简体   繁体   English

将子类传递给方法但将超类作为参数?

[英]Passing in a sub-class to a method but having the super class as the parameter?

I have an abstract class Vehicle with 2 implemented subclasses RedVehicle and YellowVehicle .我有一个抽象类Vehicle其中包含 2 个实现的子类RedVehicleYellowVehicle

In another class I have a List<Vehicle> containing instances of both subclasses.在另一个类中,我有一个List<Vehicle>包含两个子类的实例。 I want to be able to pass into a method a class type and then use that type to decide which set of objects I want to do something to in the List .我希望能够将一个类类型传递给一个方法,然后使用该类型来决定我想要对List中的哪一组对象执行某些操作。

Since Class is generic I should parameterise it with something, however putting the parameter as the parent class Vehicle stops the calling code working since exampleMethod is now expecting a type of Vehicle, not a subclass of RedVehicle or YellowVehicle .由于Class是通用的,我应该用一些东西对其进行参数化,但是将参数作为父类Vehicle停止调用代码的工作,因为exampleMethod现在需要一种 Vehicle 类型,而不是RedVehicleYellowVehicle的子类。

I feel there should be a clean way to do this so what would be the correct way to implement the functionality?我觉得应该有一种干净的方法来做到这一点,那么实现该功能的正确方法是什么?

nb I don't necessarily have to pass in the Class type, if there are better suggestions I'd be happy to try those. nb 我不一定必须传入Class类型,如果有更好的建议,我很乐意尝试。

Calling code:调用代码:

service.exampleMethod(RedVehicle.class);
service.exampleMethod(YellowVehicle.class);

Fields/Method:字段/方法:

//List of vehicles
//Vehicle has 2 subclasses, RedVehicle and YellowVehicle
private List<Vehicle> vehicles;

//Having <Vehicle> as the Class parameter stops the calling code working
public void exampleMethod(Class<Vehicle> type) 
{
    for(Vehicle v : vehicles)
    {
        if(v.getClass().equals(type))
        {
            //do something
        }
    }
}

改为这样做:

public <T extends Vehicle> void exampleMethod(Class<T> type) 

Why don't you use the visitor pattern ?为什么不使用访问者模式

That way you这样你

  • don't need type tokens不需要类型标记
  • let dynamic dispatch handle the case distinction (instead of if(v.getClass().equals(type)) )让动态调度处理大小写区别(而不是if(v.getClass().equals(type))
  • are more flexible (following OCP )更灵活(遵循OCP

In detail:详细地:

your abstract class Vehicle gets a method accept(Visitor v) , with the subclasses implementing it by calling the appropriate method on v .您的抽象类Vehicle获得一个方法accept(Visitor v) ,子类通过在v上调用适当的方法来实现它。

public interface Visitor {
  visitRedVehicle(RedVehicle red);
  visitYellowVehicle(YellowVehicle yellow);
}

Using a visitor:使用访问者:

public class Example {

  public void useYellowOnly() {
    exampleMethod(new Visitor() {
        visitRedVehicle(RedVehicle red) {};
        visitYellowVehicle(YellowVehicle yellow) {
             //...action
        });
  }
  public void exampleMethod(Visitor visitor){
      for(Vehicle v : vehicles) {
          v.accept(visitor);
      }  
  }
}

The accepted answer works and got me where I wanted to go.接受的答案有效并让我到达了我想去的地方。 I thought I would add this just to make it clearer to anyone who might need it.我想我会添加这个只是为了让任何可能需要它的人更清楚。

In this case RevisedExposure is a sub-class of Exposure.在这种情况下,RevisedExposure 是 Exposure 的子类。 I need to call GetMetadata() with a list of either of these, which results in the same result set.我需要使用其中之一的列表调用 GetMetadata(),这会产生相同的结果集。

private async Task<List<Metadata>> GetMetadata<T>(List<T> exposures) where T : Exposure

Now I can call this method from two places with different versions of the list like this.现在我可以像这样从两个不同版本的列表调用这个方法。

var metadata = await GetExposureMetadata(revisions);

or要么

var metadata = await GetExposureMetadata(exposures);

works great!效果很好!

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM