简体   繁体   English

如何编写脚本以使用boost :: unit_test执行自动测试?

[英]How to write a script to perform automatic test with boost::unit_test?

I am a newbie of automatic unit test in C++. 我是C ++中自动单元测试的新手。 I have followed the instruction of boost::unit_test and finished a test scheme by calling function unit_test_main in boost::unit_test. 我遵循了boost :: unit_test的指令,并通过在boost :: unit_test中调用function unit_test_main完成了一个测试方案。 It is no problem for me to run the test program. 对我来说,运行测试程序没有问题。 However, I have problems with pass the arguments to the test function. 但是,我在将参数传递给测试函数时遇到问题。 Maybe, the following codes can illustrate my problem much better: 也许,以下代码可以更好地说明我的问题:

#ifndef MAIN_CPP_
#define MAIN_CPP_



#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include <assert.h>

#include <boost/program_options.hpp>
#include <boost/test/test_tools.hpp>
#include <boost/test/execution_monitor.hpp>
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>




using namespace boost::program_options;
using namespace std;
using namespace boost;
using namespace boost::unit_test;




/**
* the global test suite
*/

boost::unit_test::test_suite* get_feelfree_test_suite();
boost::unit_test::test_suite* main_global_test_suite;

/**
* name of the test suite
*/
std::string current_global_test_suite_name;

#ifdef BOOST_TEST_ALTERNATIVE_INIT_API

bool  run_global_test_suite () {
    boost::unit_test::test_suite& masterTestSuite = framework::master_test_suite();

    if(masterTestSuite.size() != 0) {
        test_unit_id formerTestSuite = masterTestSuite.get(current_global_test_suite_name);
        masterTestSuite.remove(formerTestSuite);

    }
    masterTestSuite.add(main_global_test_suite);
    current_global_test_suite_name = main_global_test_suite->p_name.get();

    return true;
}
#else
    test_suite* run_global_test_suite(int, char* []) {
    return main_global_test_suite;
}
#endif

/**
* Obtain test program options
*/
int obtain_options(char **optionLine, int argc, char** argv); 





/**
* This function is used to run the test program, and the procedure is really standard.
*/
int main( int argc, char* argv[] )
{
    try 
    {
        /**
        * Step 1. obtain options
        */
        char* optionLine[1024];
        int len ;
        len = obtain_options(optionLine, argc, argv);
        /**
        * Step 2. perform unit test based on user's options
        */
        int test_status=0; 
        main_global_test_suite =   get_feelfree_test_suite();
        test_status = unit_test_main(run_global_test_suite, len, optionLine);
        return test_status;
    } 
    catch(std::exception& e)
    {
        std::cout << e.what() << std::endl;
        return 1;
    }   
    catch (const std::string& s) 
    {
        std::cout << s << std::endl;
        return 1;
    }
    catch (...)
    {
        return 1;
    }


}
/** @} */ 


int obtain_options(char **optionLine, int argc,  char* argv[])
{
    // 1. All the options for testing the program
        options_description desc("Allowed options");
        desc.add_options()("help", "produce help message")
        ("detect_memory_leaks", value<bool>()->default_value(false), "test configuration option (option of boost framework)");
        // 2. Perform parsing 
        variables_map vm;
        store(parse_command_line(argc, argv, desc), vm);
        notify(vm);
        // 3. Illustrate the input 
        std::vector<const char*> options;
        std::string testSuiteToRun;
        if(vm.count("test_suite")){  
            testSuiteToRun = vm["test_suite"].as<string>(); 
        }
        else {
            testSuiteToRun = "main";
        }   

        options.push_back(argv[0]);
        if(vm.count("detect_memory_leaks")) {  
            bool detect = vm["detect_memory_leaks"].as<bool>();
            if(detect) {
                options.push_back("--detect_memory_leaks=1");
            }
            else {
            options.push_back("--detect_memory_leaks=0");
            }
        }
        else {
            options.push_back("--detect_memory_leaks=0");
        }

        // 4. Obtain all the parameters in the format of char** 

        assert(options.size() < 1024);
        std::copy(options.begin(), options.end(), const_cast<const char**>(optionLine));

        return options.size();

}

void Testsub(const std::string &name)
{
    cout<<"File_name: "<<name<<endl;
}
void Testabc( )
{
    std::vector<std::string > name_array;
    name_array.push_back("name 1");
    name_array.push_back("name 2");
    for(int i=0; i<name_array.size(); i++)
        Testsub(name_array[i]);
}


boost::unit_test::test_suite* get_feelfree_test_suite()
{
    test_suite* ts = BOOST_TEST_SUITE( "unit_geometric" );
    ts->add( BOOST_TEST_CASE(&Testabc) ); 
    return ts;
}


