Java代码在android上给出了不同的结果

Question

I have some code, running on the PC as just java code, it gives the answer I want (the right one). On android the same code gives very different answers.

The code I am using was originally from the JsatTrack project, and gives these answers jun as a java project in eclipse (correct answers):

Lat [deg]:10.386382587628313
Lon [deg]:-93.88496253189982
Alt [m]  :418288.8335920386

The same code, with same input on Android gives this result:

Lat [deg]:-37.97635062163793
Lon [deg]:-147.34940989563563
Alt [m]  :6.86973250782099E29

I am new to java so where would I start looking to track down a problem like this. Would it be in the way android handles math for example?

So I guess my question boils down to why would the PC and android give different answers to the same maths questions? 2+2 should give t he same answer on any platform. The math in the SGP4 models is more complex but it's still just math.

The code is available here if any one wants to have a look

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/70291490/jstest.zip

Answer 1

I am new to java so where would I start looking to track down a problem like this?

Connect your Android phone via USB on the PC and on Eclipse double click the left-hand side of the relative code that starts doing the math, it should appear a blue dot (code breakpoint). Click the button with a little bug on it (DEBUG button) on Eclipse toolbar. It will launch the project on the device and stop processing wherever u put the dot.

Now you can use the debug view toolbar to go through the code line-by-line and hoover the mouse on your classes/fields to see their values. You can do the same on the PC and compare each other value.

Answer 2

The problem was very similar to my previous question on stackoverflow (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14190692/how-to-debug-dalvikvm-rejecting-opcode)

Android can't handle lots of local variables, so defining them outside of the method is the solution. In my previous question dalvikvm was rejecting the method. In this case it was different, this code here:

ss = 78.0 / radiusearthkm + 1.0;

was setting ss as 1.0 as while radiuseathkm was being set a few lines earlier in the debugger it has a value of 0.0 when it should be 6378.135 so ss would = 1.0122292801892716. That error then propagates through the next few hundred calculations and there is the problem.

So I changed this:

public static boolean sgp4init(
        Gravconsttype whichconst, char opsmode, final int satn, final double epoch,
        final double xbstar, final double xecco, final double xargpo,
        final double xinclo, final double xmo, final double xno,
        final double xnodeo, SGP4SatData satrec)
{
    /* --------------------- local variables ------------------------ */
    double ao, ainv, con42, cosio, sinio, cosio2, eccsq,
            omeosq, posq, rp, rteosq,
            cnodm, snodm, cosim, sinim, cosomm, sinomm, cc1sq,
            cc2, cc3, coef, coef1, cosio4, day, dndt,
            em, emsq, eeta, etasq, gam, argpm, nodem,
            inclm, mm, nm, perige, pinvsq, psisq, qzms24,
            rtemsq, s1, s2, s3, s4, s5, s6,
            s7, sfour, ss1, ss2, ss3, ss4, ss5,
            ss6, ss7, sz1, sz2, sz3, sz11, sz12,
            sz13, sz21, sz22, sz23, sz31, sz32, sz33,
            tc, temp, temp1, temp2, temp3, tsi, xpidot,
            xhdot1, z1, z2, z3, z11, z12, z13,
            z21, z22, z23, z31, z32, z33,
            qzms2t, ss, j2, j3oj2, j4, x2o3, //r[3], v[3],
            tumin, mu, radiusearthkm, xke, j3;
    double[] r = new double[3];
    double[] v = new double[3];

to this:

static double radiusearthkm, ao, ainv, con42, cosio, sinio, cosio2, eccsq,
        omeosq, posq, rp, rteosq,
        cnodm, snodm, cosim, sinim, cosomm, sinomm, cc1sq,
        cc2, cc3, coef, coef1, cosio4, day, dndt,
        em, emsq, eeta, etasq, gam, argpm, nodem,
        inclm, mm, nm, perige, pinvsq, psisq, qzms24,
        rtemsq, s1, s2, s3, s4, s5, s6,
        s7, sfour, ss1, ss2, ss3, ss4, ss5,
        ss6, ss7, sz1, sz2, sz3, sz11, sz12,
        sz13, sz21, sz22, sz23, sz31, sz32, sz33,
        tc, temp, temp1, temp2, temp3, tsi, xpidot,
        xhdot1, z1, z2, z3, z11, z12, z13,
        z21, z22, z23, z31, z32, z33,
        qzms2t, ss, j2, j3oj2, j4, x2o3, //r[3], v[3],
        tumin, mu,  xke, j3;


public static boolean sgp4init(
        SGP4unit_a.Gravconsttype whichconst, char opsmode, final int satn, final double epoch,
        final double xbstar, final double xecco, final double xargpo,
        final double xinclo, final double xmo, final double xno,
        final double xnodeo, SGP4SatData satrec)
{

    double[] r = new double[3];
    double[] v = new double[3];

and all is now working correctly.