[英]Separating business logic from PHP Doctrine 2
我使用symfony 2.3和php doctrine 2。
该计划有以下型号:
AND MAIN CLASS BadOrderList - 错误订单列表,此类代码:
private $factory; private $repository; private $manager; public function __construct( BadOrderEntryFactory $f, BadOrderEntryRepository $r, BadOrderEntryManager $m ) { $this->factory = $f; $this->repository = $r; $this->manager = $m; } public function has(Order $order) { return $this->repository->existsByOrder($order); } public function add(Order $order) { if (! $this->has($order)) { $entry = $this->factory->create($order); $this->manager->save($entry); } } public function remove(Order $order) { $entry = $this->repository->findOneByOrder($order); if ($entry !== null) { $this->manager->delete($entry); } }
我非常喜欢这门课的设计。 我想了很多。 一切都很美好。 但! 有一个问题:必须在事务中执行方法添加和删除操作。
PHP Docrine 2中的事务代码如下所示:
<?php
$em->getConnection()->beginTransaction();
try {
//... do some work
$em->getConnection()->commit();
} catch (Exception $e) {
$em->getConnection()->rollback();
throw $e;
}
但是如何在BadOrderList中调用此代码?
我花了很多时间并根据数据库(相应的PHP Doctrine 2)删除了,并再次创建它? 现在依赖是隐藏在类BadOrderEntryRepository和BadOrderEntryManager中。
如何在类BadOrderList中隐藏对事务机制的依赖?
在我们讨论之后,我会回答你的问题。 问题实际上不是“如何在BadOrderList类中隐藏对事务机制的依赖?” ,但如何将模型与持久层分离? (在特定情况下的学说2)。
我尝试用一些代码说明我的建议
class BadOrderEntry
// Bad - is too bad word to describe an order here. Why is it bad? Is it Declined? Cancelled?
{
private $order;
// some code
}
class BadOrderEntryFactory
{
// If there is not to much processing to build BadOrderEntry better use factory method like BadOrderEntry::fromOrder($order);
}
class BadOrderEntryRepository
{
// here is some read model
}
class BadOrderEntryManager
// ITS a part of our model and shouldn't be coupled to ORM
{
public function save(BadEntry $be)
{
// some model events, model actions
$this->doSave($be); // here we should hide our storage manipulation
}
protected function doSave($be) // it can be abstract, but may contain some basic storage actions
{
}
// similar code for delete/remove and other model code
}
class ORMBadOrderEntryManager extends BadOrderEntryManager
// IT'S NOT the part of your model. There is no business logic. There is only persistent logic and transaction manipulation
{
protected $entityManager;
// some constructor to inject doctrine entitymanager
protected doSave($be)
{
$em = $this->entityManager;
$em->getConnection()->beginTransaction(); // suspend auto-commit
try {
$em->persist($be);
$em->flush();
$em->getConnection()->commit();
} catch (Exception $e) {
$em->getConnection()->rollback();
throw $e;
}
}
}
// You can also implement ODMBadOrderEntryManager, MemcacheBadOrderEntryManager etc.
因此,如果我们谈论目录结构,您的所有模型都可以移出捆绑并在任何地方使用。 你的Bundle结构如下:
BadEntryBundle
|
+ Entity
| |
| --- BadOrderEntryEntity.php
|
+ ORM
| |
| --- ORMBadOrderEntryManager.php
然后你只需将ORMBadOrderEntryManager注入BadOrderEntryList
您可以将您的类转换为服务,并在您的类中注入服务容器后调用它。 你可以在这里找到有关依赖注入的更多信息:
$injectedContainerOfService->get("id_of_your_service")
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.