[英]Scala factory for generic types using the apply method?
假设我有以下特征来定义一个接口并采用几个类型参数......
trait Foo[A, B] {
// implementation details not important
}
我想使用伴侣对象作为特征的具体实现的工厂。 我还想强制用户使用Foo
接口而不是子类化所以我隐藏了伴随对象中的具体实现,如下所示:
object Foo {
def apply[A, B](thing: Thing): Foo[A, B] = {
???
}
private case class FooImpl[A1, B1](thing: Thing) extends Foo[A1, B1]
private case class AnotherFooImpl[A2, B1](thing: Thing) extends Foo[A2, B1]
}
我希望能够按如下方式使用工厂:
val foo = Foo[A1, B1](thing) // should be an instance of FooImpl
val anotherFoo = Foo[A2, B1](thing) // should be an instance of AnotherFooImpl
如何实现apply
方法来实现这一目标? 这个SO帖子似乎接近标志。
怎么样:
trait Foo[A, B]
trait Factory[A, B] {
def make(thing: Thing): Foo[A, B]
}
class Thing
object Foo {
def apply[A, B](thing: Thing)(implicit ev: Factory[A, B]) = ev.make(thing)
private case class FooImpl[A, B](thing: Thing) extends Foo[A, B]
private case class AnotherFooImpl[A, B](thing: Thing) extends Foo[A, B]
implicit val fooImplFactory: Factory[Int, String] = new Factory[Int, String] {
override def make(thing: Thing): Foo[Int, String] = new FooImpl[Int, String](thing)
}
implicit val anotherFooImplFactory: Factory[String, String] = new Factory[String, String] {
override def make(thing: Thing): Foo[String, String] = new AnotherFooImpl[String, String](thing)
}
现在:
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
import Foo._
val fooImpl = Foo[Int, String](new Thing)
val anotherFooImpl = Foo[String, String](new Thing)
println(fooImpl)
println(anotherFooImpl)
}
产量:
FooImpl(testing.X$Thing@4678c730)
AnotherFooImpl(testing.X$Thing@c038203)
使用TypeTags
(为了克服类型参数的擦除),我们可以根据传递给apply方法的类型参数调用相应的隐藏实现,如下所示。 它正确地实例化了各自的实现,但是Foo
的类型信息丢失了,实际上它会像_202
那样出现一些垃圾? 我不知道为什么会发生这种情况以及如何为Foo保留正确的类型。 也许有人可以对此有所了解。
trait Foo[A,B]
object Foo {
def apply[A: TypeTag, B: TypeTag](thing: Thing) =
if(typeTag[A] == typeTag[Int])
FooImpl(thing)
else if(typeTag[A] == typeTag[String])
AnotherFooImpl(thing)
else
new Foo[Double,Double] {}
private case class FooImpl(thing: Thing) extends Foo[Int, String]
private case class AnotherFooImpl(thing: Thing) extends Foo[String, String]
}
Foo[Int,String](new Thing) // Foo[_202, _203] = FooImpl($sess.cmd123$Thing@50350b75)
The actual types for _203 and _203 are: ???
// type _203 >: String with _201, type _202 >: Int with _200
Foo[String,String](new Thing) //Foo[_202, _203] = AnotherFooImpl($sess.cmd123$Thing@51d80d6)
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.