![](/img/trans.png)
[英]Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Linq.IQueryable<int>' to 'int?'
[英]Linq query results in Comparison operators not supported for type 'System.Linq.IQueryable`1[System.Int32]
我有以下功能:
public List<DTO.ArticleDTO> GetRecentArticles(int portalID, int moduleID, int domainID, int rootKnowledgeTypeID, int count)
{
var articles =
(from
article in _Context.Articles.LatestArticles(_Context.ArticleVersions, portalID, moduleID)
where _GetRootDomainsForArticle(article.ArticleID, article.Version, rootKnowledgeTypeID).Contains(domainID)
orderby article.UpdatedOn descending
select new ArticleDTO
{
ArticleID = article.ArticleID,
Title = article.Title,
Summary = article.Introduction,
Content = article.Content,
UpdatedOn = article.UpdatedOn,
Version = article.Version,
KnowledgeTypeText = (from
category in _Context.Categories
join
categoryVersion in _Context.ArticleCategoryVersions
on
category.CategoryID equals categoryVersion.CategoryID
where
categoryVersion.Version == article.Version &&
categoryVersion.ArticleID == article.ArticleID &&
category.ParentID == rootKnowledgeTypeID
select
category.Name
).First()
});
return articles.Take(count).ToList();
}
我想做的是获取所有属于根类别(域ID)的文章。 类别被认为是“域/子域”,每篇文章可以属于一个或多个“域和子域”。 所以这就是为什么我在上面的linq查询的where子句中使用以下方法的原因。
private IQueryable<int> _GetRootDomainsForArticle(int articleID, int version, int rootKnowledgeTypeID)
{
return from c in _Context.Categories
join cv in _Context.ArticleCategoryVersions on c.CategoryID equals cv.CategoryID
where cv.ArticleID == articleID
where cv.Version == version
where c.ParentID == null
where c.CategoryID != rootKnowledgeTypeID
select c.CategoryID;
}
我得到的错误是:“类型'System.Linq.IQueryable'1 [System.Int32]'不支持比较运算符。”
我认为是因为执行延迟,但我不太了解正确的执行方式。
编辑:
基于@SivaGopal注释,我将查询从_GetRootDomainsForArticle移到了主查询中,并且它起作用了:
public List<DTO.ArticleDTO> GetRecentArticles(int portalID, int moduleID, int domainID, int rootKnowledgeTypeID, int count)
{
var articles =
(from
article in _Context.Articles.LatestArticles(_Context.ArticleVersions, portalID, moduleID)
where (from c in _Context.Categories
join cv in _Context.ArticleCategoryVersions on c.CategoryID equals cv.CategoryID
where cv.ArticleID == article.ArticleID
where cv.Version == article.Version
where c.ParentID == null
where c.CategoryID != rootKnowledgeTypeID
select c.CategoryID).Contains(domainID)
orderby article.UpdatedOn descending
select new ArticleDTO
{
ArticleID = article.ArticleID,
Title = article.Title,
Summary = article.Introduction,
Content = article.Content,
UpdatedOn = article.UpdatedOn,
Version = article.Version,
KnowledgeTypeText = (from
category in _Context.Categories
join
categoryVersion in _Context.ArticleCategoryVersions
on
category.CategoryID equals categoryVersion.CategoryID
where
categoryVersion.Version == article.Version &&
categoryVersion.ArticleID == article.ArticleID &&
category.ParentID == rootKnowledgeTypeID
select
category.Name
).First()
});
return articles.Take(count).ToList();
}
我对Linq的有限了解使我相信,可以将查询分解为一种查询组合形式的方法,从而使它可重用。 似乎并非如此,但是肯定有一种方法可以这样做,因为它将大大减少代码,特别是在查询的某些部分经常被重用的情况下。
尝试进一步拆分功能,可以使用冗长而深入的Linq方法,但对于可读性而言,它不是那么好,并且可能会引入您正在谈论的此类错误。 我尚未对此进行测试,但它应该有助于解决您的问题:
public List<DTO.ArticleDTO> GetRecentArticles(int portalID, int moduleID, int domainID, int rootKnowledgeTypeID, int count)
{
var allArticles = _Context.Articles.LatestArticles(_Context.ArticleVersions, portalID, moduleID);
var filteredArticles = new List<DTO.ArticleDTO>();
foreach (DTO.ArticleDTO article in allArticles)
{
var domains = _GetRootDomainsForArticle(article.ArticleID, article.Version, rootKnowledgeTypeID);
if (domains.Contains(domainID)
{
filteredArticles.Add(article);
}
}
var articles = filteredArticles.OrderBy(article.UpdatedOn).Descending().Select(article => new DTO.ArticleDTO {
ArticleID = article.ArticleID,
Title = article.Title,
Summary = article.Introduction,
Content = article.Content,
UpdatedOn = article.UpdatedOn,
Version = article.Version,
KnowledgeTypeText = (from category in _Context.Categories
join categoryVersion in _Context.ArticleCategoryVersions
on category.CategoryID equals categoryVersion.CategoryID
where
categoryVersion.Version == article.Version &&
categoryVersion.ArticleID == article.ArticleID &&
category.ParentID == rootKnowledgeTypeID
select
category.Name
).First()
}).Take(count).ToList();
}
您还绝对需要从_GetRootDomainsForArticle函数返回IQueryable <>吗? 如果可以解决问题,我将尝试返回IEnumerable <>。
幸田
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.