[英]Ruby on Rails Sidekiq order of workers execution
我有与Sidekiq后台工作者一起使用的Rails应用程序
MyWorker1.perform_async(param_1)
MyWorker1.perform_async(param_2)
MyWorker1.perform_async(param_3)
MyWorker1.perform_async(param_4)
MyWorker2.perform_async(param_5)
如何使MyWorker2仅在所有MyWorker1完成工作后才能执行?
你可以使用GUSH
class SimpleworkFlow < Gush::Workflow
run MyWorker1, params: {param_1}
run Myworker1, params: {param_2}
run MyWorker1, params: {param_3}
run MyWorker1, params: {param_4}
run Myworker2, params: {param_5}, after: MyWorker1
end
出于调试目的,您可以可视化
bundle exec gush viz SampleWorkflow
然后简单的步骤
flow = SampleWorkflow.new
flow.save
然后开始工作
bundle exec gush workers
然后开始工作流程
flow.start!
无论你为它付出,并使用Sidekiq与亲批 :
class CallNextJob
def on_success(status, options)
MyWorker2.perform_async(options[:bundle])
end
end
params = [param1, param2, param3, param4]
batch = Sidekiq::Batch.new
batch.on(:success, CallNextJob, bundle: param5)
batch.jobs do
params.each {|param| MyWorker1.perform_async(param)}
end
puts "Just started Batch #{batch.bid}"
或者,您只需在每个作业的末尾保存完成状态,然后在每个MyWorker1完成时将MyWorker2入队:
# Worker1
def heavy_load(job_id)
# do the load
...
# save state
WorkerReport.create(worker_id: job_id)
end
class WorkerReport < ActiveRecord::Base
after_commit :do_next
private
# It's important to do that in after_commit block to evade strange bugs
# When you create next job here, you are absolutely sure that
# current WorkerReport is already saved to base
def do_next
# Check if other Worker1 jobs from current bundle are finished
if self.where(...).exists?
Worker2.perform_async(...)
end
end
end
也许您可以保留Worker1结果的结果,并在最后检查结果是否完整。 如果您有一个完整的结果,那么是否比从worker1启动worker2?
MyWorker1.perform_async(param_1)-> {done:false},
MyWorker1.perform_async(param_2)-> {done:false},
MyWorker1.perform_async(param_3)-> {done:false},
MyWorker1.perform_async(param_4)-> {done:true},
MyWorker1->如果结果完成? MyWorker2
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.