#endif

As you can see, in this test framework, the main function I want to test is Testsub , which relies on the input argument const std::string &name . 如您所见,在此测试框架中,我要测试的主要功能是Testsub ,它依赖于输入参数const std :: string&name However, I can not pass any arguments via the test suite function get_feelfree_test_suite . 但是,我无法通过测试套件函数get_feelfree_test_suite传递任何参数。 Therefore, in this test program, I wrote another test function Testabc , where all the possible file test lists are given and passed to Testsub . 因此,在此测试程序中,我编写了另一个测试函数Testabc ,其中给出了所有可能的文件测试列表,并将其传递给Testsub This is definitely not the best solution. 这绝对不是最佳解决方案。 I am wondering whether there are other solutions. 我想知道是否还有其他解决方案。 Several solutions are in my mind, but I do not know whether they are good solutions: 我想到了几种解决方案,但我不知道它们是否是好的解决方案:

  • Solution 1: try to figure out a way to pass arguments to get_feelfree_test_suite from the main function ( int main( int argc, char* argv[] ). After that, write a script to run the program several times. In windows, one possible script is .bat script. For this solution, I do not know how to implement it. 解决方案1:尝试找出从主函数( int main( int argc, char* argv[] )将参数传递给get_feelfree_test_suite的方法。此后,编写脚本多次运行该程序。在Windows中,一种可能脚本是.bat脚本,对于这种解决方案,我不知道如何实现。
  • Solution 2: write a list file, where all the possible input file test names are given, and then read the list file in the program. 解决方案2:编写一个列表文件,在其中给出所有可能的输入文件测试名称,然后在程序中读取该列表文件。 This is much easier to implement. 这很容易实现。

I also hear that Python can be very easily incorporated in the test framework, but I have no idea about that. 我还听说Python可以很容易地集成到测试框架中,但是我对此一无所知。 Anyway, I am open to all the possible solutions, and thanks! 无论如何,我愿意接受所有可能的解决方案,谢谢!

Do you really need to have the different "names" in a separate file? 您是否真的需要在单独的文件中使用不同的“名称”? It would probably simpler to put them into your test suite. 将它们放入测试套件可能会更简单。 One BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE for every name. 每个名称一个BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE。 Or an array of names, which you can iterate over in the test case. 或一个名称数组,您可以在测试用例中对其进行迭代。

Since I do not really understand the purpose of all the code, I post a minimal sample that does the work (calling Testsub several times) by parsing elements like -F file1 -F file2 from the command line. 由于我并不是很了解所有代码的用途,因此我发布了一个最小的示例,该示例通过Testsub解析-F file1 -F file2类的元素来完成工作(多次调用Testsub )。 It does use the BOOST_PARAM_TEST_CASE macro of boost::unittest : 它确实使用boost::unittestBOOST_PARAM_TEST_CASE宏:

#include <boost/test/parameterized_test.hpp>
//...
void Testsub(const std::string &name)
{
    cout<<"File_name: "<<name<<endl;
}
test_suite* init_unit_test_suite( int argc, char* argv[] ) 
{
  std::vector<std::string> files_to_run_local;

  for(int i = 0; i < framework::master_test_suite().argc; i++)
  {
    if(std::string(framework::master_test_suite().argv[i]) == "-F")
    {
      if(i == framework::master_test_suite().argc - 1)
      {
        std::cerr << "Error in the command line" << std::endl;
        throw boost::unit_test::framework::setup_error("Error in the command line");
      }
      files_to_run_local.push_back(framework::master_test_suite().argv[++i]);
    }
  }

  test_suite* ts = BOOST_TEST_SUITE( "unit_geometric" );
  ts->add( BOOST_PARAM_TEST_CASE( &Testsub, 
                                  files_to_run_local.begin(), 
                                  files_to_run_local.end() ) ); 

  framework::master_test_suite().add(ts);

  return 0;
}

Now, I think you are the only one to decide over the method used to pass the list of files to the unit test framework. 现在,我认为您是唯一决定将文件列表传递给单元测试框架的方法的人。 A file containing all files would be also a good solution, and might be appropriate if the list to pass is big, but has the disadvantage of using an intermediate file to do that. 包含所有文件的文件也是一个很好的解决方案,如果要传递的列表很大,则可能是适当的选择,但缺点是使用中间文件来执行此操作。

But answering that question really depends on what framework is driving your tests (cmake, shell, etc.) Python/cmake can generate either the command line or the intermediate file very easily for you. 但是,回答这个问题实际上取决于驱动测试的框架(cmake,shell等)。Python/ cmake可以非常轻松地生成命令行或中间文件。

In all case, the clean method is to call the BOOST_PARAM_TEST_CASE macro. 在所有情况下,clean方法都是调用BOOST_PARAM_TEST_CASE宏。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM