logs in a database (we use sqlserver). 强大的功能是可以将消息和日志存储在数据库中（我们使用sqlserver）。

I've tested the /n version but at the moment I'm waiting for the switch. 我已经测试过/ n版本，但此刻我正在等待切换。 In my opinion the database support in a great feature. 我认为数据库支持功能非常强大。

So start implementing the .net wrapper solution! 因此，开始实施.net包装器解决方案！

Best regards, stex 最好的问候，stex

EDITED EDITED

If you need some surces for sample code, try also: 如果您需要一些示例代码，请尝试：

http://old.nabble.com/QuickFIX-f1039.html http://old.nabble.com/QuickFIX-f1039.html

and the official FIX forum: 和官方的FIX论坛：

http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/ http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/