![](/img/trans.png)
[英]Mockito: InOrder.verify does not prohibit intermediate calls on a mock
[英]Mockito inOrder.verify() fails using mock as function argument
我正在尝试编写一个单元测试来检查是否在一个订单中调用了方法。 要做到这一点,我正在使用Mockito的inOrder.verify(),如下所示:
@Test
public void shouldExecuteAllFileCommandsOnAFileInFIFOOrder() {
// Given
ProcessFileListCommand command = new ProcessFileListCommand();
FileCommand fileCommand1 = mock(FileCommand.class, "fileCommand1");
command.addCommand(fileCommand1);
FileCommand fileCommand2 = mock(FileCommand.class, "fileCommand2");
command.addCommand(fileCommand2);
File file = mock(File.class, "file");
File[] fileArray = new File[] { file };
// When
command.executeOn(fileArray);
// Then
InOrder inOrder = Mockito.inOrder(fileCommand1, fileCommand2);
inOrder.verify(fileCommand1).executeOn(file);
inOrder.verify(fileCommand2).executeOn(file);
}
但是,第二个verify()失败并出现以下错误:
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.VerificationInOrderFailure:
Verification in order failure
Wanted but not invoked:
fileCommand2.executeOn(file);
-> at (...)
Wanted anywhere AFTER following interaction:
fileCommand1.executeOn(file);
-> at (...)
如果我将.executeOn(file)
更改为.executeOn(any(File.class))
,测试会通过,但我想确保使用相同的参数调用这些方法。
这是我正在测试的课程:
public class ProcessFileListCommand implements FileListCommand {
private List<FileCommand> commands = new ArrayList<FileCommand>();
public void addCommand(final FileCommand command) {
this.commands.add(command);
}
@Override
public void executeOn(final File[] files) {
for (File file : files) {
for (FileCommand command : commands) {
file = command.executeOn(file);
}
}
}
}
测试失败,因为第二个executeOn()
方法调用的参数与第一个参数的参数不同,因为第一个文件被另一个文件替换。
file = command.executeOn(file);
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.