[英]Why do files in /proc/self end up being owned by root if a program has its setuid bit set?
我有这个小程序:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
extern char **environ;
int main()
{
char * const arglist[] = { "/bin/ls", "-l", "/proc/self/maps", NULL };
uid_t uid, euid, suid;
gid_t gid, egid, sgid;
getresuid(&uid, &euid, &suid);
printf("Before: uid: %u, euid: %u, suid: %u\n", uid, euid, suid);
uid = euid;
setresuid(uid, euid, suid);
getresuid(&uid, &euid, &suid);
printf(" After: uid: %u, euid: %u, suid: %u\n", uid, euid, suid);
getresgid(&gid, &egid, &sgid);
printf("Before: gid: %u, egid: %u, sgid: %u\n", gid, egid, sgid);
gid = egid;
setresuid(gid, egid, sgid);
getresuid(&gid, &egid, &sgid);
printf(" After: gid: %u, egid: %u, sgid: %u\n", gid, egid, sgid);
printf("Get result == %d\n", prctl(PR_GET_DUMPABLE, 0, 0, 0, 0));
printf("Set result == %d\n", prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, 1, 0, 0, 0));
printf("Get result == %d\n", prctl(PR_GET_DUMPABLE, 0, 0, 0, 0));
if (fork())
{
return 0;
}
execve(arglist[0], arglist, environ);
}
我将此程序编译为一个名为small-test
的可执行文件,并将其所有权更改为测试用户:
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ ls -l small-test
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 testing testing 8512 Oct 23 12:55 small-test
然后我运行程序:
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ ./small-test
Before: uid: 1001, euid: 1001, suid: 1001
After: uid: 1001, euid: 1001, suid: 1001
Before: gid: 1001, egid: 1001, sgid: 1001
After: gid: 1001, egid: 1001, sgid: 1001
Get result == 1
Set result == 0
Get result == 1
-r--r--r--. 1 hopper hopper 0 Oct 23 14:50 /proc/self/maps
到现在为止还挺好。 然后我这样做:
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ sudo chmod ug+s ./small-test
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ ls -l ./small-test
-rwsrwsr-x. 1 testing testing 8512 Oct 23 12:55 ./small-test
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ ./small-test
Before: uid: 1001, euid: 1002, suid: 1002
After: uid: 1002, euid: 1002, suid: 1002
Before: gid: 1001, egid: 1002, sgid: 1002
After: gid: 1002, egid: 1002, sgid: 1002
Get result == 0
Set result == 0
Get result == 1
-r--r--r--. 1 root root 0 Oct 23 12:59 /proc/self/maps
为什么/proc/self/maps
最终归root
而不是经过testing
或omnifarious
? 请注意,如果我卸下fork
,结果不会改变。
这让我感到烦恼的原因是,我需要创建一个程序,该程序将自己作为用户(而不是执行该程序的用户)放入一个命名空间中。 这样一来,我无权访问cgroup和启动程序的用户所拥有的其他东西。 但是不允许我写入程序的uid_map
或gid_map
,因此无法正确设置名称空间。
注意:我编辑了这个问题,以包含对prctl
的调用,以设置(和读取) DUMPABLE
标志作为答案(和手册),指示重置该问题应将所有者固定在/proc/self/*
文件上。 正如您在新程序中看到的那样,没有。
编辑:上面的程序有一个错误,其中它正在调用setresuid
而不是setresgid
。 即使将调用添加到prctl
之后,这也是导致我的问题的原因。 prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, 1);
如果进程的实际和有效组和用户ID不相同,则调用无效。
出于安全原因,任何suid进程都将默认将其/proc/self
目录归root拥有(以防止用户进行核心转储并检查其内存中是否包含有价值的信息)。
您可以通过使用prctl PR_SET_DUMPABLE
手动使进程转储为suid
来设置所有者。
这是proc(5)
,其中包含正在发生的事情以及如何影响它的描述:
/proc/[pid]
There is a numerical subdirectory for each running
process; the subdirectory is named by the process
ID.
Each /proc/[pid] subdirectory contains the pseudo-
files and directories described below. These
files are normally owned by the effective user and
effective group ID of the process. However, as a
security measure, the ownership is made root:root
if the process's "dumpable" attribute is set to a
value other than 1. This attribute may change for
the following reasons:
* The attribute was explicitly set via the
prctl(2) PR_SET_DUMPABLE operation.
* The attribute was reset to the value in the
file /proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable (described
below), for the reasons described in prctl(2).
Resetting the "dumpable" attribute to 1 reverts
the ownership of the /proc/[pid]/* files to the
process's real UID and real GID.
在下面的内容中, suid_dumpable
可以说明默认值为何:
1 ("debug")
All processes dump core when possible.
(Reasons why a process might nevertheless
not dump core are described in core(5).)
The core dump is owned by the filesystem
user ID of the dumping process and no secu‐
rity is applied. This is intended for sys‐
tem debugging situations only: this mode is
insecure because it allows unprivileged
users to examine the memory contents of
privileged processes.
另外, prctl(2)
列出了影响可转储性的非suid情况:
PR_SET_DUMPABLE (since Linux 2.3.20)
(...)
Normally, this flag is set to 1. However, it is
reset to the current value contained in the file
/proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable (which by default has
the value 0), in the following circumstances:
* The process's effective user or group ID is
changed.
* The process's filesystem user or group ID is
changed (see credentials(7)).
* The process executes (execve(2)) a set-user-ID
or set-group-ID program, resulting in a change
of either the effective user ID or the effec‐
tive group ID.
(...)
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.