简体繁体 English

微数据 - 我们应该使用rdf.data-vocabulary.org或Schema.org

[英]Microdata - Should we use rdf.data-vocabulary.org or Schema.org

原文 2012-11-24 23:49:48 9 2 html/ html5/ seo/ microdata

As I said in my title, I ask which (or maybe the both) of data-vocabulary or Schema.org we should use ? 正如我在标题中所说，我问我们应该使用哪些（或两者）数据词汇或Schema.org？

I know that Schema.org is the one recommanded by google, but i can see data-vocabulary on many website. 我知道Schema.org是google推荐的那个，但我可以在许多网站上看到数据词汇。 And I even see the both on a single page ! 我甚至在一个页面上看到了这两个！

2 个解决方案

Both are fine. 两者都很好。 I wouldn't mix and match! 我不会混搭！

I will say however that (personally, anecdotally) I have seen better search results from well implemented schema'd sites than other microformats. 然而，我会说（个人而言，有趣的是）我已经看到来自良好实现的架构网站的搜索结果比其他微格式更好。

I'm thinking Schema.org. 我在想Schema.org。 For these reasons: 由于这些原因：

On Google's own rich snippits page they recommend it: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/164506?hl=en 在谷歌自己丰富的snippits页面上，他们推荐它： https ： //support.google.com/webmasters/answer/164506？hl = en

New! 新！ schema.org lets you mark up a much wider range of item types on your pages, using a vocabulary that Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! schema.org允许您使用Google，Microsoft和Yahoo!的词汇表在您的页面上标记更广泛的项目类型。 can all understand. 都可以理解。 Find out more. 了解更多。 (Google still supports your existing rich snippets markup, though.) （但Google仍然支持您现有的丰富网页摘要标记。）

This Google FAQ is also very supportive: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1211158?hl=en 此Google常见问题解答也非常支持： https ： //support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1211158？hl = zh-CN

schema.org is a collaboration by Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! schema.org是谷歌，微软和雅虎的合作！ to improve the web by creating a structured data markup schema supported by major search engines. 通过创建主要搜索引擎支持的结构化数据标记架构来改进Web。

So it would seem this is the one Google is pushing now, and they claim support by 3 major search engines too. 所以看起来这就是谷歌现在所推动的，他们也声称支持3大搜索引擎。