简体繁体 English

如何只迁移到1或2个hg + svn存储库主机？

[英]How to migrate to just 1 or 2 hg + svn repository hosts?

原文 2013-02-08 04:16:13 2 1 svn/ mercurial/ repository/ google-code

I use svn + hg. 我用svn + hg。 Should I merge to just one or 2 repository hosts? 我应该只合并到一两个存储库主机吗？ Is there disadvantage in merging to just one or 2 repository hosts? 仅合并到一台或两台存储库主机是否有缺点？ I used hg (bitbucket, googlecode) and svn (xp-dev.com and googlecode). 我用过hg（bitbucket，googlecode）和svn（xp-dev.com和googlecode）。 So if it matters to choose between bitbucket, xp-dev.com and googlecode, which one is best? 因此，如果在bitbucket，xp-dev.com和googlecode之间进行选择很重要，哪一个最好？ I think the disadvantage with code.google is that it's open source and I'm indifferent towards bitbucket and xp-dev who both seem able to do what I want. 我认为code.google的缺点在于它是开源的，我对bitbucket和xp-dev都漠不关心，他们似乎都能做到我想要的。

1 个解决方案

Well, it's subjective question (and answers), bad for SO format. 好吧，这是一个主观的问题（和答案），不适用于SO格式。 But I'll try to answer 但我会尽力回答

Never used XP-Dev, can say nothing 从未使用过XP-Dev，无话可说
GCode - only public repo, small space-limit GCode-仅公共仓库，空间有限
BitBucket - private repos (but free plain only for small team of 5 users), no space-limits, only hg/git without Subversion BitBucket-私有存储库（但仅由5个用户组成的小型团队免费使用），无空间限制，只有hg / git，无Subversion

From this point - BitBucket wins 从这一点来看-BitBucket获胜

But, if using Subversion is a must also, you can see at Assembla as "All in one solution" (or Assembla Portfoli o): 但是，如果还必须使用Subversion，则可以在Assembla上将其视为“多合一解决方案”（或Assembla Portfoli o）：

private and public "Spaces", 私人和公共“空间”，
1Gb total for any amount of your separate spaces (free plain, paid plains differ), 任意数量的单独空间总计1Gb（免费平原，付费平原不同），
Git-Github repo/SVN-external SVN repo/HG/Perforce as SCM, Git-Github回购/ SVN-外部SVN回购/ HG / Perforce作为SCM，
rich set of ALM-tools (good Wiki, smart Tickets) 丰富的ALM工具集（良好的Wiki，智能票证）