[英]Javascript for loop wait for callback
我有这个功能:
function tryStartLocalTrendsFetch(woeid) {
var userIds = Object.keys(twitClientsMap);
var isStarted = false;
for (var i = 0; i < userIds.length; i++) {
var userId = userIds[i];
var twitClientData = twitClientsMap[userId];
var isWoeidMatch = (woeid === twitClientData.woeid);
if (isWoeidMatch) {
startLocalTrendsFetch(woeid, twitClientData, function (err, data) {
if (err) {
// Couldn't start local trends fetch for userId: and woeid:
isStarted = false;
} else {
isStarted = true;
}
});
// This will not obviously work because startLocalTrendsFetch method is async and will execute immediately
if (isStarted) {
break;
}
}
}
console.log("No users are fetching woeid: " + woeid);
}
这个方法的要点是我想要行if (isStarted) { break; }
if (isStarted) { break; }
工作。 原因是如果它已经启动它不应该继续循环并尝试启动另一个循环。
我在NodeJS中这样做。
尝试使用递归定义
function tryStartLocalTrendsFetch(woeid) {
var userIds = Object.keys(twitClientsMap);
recursiveDefinition (userIds, woeid);
}
function recursiveDefinition (userIds, woeid, userIndex)
var userId = userIds[userIndex = userIndex || 0];
var twitClientData = twitClientsMap[userId];
var isWoeidMatch = (woeid === twitClientData.woeid);
if (isWoeidMatch && userIndex<userIds.length) {
startLocalTrendsFetch(woeid, twitClientData, function (err, data) {
if (err) {
recursiveDefinition(userIds, woeid, userIndex + 1)
} else {
console.log("No users are fetching woeid: " + woeid);
}
});
} else {
console.log("No users are fetching woeid: " + woeid);
}
}
您也可以使用async
( npm install async
):
var async = require('async');
async.forEach(row, function(col, callback){
// Do your magic here
callback(); // indicates the end of loop - exit out of loop
}, function(err){
if(err) throw err;
});
更多材料可以帮助您: Node.js - 使用async lib - async.foreach和object
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.