繁体   English   中英

集成测试 Spring SseEmitters

[英]Integration Testing Spring SseEmitters

我一直在寻找有关如何最好地测试返回 SseEmitters 的 Spring MVC 控制器方法的提示。 我的想法很短,但有一个反复试验的解决方案,可以测试异步、线程化的行为。 下面是示例代码,只是为了演示概念,可能有一两个错字:

控制器类:

@Autowired
Publisher<MyResponse> responsePublisher;

@RequestMapping("/mypath")
public SseEmitter index() throws IOException {
    SseEmitter emitter = new SseEmitter();
    Observable<MyResponse> responseObservable = RxReactiveStreams.toObservable(responsePublisher);

    responseObservable.subscribe(
            response -> {
                try {
                    emitter.send(response);
               } catch (IOException ex) {
                    emitter.completeWithError(ex);
               }
            },
            error -> {
                emitter.completeWithError(error);
            },
            emitter::complete
    );

    return emitter;
}

测试类:

//A threaded dummy publisher to demonstrate async properties.
//Sends 2 responses with a 250ms pause in between.
protected static class MockPublisher implements Publisher<MyResponse> {
    @Override
    public void subscribe(Subscriber<? super MyResponse> subscriber) {
        new Thread() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                try {
                    subscriber.onNext(response1);
                    Thread.sleep(250);
                    subscriber.onNext(response2);
                } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
                }
                subscriber.onComplete();
            }
        }.start();
    }
}

//Assume @Configuration that autowires the above mock publisher in the controller.

//Tests the output of the controller method.
@Test
public void testSseEmitter() throws Exception {
    String path = "http://localhost/mypath/";
    String expectedContent = "data:" + response1.toString() + "\n\n" +
                             "data:" + response2.toString() + "\n\n");

    //Trial-and-Error attempts at testing this SseEmitter mechanism have yielded the following:
    //- Returning an SseEmitter triggers 'asyncStarted'
    //- Calling 'asyncResult' forces the test to wait for the process to complete
    //- However, there is no actual 'asyncResult' to test.  Instead, the content is checked for the published data.
    mockMvc.perform(get(path).contentType(MediaType.ALL))
        .andExpect(status().isOk())
        .andExpect(request().asyncStarted())
        .andExpect(request().asyncResult(nullValue()))
        .andExpect(header().string("Content-Type", "text/event-stream"))
        .andExpect(content().string(expectedContent))
}

如评论中所述,调用 asyncResult() 以确保发布者完成其工作并在测试完成之前发送两个响应。 没有它,内容检查将失败,因为内容中只存在一个响应。 但是没有要检查的实际结果,因此 asyncResult 为空。

我的具体问题是是否有更好、更精确的方法来强制测试等待异步进程完成,而不是等待不存在的 asyncResult 的 klugie 方法。 我更广泛的问题是,是否有其他库或 Spring 方法更适合于此与这些异步函数。 谢谢!

这是一个更通用的答案,因为它旨在测试将永远运行但在给定超时后将与 SSE 流断开连接的 SseEmitter。

至于与 MVC 不同的方法,正如@ErinDrummond 对 OP 所评论的那样,您可能想要调查 WebFlux。

这是一个最小的例子。 人们可能想要扩展请求的标头、不同的匹配器或单独处理流输出。

它正在设置一个延迟线程以断开与 SSE Stream 的连接,这将允许执行断言。

@Autowired
MockMvc mockMvc;


@Test
public void testSseEmitter(){

    ScheduledExecutorService execService = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(1);
    String streamUri = "/your-get-uri");
    long timeout = 500L;
    TimeUnit timeUnit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;

    MvcResult result = mockMvc.perform(get(streamURI)
            .andExpect(request().asyncStarted()).andReturn();

    MockAsyncContext asyncContext = (MockAsyncContext) result.getRequest().getAsyncContext();
    execService.schedule(() -> {
        for (AsyncListener listener : asyncContext.getListeners())
            try {
                listener.onTimeout(null);
            } catch (IOException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
    }, timeout, timeUnit);

    result.getAsyncResult();

    // assertions, e.g. response body as string contains "xyz"
    mvc.perform(asyncDispatch(result)).andExpect(content().string(containsString("xyz")));
}

暂无
暂无

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM